📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Los Angeles County Grand Jury • 2016-2017

Make Invsetments that Transform Lives

Published: June 05, 2017 123 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings and Recommendations 28 findings

F1 Page 377
Pattern of inebriated inmates held in sobering cell beyond 6 hours without approval of watch commander or transfer to hospital
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Page 277
The BOS should retain a competent management and consulting firm to implement the 2009- 2010 CGJ recommendations to develop a county videoconferencing hub system that could be the platform for video arraignments and appearances. (Findings 1, 10, 19, 20, 21, 14, 21, 22)
F2 Page 377
Jail Log is handwritten, with confusing and unreadable entries
Related Recommendations (2)
R7
Page 278
The Sheriff should recommend the location of a courthouse adjacent to the new MCJ to be completed in 2024-2025. (Findings 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13, 18, 22)
R8
Page 278
The BOS should recommend the location of a courthouse adjacent to the new MCJ to be completed in 2024-2025. (Findings 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13, 18, 22)
F3 Page 377
Pattern of no female jailer(s) or matrons on duty to monitor inebriated female inmates
No recommendations for this finding
F4 Page 377
Jail Manual out of date
No recommendations for this finding
F5 Page 377
Plumbing problem in cell sink
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Page 278
The Sheriff should contract with an experienced and competent management consulting company familiar with Law and Justice practices to review the Sheriff’s data collection and management capabilities and its ability to produce a wide variety of management reports quickly. It should also examine means to improve the interface with the LA City and court systems. The review should recommend upgrades and replacement of existing data management programs as well as indicate the necessary time, material and staff resources to accomplish this improvement. (Findings 5, 6, 14)
F6 Page 377
Cameras removed in Cell Gallery and processing room
No recommendations for this finding
F7 Page 377
Improper and inadequate signage in jail holding area 2016-2017 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT 345
No recommendations for this finding
F8 Page 378
No first aid kit in jail
No recommendations for this finding
F9 Page 378
No evidence of annual environmental inspections
No recommendations for this finding
F10 Page 378
Strong odor in jail area
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Page 278
The BOS should recommend the use of videoconferencing court appearances for the mentally ill, “No-Go” medical and physically handicapped inmates. (Findings 10, 22)
F11 Page 378
Porcelain toilets in cells
No recommendations for this finding
F12 Page 378
No privacy curtain in shower area
No recommendations for this finding
F13 Page 378
No padding in sobering cell
No recommendations for this finding
F14 Page 379
Visitor Reservation Kiosk in MCJ Main Lobby is frequently out of service
No recommendations for this finding
F15 Page 379
No defibrillators are in cell blocks. Crash Carts are used, sometimes with added 5-6 minute response delay.
Related Recommendations (1)
R9
Page 278
LAPD Chief of Police should implement Recommendation #4 of the 2009-2010 CGJ70 in order to facilitate the operation of a videoconferencing program with particular attention to ensuring privacy for defendant and attorney conferences. (Finding 15)
F16 Page 379
Courthouse was built in 1954 shows severe deterioration and is in need of replacement
Related Recommendations (3)
R5
Page 278
The Sheriff should renegotiate its contract with LAPD to not transport inmates without proof of a completed case filing with the court. (Findings 16, 17, 18)
R6
Page 278
The Los Angeles City Attorney should make sure that a case filing is complete before an arrestee is transported to court. (Findings 16, 17) 69 Orange County Court, Santa Ana, Interview with Bench, 3/13/17 266 2016-2017 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT
R10
Page 278
LAPD should expedite the discovery process for misdemeanor narcotic cases in order to participate in video arraignments. (Finding 16) VI REQUIRED RESPONSES California Penal Code Sections 933(c) and 933.05 require a written response to all recommendations contained in this report. Responses shall be made no later than ninety (90) days after the Civil Grand Jury publishes its report and files it with the Clerk of the Court. Responses shall be made in accord with Penal Code Sections 933.05 (a) and (b). All responses to the recommendations of the 2016-2017 Civil Grand Jury must be submitted on or before September 30, 2017, to: Presiding Judge Los Angeles County Superior Court Clara Shortridge Foltz Criminal Justice Center 210 West Temple Street, Eleventh Floor-Room 11-506 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Responses are required from: Responding Agency Recommendations County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors 17.1, 17.4, 17.8 County of Los Angeles District Attorney 17.3 County of Los Angeles Sheriff 17.2, 17.5, 17.7 City Attorney, Los Angeles 17.6 Los Angeles City Chief of Police 17.9, 17.10 70 2009-2010 CGJ Final Report, pg. 80 2016-2017 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT 267 VII ACRONYMS ACLU American Civil Liberties Union APD Alternate Public Defender BOS Board of Supervisors CCJCC Countywide Criminal Justice Coordinating Committee CGJ 2016-2017 Los Angeles County Civil Grand Jury CRDF Century Regional Detention Facility DA District Attorney EEC Los Angeles County Citizens Economy & Efficiency Commission LAPD Los Angeles Police Department SHERIFF Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department MCJ Men’s Central Jail MOU Memorandum of Understanding PD Public Defender PEMC Project Evaluation and Management Committee SCAQMD Southern California Air Quality Management District VIII COMMITTEE MEMBERS Gerard Duiker Chair Sharon Muravez Co-Chair 268 2016-2017 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT ARE YOU GETTING LESS THAN WHAT YOU PAY FOR? Regi Block Chair Dorothy Brown Hilda Dallal Ronnie Dann-Honor Marilyn Gelfand Dianne Kelley ARE YOU GETTING LESS THAN WHAT YOU PAY FOR? I SUMMARY Los Angeles County does not have a Package Inspection Program in place and as such is unable to adequately oversee its responsibility for inspecting and testing consumer packaged goods. Other counties in the state have Package Inspection Programs codified in their ordinances to cover program costs and to set out procedures and standards. The Federal Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (ACT) requires manufacturers and packagers to provide a statement on packaged items identifying, among other things, the quantity contained therein.1 Pursuant to the ACT, consumers in Los Angeles County are guaranteed protection and should expect that what is stated on the outside of a commodity label is actually what is on the inside of the package. The ACT provides uniform standards to be followed throughout the nation for commodity labeling and packaging while delegating oversight to the states. The State of California, in turn, hands over the job of oversight to the counties within the state, specifically each county “Sealer.”2,3 In Los Angeles County the County Sealer is the Director of the Department of Weights & Measures. Focusing on the consumers’ rights to fair packaging, committee members of the 2016-2017 Civil Grand Jury (CGJ) explored and researched Los Angeles County Office of the Agricultural Commissioner/Director of Weights and Measures (Weights & Measures) with their attention on consumers’ rights to fair packaging and labeling. This resulted in the following observations:
F17 Page 379
Numerous deficiencies in access, efficiency, security, overcrowding and ADA compliance
No recommendations for this finding
F18 Page 379
Insecure movement of juveniles in public hallways to and from courtrooms
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Page 278
The DA should implement a Swing Shift (Noon to 8:00 pm) within the Charge Evaluation Division to process late case filings, thereby avoiding the release of inmates from court for incomplete filings. (Finding 18)
F19 Page 379
Seriously neglected maintenance and repairs in holding cells. Much graffiti
No recommendations for this finding
F20 Page 380
Clean and paint walls
No recommendations for this finding
F21 Page 379
Floors are severely worn
No recommendations for this finding
F22 Page 379
Many plumbing problems
No recommendations for this finding
F23 Page 380
Dirty walls in holding cells area
No recommendations for this finding
F24 Page 380
Plumbing in disrepair
No recommendations for this finding
F25 Page 380
Ceiling is damaged because of water leaks
No recommendations for this finding
F26 Page 380
Temporary padding attached to walls in gymnasium, exposing beams and pipes
No recommendations for this finding
F27 Page 380
Two escapes this year at a perimeter block wall with no razor-wire
No recommendations for this finding
F28 Page 380
No defibrillators at the facility, even though requested in the past
No recommendations for this finding

Additional Recommendations 18

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.