📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Los Angeles County Grand Jury • 2009-2010

Child Abuse Reporting and Response

17 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 6 findings

F1 Page 20
The SCAR system does not currently have a good method of tracking the sources of SCARs e.g., schools and hospitals. This would be helpful in historical comparisons to determine where training and education should take place.
F2 Page 20
The E-SCAR grant is scheduled to terminate June 30, 2010. There would be funds still available within the grant. This can be extended by the CEO.
F3 Page 20
There is a concern that law enforcement officers are not aware of the need to make SCAR reports in cases of child endangerment. The case of a DUI arrestee with a small child in a vehicle is an example that needs to be reported and more thoroughly investigated by both DCFS and law enforcement.
F4 Page 20
There remain a number of improvements to E-SCARs to be made. These include the handling of rerouted E-SCARs, proper contact individuals, the roles of the users and E-SCAR search capabilities. 2009-2010 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT 11 DCFS
F5 Page 21
An insufficient number of Human Service Aides are used to augment the efforts of the social workers.
F6 Page 21
DCFS co-location with law enforcement appears to have benefits toward improving child abuse response and investigation effectiveness

Recommendations 9

Agency Responses 1

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.