Nevada County Grand Jury
2006-2007
Findings & Recommendations
12 findings
F1:
There has been a significant turnover in the NID management team over the past four years.
F2:
The general manager, assistant general manager, finance manager and chief engineer have replaced long-term predecessors who have retired.
F3:
There is a new human resources manager and a new maintenance manager.
F4:
The new NID management team members bring with them relevant prior experience and expertise.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1:
NID Board of Directors should take full advantage of the expertise and experience of the NID management team.
F5:
The 2007-2009 budget was well presented to the public.
F6:
The Jury observed a pattern of lack of sensitivity to public and other director comment on the part of one board member. Conclusions
Related Recommendations (1)
R2:
NID Board of Directors should take steps to assure that all of its members demonstrate sensitivity towards and respect for each other and for members of the public appearing before them. 3 | P ag e Funding of Capital Improvements: Up to now, use long-term debt has been effective, but future caution is warranted.
F7:
A reduced water supply will reduce NID’s revenue generated from hydroelectric operations, as well as the amount of water available for sale. Conclusions
F8:
The property to receive a TSL must be capable of connecting to an existing water main and be located where NID facilities will logically require a mainline fronting the property in the future. 7 | P ag e
F9:
NID, through the Placer County Water Agency and the City of Lincoln, currently causes treated water to be delivered to approximately 3500 homes in a portion of the City of Lincoln lying within the NID exterior boundaries.
F10:
NID has approved a Memorandum of Understanding covering the feasibility, planning and eventual construction of a water treatment plant near Lincoln to supply NID raw water which will be treated and sold to residents within the NID boundaries (10,000 to 20,000 homes estimated).
F11:
The Lincoln water treatment plant, if constructed, would be paid for by Lincoln and NID (currently estimated at 80% Lincoln, and 20% NID), owned, and operated by NID.
F12:
The NID Board approved absorbing the cost of the installation of a treated water line adjacent to the route of the pending Lower Cascade Canal/Banner Cascade Pipeline Project. Conclusions
Additional Recommendations
2
Not linked to specific findings.
R3:
The current Depreciation Reserve for equipment replacement and the Maintenance Reserve for unbudgeted emergency repairs should be replaced with a reserve for maintenance, repairs, and replacement of Water Division assets. Operating Deficits: Operating the Water Division at a loss, year after year, is unwise.
R4:
The NID rate schedule should produce revenue sufficient to achieve a balanced budget for the Water Division without the need to use reserves to avoid a deficit.
Findings & Recommendations
11 findings
F1:
At the time of the Jury’s investigation, the City’s offices contained 26 boxes of unorganized paperwork, substantial unopened mail going back five years, and unfiled/unorganized City records going back to the 1980’s.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1:
The incumbent City Clerk was ftrst appointed in 1987 and has been reelected to the offtce every four years smce. Answer: Those findings predate the current City Manager
F2:
At the time of the Jury’s investigation, City offices contained stacks of records, which were unsecured from risk of theft, loss or damage.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2:
Shortly thereafter, the incumbent City Clerk was designated as the Offtce Operations Supervisor and held that position until its elimination by the City Council on April 25, 2006. Answer: Partially agree. The City Council voted 4-1 on June 26, 2006, to eliminate the Office Operations Supervisor position in a public meeting after extensive public input and receiving the unanimous recommendation of the City's consultants.
F3:
At the time of the Jury’s investigation, there was no apparent record retention/disposal policy in place. Rather, record keeping appeared to be fragmented and duplicative.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3:
Over the years, the functions of the elected offtce of City Clerk and the appointed offtce of Office Operations Supervisor were allowed to become blended and the duties indistinguishable. Answer: Partially agree. The positions were blended but not indistinguishable. City Clerk duties are detailed by State law.
F4:
In its 2001-2002 Report, the Jury found the City did not then “…have a written procedure for records management, resulting in a lack of guidelines for employees. Additionally, the manner of maintaining public records does not comply with State guidelines.”
Related Recommendations (1)
R4:
The City Council eliminated the position of Offtce Operations Supervisor, following reports from a citizens' committee, and an investigative team composed of a forensic certifted public accountant, a personnel specialist, a former law enforcement offtcer and a fmancial consultant. Answer: Agree
F5:
In its 2001-2002 Report, the Jury recommended, among other matters, (a) the City develop a much-needed records management system; (b) the City implement the Local Government Records Management Guidelines issued by the California Secretary of State; and (c) the City initiate a records security and back up system.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5:
The incumbent City Clerk, subsequent to April 25, 2006, has failed to enter the Nevada City Offtces for purposes of performing the duties of City Clerk. Answer: Partially disagree. The City Clerk has entered City Hall on approximately two times, to perform an official duty.
F6:
The City, in its Response to the Jury’s 2001-2002 Report wrote, “The City is currently in the process of hiring a new City Manager. The City Clerk will discuss this item [Records Management] with the new City Manager after the position is filled.”
Related Recommendations (1)
R6:
At the time of the Jury's investigation, the Jury found that deeds conveying real property to the City had not been recorded. Answer: Agree, as was report to the Grand Jury. Deeds are now recorded.
F7:
In further response to the Jury’s 2001-2002 Report, City representatives also wrote: “When the Grand Jury provides funding, we will implement new Records Management Guidelines.” Conclusions:
Related Recommendations (1)
R7:
At the time of the jury's investigation, City Ordinances and Council Resolutions were not being maintained in an organized manner, were not readily accessible by the public, and had not been codifted, indexed or published since 1990. Additionally, City Council Minutes had not been ftled since 1995. Answer: Agree. Minutes are now filed and a draft new Municipal Code is being proofed.
F8:
The City has had to hire additional personnel to perform functions of the City Clerk and to cover the responsibilities of the former Office Operations Supervisor.
Related Recommendations (1)
R8:
The City has had to hire additional personnel to perform functions of the City Clerk and to cover the responsibilities of the former Office Operations Supervisor. Answer: Partially agree. The Finance Manager has been hired to perform finance duties.
F9:
The incumbent City Clerk, in her individual capacity, has sued Nevada City alleging wrongful termination of her employment as Office Operations Supervisor.
Related Recommendations (1)
R9:
The incumbent City Clerk, in her individual capacity, has sued Nevada City alleging wrongful termination of her employment as Office Operations Supervisor. Answer: Agree
F10:
Over seventy percent of California cities utilize an appointed City Clerk in order to provide more effective oversight of the work of that position. Conclusions:
Related Recommendations (1)
R10:
Over seventy percent of California cities utilize an appointed City Clerk in order to provide more effective oversight of the work of that position. Answer: I believe this premise to be true but have not investigated the Clerk issues. Recommendation: The City should, as permitted by California Government Code Section 36508, hold an election to make the office of City Clerk an appointive position, and the City Council should thereafter, by Ordinance, determine whether the City Council or the City Manager appoint the City Clerk. Response: This recommendation is to the City Council. City Management Practice and Accountability
F11:
The City, as of March 2007, could not provide the cost of the reports referred to in No. 8 above; however, materials reviewed by the Jury suggest the cost will exceed $200,000. Conclusions:
Related Recommendations (1)
R11:
The City, as of March 2007, could not provide the cost of the reports referred to in No.8 above; However, materials reviewed by the Jury suggest the cost will exceed $200,000. Answer: Disagree Recommendations:
Quick View
Full Details →
Findings & Recommendations
13 findings
F1:
Juvenile Hall is under the jurisdiction of the Nevada County Probation Department and operated according to the requirements of the California Welfare and Institutions Code.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1:
Juvenile Hall is under the jurisdiction of the Nevada County Probation Department and operated according to the requirements of the California Welfare and Institutions Code. Agree.
F2:
The facility is able to accommodate 30 wards. While ward population varies, the facility is not considered to have an overpopulation problem. On the day of the inspection the ward population totaled 12, nine males and three females. The average stay is 47 days.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2:
The facility is able to accommodate 30 wards. While ward population varies, the facility is not considered to have an overpopulation problem. On the day of the inspection the ward population totaled 12, nine males and three females. The average stay is 47 days. Agree.
F3:
Should the need develop, the facility could be expanded to 60 beds as originally planned. The kitchen and laundry facilities are already in place to service up to 60 wards.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3:
Should the need develop, the facility could be expanded to 60 beds as originally planned. The kitchen and laundry facilities are already in place to service up to 60 wards. Agree.
F4:
A sophisticated electronic central control station monitors housing units, general areas, classrooms, individual cells, and an outside recreation yard. Surveillance includes broad, direct sightlines and remote television cameras.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4:
A sophisticated electronic central control station monitors housing units, general areas, classrooms, individual cells, and an outside recreation yard. Surveillance includes broad, direct sightlines and remote television cameras. Agree.
F5:
California Code of Regulations Title 15 mandates rigid schedules for nutrition and meals, as well as exercise, work, and study periods. Classrooms appear well stocked with - 1 - | Pa ge educational materials and technology. The Nevada Joint Union High School District provides a teacher and an aide in the classrooms.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5:
California Code of Regulations Title 15 mandates rigid schedules for nutrition and meals, as well as exercise, work, and study periods. Classrooms appear well stocked with educational materials and technology. The Nevada Joint Union High School District provides a teacher and an aide in the classrooms. Agree.
F6:
Consistent with the recommendations of the 2005-2006 Grand Jury Report, eyewash stations have been installed, a camera was added in the exercise area, and additional razor wire was installed atop the outer perimeter fence.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6:
Consistent with the recommendations of the 2005-2006 Grand Jury Report, eyewash stations have been installed, a camera was added in the exercise area, and additional razor wire was installed atop the outer perimeter fence. Agree. H:\SUPERVISORS STAFF\BOARD SUPPORT\Grand Jury\GJ0607\Juv.Hall-BOS Responses.DOC of4 09/11/07
F7:
The Nevada County Juvenile Hall contracts with Amador, Calaveras, Sierra, Tuolumne, and Plumas Counties to house their juvenile wards.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7:
The Nevada County Juvenile Hall contracts with Amador, Calaveras. Sierra, Tuolumne, and Plumas Counties to house their juvenile wards. Agree.
F8:
Each ward receives the benefit of personalized counseling and supervision by an assigned Group Supervisor, who serve as both counseling and correctional officer.
Related Recommendations (1)
R8:
Each ward receives the benefit of personalized counseling and supervision by an assigned Group Supervisor, who serve as both counseling and correctional officer. Agree.
F9:
At the time of inspection, the facility had 18 authorized Level I and II Group Supervisor positions of which there were five were open.
Related Recommendations (1)
R9:
At the time of inspection, the facility had 18 authorized Level I and II Group Supervisor positions ofwhich there were five were [sic] open. Agree. It should be noted that at the time of this response the vacancies were reduced to two open positions.
F10:
Active recruitment for Group Supervisors is constant due to a high turnover rate.
Related Recommendations (1)
R10:
Active recruitment for Group Supervisors is constant due to a high turnover rate. Agree.
F11:
Salary considerations and college unit requirements make this employment less attractive than other county law enforcement positions.
Related Recommendations (1)
R11:
Salary considerations and college unit requirements make this employment less attractive than other county law enforcement positions. Partially agree. At the time of the inspection the salary was below the labor market, making it difficult to recruit and retain staff. The salary for the classification has now been adjusted through the collective bargaining process to be competitive in the labor market and vacancies are now being filled.
F12:
Supervision of incarcerated juveniles can be more difficult and dangerous than adult inmates.
Related Recommendations (1)
R12:
Supervision of incarcerated juveniles can be more difficult and dangerous than adult inmates. Disagree. The County understands the safety issues surrounding the duties performed by both our Correctional Officers and our Group Supervisors and finds both jobs to be difficult and dangerous.
F13:
The following table illustrates the disparity in current salaries and educational requirements for law enforcement positions with Nevada County. Salary and Educational Requirements Juvenile Hall Group Supervisor Level I Level II $2264-2764/mo $2502-3054/mo 30 college units Same plus 1 yr experience in related fields Probation Assistant Level I Level II $2264-2764/mo $2502-3054/mo 30 college units 1 yr experience in related fields or 60 college units WBCF Correctional Officer Level I Level II $2750-3558/mo $3039-3710/mo High School Diploma or GED plus coursework or Same plus supplemental education, training and one experience in related fields year experience Sheriff’s Deputy Level I Level II $3384-4141/mo $3739-4564/mo High School Diploma Same plus 1 yr experience Table information extracted from County employment brochures - 2 - | Pa ge CONCLUSIONS
Related Recommendations (1)
R13:
The following table illustrates the disparity in current salaries and educational requirements for law enforcement positions with Nevada County: H:\SUPERVISORS STAFF\BOARD SUPPORT\Grand Jury\GJ0607\Juv.Hall-BOS Responses,DOC of4 09/11/07 Salary and Educational Requirements Juvenile Hall Group Supervisor Level I Level II $2264-2764/mo $2502-3054/mo 30 college units Same plus 1 yr experience in related fields Probation Assistant Level I Level II $2264-2764/mo $2502-3054/mo 30 college units I yr experience in related fields or 60 college units WBCF Correctional Officer Levell Level II $2750-3558/mo $3039-3710/mo High School Diploma or GED plus Same plus supplemental education, training coursework or experience in related fields and one year experience Sheriff's Deputy Level I Level II $3384-41411mo $3739-4564/mo High School Diploma Same plus 1 yr experience Table information extractedfrom County employment brochures Partially agree. The table was prepared using salary schedules in effect at the time ofthe inspection. Since that time a new contract has been reached with many ofthe units represented in the chart. To that end the Group Supervisors' salaries have increased. As there was no change to the education requirements the table below includes only salary information. Also, comparing the Group Supervisor to the Deputy Sheriff would not be an appropriate comparison as the job specifications and duties are entirely different. In addition to the above it should be noted that all benefits offered to all groups, with the exception of the Deputy Sheriff, are the same. Juvenile Hall Group Supervisor Levell Level II $2736 -$3341 $3023 -$3691 Probation Assistant Levell Level II $2736 - $3341 $3023 - $3691 WBCF Correctional Officer Levell Level II $3115 - $3803 $3442 -$4202 Sheriff's Deputy Levell Level II $3500 - $4272 $3867 -$4721 H:\SUPERVISORS STAFFIBOARD SUPPORT\Grand Jury\GJ0607\Juv.Hall-BOS Responses.DOC of4 09111/07 The difference in Group Supervisor and Correctional Officer pay was reduced from 21 % to 13.8% based on the 2007 market study prepared by Bryce Consulting, Inc. The survey compared Nevada County salaries to those in Mendocino, Sutter, Butte, El Dorado, and Placer Counties. The mean of the five county salaries resulted in the current pay for Group Supervisors and Correctional Officers. The market data did not show pay parity for Group Supervisors and Correctional Officers in the five counties surveyed. B. RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION The Board of Supervisors should undertake action to achieve greater parity in salaries between Juvenile Hall Group Supervisors and Wayne Brown Correctional Officers. The recommendation will not be implemented at this time. The 2007 market study prepared by Bryce Consulting, Inc.; which compared job descriptions, educational requirements and experience requirements for Group Supervisors and Correctional Officers with five other jurisdictions, did not support pay parity for these classifications. With regard to the Grand Jury's Conclusions #3-6, we believe the salary differential between Group Supervisor and Wayne Brown Correctional Officer does not preclude achieving a stable staffing level of qualified personnel at Juvenile Hall. At the time of this response the vacancies for Group Supervisor have been reduced from five to two vacancies, with an active recruitment currently underway. In 07/08 a Senior Deputy Probation Officer was added to Juvenile Hall staffing to assist with Juvenile Hall operations. It was not the difference in the salaries between Group Supervisor and Correctional Officer that caused the recruitment issue in the Juvenile Hall; rather it was the fact that the salary for Group Supervisors was significantly lower than those in comparable positions in other comparable jurisdictions. Bringing Group Supervisor salaries to market levels is currently assisting with recruitments at the Juvenile Hall and it is estimated that this will also reduce turnover. In addition, every attempt to honor time off requests and individual staff needs is undertaken. Part time, on-call staff is utilized to fill open or vacant shifts. Also" many people choose to work in a juvenile detention facility as a matter of personal choice or philosophical belief, and the salary differential between Group Supervisors and Correctional Officers is not a consideration. H:\SUPERVISORS STAFF\BOARD SUPPORT\Grand Jury\GJ0607Vuv.Hall·BOS Responses.DOC of4 09111107
Quick View
Full Details →
Findings and recommendations not yet extracted.
Quick View
Full Details →
Findings & Recommendations
13 findings
F1:
The Academy was properly established in 1996 based on extant perceptions of the local labor market and local sponsors in the telecommunications industry.
F2:
Nevada Joint Union High School District (NJUHSD) does not have a district policy that governs and defines Partnership Academies within the district.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2:
Nevada Joint Union High School District should promulgate a district policy directive on Partnership Academies to include, but not necessarily be limited to: a. A clear, concise mission statement b. Procedures to identify all eligible “at risk” (Ed Code §§54690 and 54691) students c. Procedures to select individual students d. A protocol to achieve academy balance between “at risk and general student populations” e. Expectations of student performance and participation f. Protocols for waivers and exceptions g. Standards for appropriate mentor interactions h. A process for on-site cooperation among Academy staff, counselors, department heads, and ninth grade teachers
F3:
The Academy submits an annual report to the CDE, which has been reviewed and approved by the site principal and the district coordinator. Funding from the CDE for the previous year is based on acceptance of the annual report.
F4:
The Academy has passed multiple on-site inspections and written reviews by the CDE.
F5:
The Academy has maintained a close and responsive relationship with the CDE program coordinator.
F6:
The Ed Code states: “The staff of each academy shall select students …” Ed Code §54695 (c).
F7:
The Ed Code states: “The ninth grade teachers and counselors … shall identify students eligible to participate in an academy.” Ed Code §54695 (a).
F8:
It has been difficult to obtain appropriate mentors, with appropriate safeguards for student safety. The Academy has responded with a format that could best be described as “career day” presentations. Academy staff is actively seeking more mentors, but local telecommunications industry resources have significantly declined since the original charter.
F9:
Academy staff factually reported actual mentor hours (45) provided during the 2005- 2006 school year. When interviewed, complainants admitted they had not read the annual report.
F10:
The 2005-2006 annual report disclosed three students received telecommunications internships, and 34 were employed in paid jobs or other work experience, an authorized variance under Ed Code §54692(b) (5).
F11:
Ed Code §54692 (b)(5)(f) states: “Whenever practical, the (common) planning period should be in addition to the normal planning period for full-time teachers, and be supported as a part of the district’s matching funds.” Provision of an extra planning period is an itemized milestone for compliance in the annual report.
F12:
Stipends for Academy teachers were determined by a logical derivation from standard comparable stipends; were approved by the site principal, district Personnel and Business Divisions; and finally ratified by NJUHSD Board of Trustees in open session on September 20, 2006. In addition, the stipends were awarded in lieu of statutory and authorized planning periods in order to save grant funds.
F13:
Complainants’ issues have been raised before, and answered by, successive site principals, district personnel, NJUHSD Board of Trustees, and CDE. CONCLUSIONS
Additional Recommendations
1
Not linked to specific findings.
R1:
Nevada Union High School should consider adding additional Partnership Academies to focus on alternate career fields.
Quick View
Full Details →
Findings & Recommendations
10 findings
F1:
WBCF was opened in 1992 and currently has a total capacity of 250 beds.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1:
Again, the Grand Jury recommends additional security cameras be installed, particularly in public areas.
F2:
At the time of inspection, August 31, 2006, the average daily population was 185. There were 26 female inmates but only 16 beds available in the female section.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2:
For safety and efficiency, the Grand Jury renews its recommendation that arraignments be conducted utilizing available video equipment.
F3:
Space limitations, current inmate classification requirements, and the dramatic increase in female population necessitates some females being housed in the minimum-security dormitory-style wing, and sharing a recreation room area with male inmates.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3:
The County should consider locating a courtroom inside WBCF. Sheriff’s Substation at Truckee
F4:
All inmates are assigned to housing units and activities using California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 15 Classification Plan. Classification is based on gender, age, criminal sophistication, seriousness of crime charged, physical or mental health needs, assaultive/non-assaultive behavior and other criteria, which provides for safety of inmates and staff.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4:
The hallway is not always cleared of people when inmates are moved to the courtrooms, exposing the public, inmates, and deputies to risk. This finding was also reported in the 1998-1999 and 2001-2002 Grand Jury Reports. Partially agree. The hallways are cleared as best we can. Safety and security ofthe public, staff, and inmates are our highest priority. We could find no mention ofthe hallways not being cleared in the Grand Jury Court Holding Facility Reports for 1998-1999, or 2001-2002. There was mention ofthere being no surveillance cameras in the hallway areas in those reports.
F5:
Inmates are assigned housing based on available number of distinct housing units or cells in the facility. 1 | P a g e
Related Recommendations (1)
R5:
There are few security cameras in the public areas where deputies escort inmates to the courtrooms and do not cover the entire area. There is wiring for cameras in many locations, but the cameras have been removed. This finding was also reported in the 1998-1999 and 2001-2002 Grand Jury Reports. Disagree. There are no cameras in the public areas ofthe Courthouse. The wiring spoken ofis in the secure area ofthe old jail. The cameras were removed when the jail was vacated.
F6:
WBCF was built with expansion in mind. Land, facilities, plumbing and power hookups are in place to expand capacity to 450 inmates.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6:
All doors are alarmed but not all can be viewed by a security camera. This finding was also reported in 1998-1999 and 2001-2002 Grand Jury Reports. Partially agree. The doors are alarmed. No exterior doors have security cameras viewing them.
F7:
Option One - “new female housing unit with new centralized visitor center”; Option Two - “new male housing unit with new centralized visitor center”; and Option Three - “remodel only, add housing units inside the existing jail.” 9. In 2006 4,216 inmates, 3,458 male and 758 female, were transported between WBCF and the courthouse. Another 405 inmates were transported to the courts in Truckee. 10. There is a closed circuit video system installed linking WBCF to the courts in Truckee and Nevada City but it is not utilized. CONCLUSIONS 1. The available housing units prevent complete segregation of male and female inmates. 2. Current proximity of male and female inmates in the minimum-security area creates a serious risk of liability to the county. 3. Option One under the Needs Assessment “new female housing unit with new centralized visitor center” would give WBCF a total of 259 male beds and 84 female beds which would meet the primary need noted in Finding 7.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7:
To avoid transporting prisoners a closed circuit video system is in place, linking the Nevada City and Truckee courts to WBCF. Partially agree. H:ISUPERVISORS STAFFIBOARD SUPPORnGrand JurylGJ06071Correctional Fac-BOS Responses.DOC of5 09/11/07 The system is used between the Truckee court and WBCF but not between the Nevada City courts and WBCF.
F8:
The Needs Assessment offered three options to address the primary need noted in Finding 7: Option One - “new female housing unit with new centralized visitor center”; Option Two - “new male housing unit with new centralized visitor center”; and Option Three - “remodel only, add housing units inside the existing jail.”
Related Recommendations (1)
R8:
The closed circuit video system is not utilized. Agree.
F9:
In 2006 4,216 inmates, 3,458 male and 758 female, were transported between WBCF and the courthouse. Another 405 inmates were transported to the courts in Truckee.
Related Recommendations (1)
R9:
In 2006, 4,216 inmates were transported from WBCF to the courthouse holding cells. Agree.
F10:
There is a closed circuit video system installed linking WBCF to the courts in Truckee and Nevada City but it is not utilized. CONCLUSIONS
Related Recommendations (1)
R10:
A finding in the 2001-2002 Grand Jury Report stated, "Nevada County is one of the few counties in California that does not have a courtroom inside their correctional facility." Both the Sheriff and the Board of Supervisors (BOS) agreed to the finding but stated, "...a closed circuit video system for arraignment has been installed at WBCF." Partially disagree. A survey of California counties on this topic generated twenty-one responses. Of those responding, only two counties, Merced and Sacramento, have courtrooms in their adult correctional facilities. In the counties surveyed, it was more often the case for counties to have a courtroom in their juvenile hall facility. Many ofthe counties surveyed use video arraignment to reduce the number of transports to the courthouse. The counties who responded were Alameda, Butte, Contra Costa, Humboldt, Kern, Merced, Monterey, Napa, Sacramento, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz, Shasta, Sonoma, Sutter, Tehama, Yolo, and Yuba. B. RESPONSES TO RECOMMENDATIONS
Additional documents
Documents found alongside this year's reports — not grand jury reports or responses.