⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 6 findings
F1
The specifications, contract and construction documents for affordable housing was found to be in order and the City of Thousand Oaks was fully compliant with all legal and mandated requirements. No documented noise abatement variances were discovered.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Based on the available documents, the contractor, sub-contractor and noise analysis consultant performed their tasks in full compliance with the specifications and construction documents.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
No variance or discrepancies in the window and noise abatement measures were found to exist in the building.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
No other condominium resident had any noise complaints.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
The condominium in question was provided with double pane glass on those windows that face the freeway as a result of previous complaints.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
All of the buyers of condominiums in the building signed a Notice Of Disclosure that described the noise level that would exist inside the apartment areas due to proximity to the freeway. CONCLUSION The 1995/96 Grand Jury investigation concludes that the City of Thousand Oaks did not allow a variance and has no further obligation to mitigate ambient noise levels within the building. 58
No recommendations for this finding