Mendocino County Grand Jury
• 2001-2002
The Mentally Ill—A New Approach to Crisis Services In October 2001, the Department of Mental Health (dmh) opened an
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 22 findings
F1
While causing concern in the County, many saw the closure of the locked PHF as an opportunity for change. The loss of the PHF triggered a comprehensive re-evaluation of the delivery system of help to the mentally ill, especially to those in crisis. Numerous stakeholders were brought together to examine the system in place, research the latest practices in the field, and explore the various options for possible change.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
On July 17, 2001, the DMH submitted a staff report on mental health services in the County. The nine-page report summarized various possible solutions. The recommendations were: close the PHF and create the CSC, adopt a community-based Adult Systems of Care model, assign mental health workers to the Jail, increase staff for case management, and continue to use out-of-county contract mental health treatment facilities. In addition the County would take over the operation of a residential recovery center, Casa de Marta, in Ukiah, and provide for quick response crisis workers to hospitals, Jail, or other places in the community needing their services. The new plan, with the CSC as an important component, would result in a community based program, a “recovery model” with case management to bring together available resources, including patient advocacy groups, to provide each case with a range of services and continuing follow-up.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
The BOS approved the plan, which the County Administrative Office described as “a major shift in the delivery of mental health services in our community.” County administrative employees recognized that the changes would require a great deal of effort to overcome resistance and for various departments and clients to work together to make the new system successful.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
An important piece in the new system is the Memo of Understanding between the DMH, the Sheriff, the three city police departments, and the three hospitals in the County whose emergency rooms will be receiving people in mental health crisis. The document, effective October 1, 2001, establishes the protocols for the assessment and care of persons exhibiting signs of mental illness who come into contact with law enforcement.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
DMH, law enforcement, and hospital staff, do not meet regularly to share knowledge and procedures. Agencies confer on a case-by-case basis.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
The CSC, located at 860 North Bush Street in Ukiah, in the government complex, went into full operation in the middle of October 2001.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
The CSC is open and staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Participation of clients is voluntary and there are some beds for overnight “time-out” stays if necessary.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
A CSC worker’s duties include evaluation, intervention, placement at a contract psychiatric hospital for 72-hour evaluation under §5150, and planning for discharge from the center to follow-up services.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
The policy statement for the CSC includes job descriptions for all staff, definition and philosophy of the recovery model concept of treatment, and details of operations.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
State regulations require the County to provide a Patient Rights Advocate. The patient rights advocate office is now in the CSC, a partial implementation of a 2000-2001 Grand Jury recommendation.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
The CSC has developed a transportation system to drive clients to out of county psychiatric facilities thus relieving the sheriff from that duty except when the client requires a law enforcement escort. These workers will also have other duties at the center.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
The CSC is officially designated under State of California guidelines as a Community Mental Health Clinic in which client services are billed under Medi-Cal regulations. It is anticipated that the final costs to the County could be reduced while at the same time providing better services to the mentally ill.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
Records indicate that as many as one in four inmates housed at the Jail have mental health issues. When the PHF was closed, officers no longer had a secure facility to leave people who needed evaluation. Patrol Officers reported being out of normal service while they waited for mental health crises workers to respond to hospital emergency rooms to evaluate and assume custody of the client. In addition, mental health or law enforcement staff time had to be increased to transport patients to out of county psychiatric facilities.
No recommendations for this finding
F14
With the assignment of DMH personnel to the Jail and the ability of the CSC to send crisis workers to the jail after regular working hours, Jail workers believe the treatment of inmates with mental health issues has improved.
No recommendations for this finding
F15
There is a strong connection between mental illness and substance abuse. Clients in crisis typically exhibit a multitude of problems in addition to the ones that have brought them to the immediate crises. These include homelessness, health, employment, and childcare. DMH has recognized the multiple layers of need with the creation of a new position, Consumer Services Coordinator, with the job of ensuring that the clients receive the help needed from whatever source is available. However, some clients exhibiting aberrant behavior are sometimes shuffled back and forth between AODP and DMH.
No recommendations for this finding
F16
With the PHF no longer available, the need for costly transportation of patients out of the county has increased. Both the Sheriff and the DMH have standby transportation staff and/or ambulances available (if restraint is required) to transport patients to out-of-county psychiatric facilities.
No recommendations for this finding
F17
Redwood Coast Regional Center, DMH, and the Sheriff are collaborating in a unique grant-funded training program to bring more understanding of the relationship of law enforcement and the developmentally disabled and the mentally ill. A private training group from the Bay Area has been conducting the training.
No recommendations for this finding
F18
DMH has in place tools for evaluation, such as the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire and the California Quality of Life instrument. The Mental Health Board is planning to evaluate client satisfaction. Coast Crisis Services
No recommendations for this finding
F19
The Grand Jury has heard testimony that the impact of the new procedures on Fort Bragg and the coastal areas of the County have been mixed. The Fort Bragg area had in place, prior to the closure of the PHF, a system for crisis response that has not changed. The Fort Bragg office of the DMH has employees to respond to crisis calls Monday to Friday 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. The County has a contract with Ford Street Project, a private non-profit human service organization, to provide crisis response during all other times. DMH supervisors are available for telephone consultation with the Ford Street crisis workers. The Ford Street Project also provides three beds for “time-out” cases in the same situations now available at the CSC. The primary change has been for §5150 cases, which require a custodial setting. Information from crisis workers on the coast indicates without a PHF, it sometimes takes longer to find a placement for persons who must be detained under §5150 because they must be taken out of the county.
No recommendations for this finding
F20
There are currently three on-call crisis workers who are employed in other human service jobs. They participate in continual training and case conferences and are supervised by on-call DMH personnel. Often the crisis workers have extensive prior knowledge of the client and the needs of the case, thus facilitating decision-making.
No recommendations for this finding
F21
Other partners in the process, law enforcement and hospital medical staff, at times, question the qualifications and decisions made by the crisis workers. On the other hand, crisis workers feel that police officers and emergency room staff do not understand the requirements and consequences of a §5150 detention nor the difficulty in diagnosing a mental disorder.
No recommendations for this finding
F22
There is no licensed holding cell or room on the coast. At times a patient will be held at the Sheriff’s substation in Fort Bragg or by the Fort Bragg Police, perhaps in the back of a patrol car, until a crises worker arrives.
No recommendations for this finding
Comments 1
-
CO1The Grand jury believes that the criminal justice system, the Jail in particular, is not an effective venue for the treatment of behavior that might violate a criminal statute, but with cause rooted in illness that can be treated. Yet the Grand Jury acknowledges that under our present system, the criminal justice system will continue to be involved with the mentally ill. Mendocino County should be commended for making these changes with the expectation that the need for criminal justice intervention will be significantly reduced and that successful client outcomes be improved. The CSC is an evolving and expanding concept. Response Required Mendocino County Board of Supervisors Mendocino County Sheriff Ukiah City Council Fort Bragg City Council Willits City Council Response Requested Department of Mental Health Director Ukiah Police Chief Fort Bragg Police Chief Willits Police Chief 2001-2002 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report 21 AODP Director 2001-2002 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report 22