Score: -10
(3/4/13)
Santa Clara County Grand Jury
• 2022-2023
If You Only Read the Ballot, You’re Being Duped
Published: October 07, 2022
24 pages
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 1 findings
F1
The Civil Grand Jury finds that in the current environment, which is unregulated at the local level, it is easy for the author of a ballot measure question to write the question in a way that is confusing or misleading to voters.
Related Recommendations (6)
R1a
The Board of Supervisors should ask the County Counsel to review all ballot questions submitted to it pursuant to Recommendation 1b.
R1b
Governing entities2 within Santa Clara County should voluntarily submit their ballot questions to the County Counsel for review prior to submission to the Registrar of Voters, unless and until
R1c
Governing entities3 within Santa Clara County should, by March 31, 2023, adopt their own resolution or ordinance to require submission of their ballot questions to the County Counsel for review prior to submission to the Registrar of Voters, unless and until Recommendations 1d and 1e are implemented.
R1d
The County should create an independent, citizen-led oversight commission like the recommended Good Governance in Ballots Commission as described in the “Solutions” section of this report. The Commission should be implemented by August 1, 2024. There are approximately 50 governing entities within Santa Clara County. The Civil Grand Jury has elected to address these recommendations to the County, cities, and a select number of special districts and school districts that have historically the most measures on the ballot for response. The Civil Grand Jury encourages all governing entities to adopt these recommendations. Id.
R1e
Governing entities4 within Santa Clara County should submit their ballot questions for review by the Good Governance in Ballots Commission pursuant to Recommendation 1d.
R1f
The County should, by March 31, 2023, take appropriate action to request that the state legislature consider amending current law to require the County Counsel to review and approve local ballot measure questions before they are voted on. Id.
Conclusions 4
-
CL1 Page 18The Civil Grand Jury finds that in the current environment, which is unregulated at the local level, it is easy for the author of a ballot measure question to write the question in a way that is confusing or misleading to voters.
-
CL2 Page 17Civil Grand Juries are charged to help government develop practical solutions to improve government operations. Poorly worded ballot questions may not be illegal, but if they withhold information to shield what is really at issue, they are unethical. There are insufficient workable checks and balances to prevent this ongoing issue from being curtailed. Not doing anything about this only adds to the distrust of government. The Civil Grand Jury recommends that elected officials be held accountable—ballot questions must be transparent and clear in order to enable today’s voters to make informed decisions. The Civil Grand Jury wants governing entities to know that the public is paying attention and will not tolerate questions that are anything less than truthful, impartial, and fair. Further, ballot measure questions need to be straightforward, understandable, transparent, and honest.
-
CL3 Page 18FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Finding 1 The Civil Grand Jury finds that in the current environment, which is unregulated at the local level, it is easy for the author of a ballot measure question to write the question in a way that is confusing or misleading to voters. Recommendation 1a The Board of Supervisors should ask the County Counsel to review all ballot questions submitted to it pursuant to Recommendation 1b. Recommendation 1b Governing entities2 within Santa Clara County should voluntarily submit their ballot questions to the County Counsel for review prior to submission to the Registrar of Voters, unless and until Recommendation 1d is implemented. Recommendation 1c Governing entities3 within Santa Clara County should, by March 31, 2023, adopt their own resolution or ordinance to require submission of their ballot questions to the County Counsel for review prior to submission to the Registrar of Voters, unless and until Recommendations 1d and 1e are implemented. Recommendation 1d The County should create an independent, citizen-led oversight commission like the recommended Good Governance in Ballots Commission as described in the “Solutions” section of this report. The Commission should be implemented by August 1, 2024. 2 There are approximately 50 governing entities within Santa Clara County. The Civil Grand Jury has elected to address these recommendations to the County, cities, and a select number of special districts and school districts that have historically the most measures on the ballot for response. The Civil Grand Jury encourages all governing entities to adopt these recommendations. 3 Id.
-
CL4 Page 19Recommendation 1e Governing entities4 within Santa Clara County should submit their ballot questions for review by the Good Governance in Ballots Commission pursuant to Recommendation 1d. Recommendation 1f The County should, by March 31, 2023, take appropriate action to request that the state legislature consider amending current law to require the County Counsel to review and approve local ballot measure questions before they are voted on. 4 Id.
Agency Responses 19
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.
▶
City of Campbell
December 09, 2022
•
3 pages
View Details ▾
No structured response data extracted yet.
View the PDF for full details.
▶
City of Cupertino
December 21, 2022
•
2 pages
• 2 responses
View Details ▾
2 responses to findings and recommendations
R1b
Governing entities within Santa Clara County should voluntarily submit their ballot questions to the County Counsel for review prior to submission to the Registrar of Voters, unless and until Recommendation 1d is implemented.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
, above.
Recommendation 1e
Governing entities within Santa Clara County should submit their ballot questions for review by the Good Governance in Ballots Commission pursuant to Recommendation 1d. City Response - Not Applicable. As noted in the Grand Jury Report, Recommendation 1d is inconsistent with state law. The City of Cupertino has no ability to implement Recommendation 1e absent a change in state law.
R1d
City Response - Not Applicable. As noted in the Grand Jury Report,
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Recommendation 1d is implemented.
▶
City of Gilroy
December 22, 2022
•
3 pages
• 2 responses
•
Score: -1
(+0, 0, -1)
View Details ▾
2 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
If You Only Read the Ballot, You're Being Duped
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
The City of Gilroy disagrees with the finding that the writing of ballot measures at the local level is unregulated. All ballot measure questions are reviewed and approved by the Gilroy City Council and subject to State Law. In addition, there is a judicial remedy available by State Law.
4 The main concern raised by the SCCCGJ report focuses on Measure A submitted by Valley Water. The City of Gilroy, therefore, disagrees that additional restrictions and oversight of the City of Gilroy by the County of Santa Clara are necessary and does not support the removal of local control.
Recommendation...
R1d
1f. The County should take appropriate action to request that the state legislature consider amending current law to require the County Counsel to review and approve local ballot measure questions before they are voted on. CONTINUITY REPORT
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Recommendation 1d is implemented.
▶
City of Los Altos
November 15, 2022
•
2 pages
• 2 responses
•
Score: -1
(+0, 0, -1)
View Details ▾
2 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
If You Only Read the Ballot, You're Being Duped
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
The Civil Grand Jury finds that in the current environment, which is unregulated at the local level, it is easy for the author of a ballot measure question to write the question in a way that is confusing or misleading to voters. Response 1: Respondent, City of Los Altos, disagrees with the finding that the writing of ballot measures at the local level is unregulated. All ballot measure questions for respondent are approved by the elected City Council of the City of Los Altos and subject to State Law. Respondent notes that the Civil Grand Jury relies heavily on one ballot measure submitted by ...
R1d
1f. The County should take appropriate action to request that the state legislature consider amending current law to require the County Counsel to review and approve local ballot measure questions before they are voted on. CONTINUITY REPORT
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Recommendation 1d is implemented.
▶
City of Milpitas
October 07, 2022
•
2 pages
• 3 responses
•
Score: -1
(+0, 0, -1)
View Details ▾
3 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
If You Only Read the Ballot, You're Being Duped
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
The City of Milpitas disagrees with the entirety of the Civil Grand Jury's finding that the writing of ballot measures is unregulated at the local level or that authors mislead voters within the City of Milpitas. All ballot measure questions are regulated under the California Elections Code and approved by the Milpitas City Council. Such regulation includes a private right of action for those who disagree with the ballot question associated with any particular ballot measure, and to date, neither the courts nor the State legislature have found that remedy to be inadequate. Measure F, which put...
R1d
1f. The County should take appropriate action to request that the state legislature consider amending current law to require the County Counsel to review and approve local ballot measure questions before they are voted on. CONTINUITY REPORT
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Recommendation 1d is implemented.
F2
Unsportsmanlike Conduct: Santa Clara City Council F1 F1
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City of Milpitas will not implement the recommendation because it is neither reasonable nor warranted. The City of Milpitas is a municipal corporation organized under Article XI of the California Constitution, and it possesses all of the powers inherent thereunder, independent of those powers granted to the County of Santa Clara. The California Elections Code requires that ballot questions to be considered by the electorate of the City of Milpitas are reviewed by the City Attorney. As a result of the nature of the representative system, the voters of the City of Milpitas exercise greater c...
▶
City of Monte Sereno
December 06, 2022
•
2 pages
• 3 responses
•
Score: -1
(+0, 1, -1)
View Details ▾
3 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
- The Civil Grand Jury finds that in the current environment, which is unregulated at the local level, it is easy for the author of a ballot measure question to write the question in a way that is confusing or misleading to voters. Response: The City of Monte Sereno disagrees partially with the finding. Ballot questions are subject to requirements in the Elections Code sections 13119 and 13120, which regulate the form of ballot question and require that the ballot questions be a true and imparti...
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
The City of Monte Sereno disagrees partially with the finding. Ballot questions are subject to requirements in the Elections Code sections 13119 and 13120, which regulate the form of ballot question and require that the ballot questions be a true and impartial synopsis of the measure to be voted on. Ballot questions have often been subject to pre-election litigation to in the event that they are misleading or inaccurate, which serves as a potential check on abuse.
R1b
- Governing entities within Santa Clara County should voluntarily submit their ballot questions to the County Counsel for review prior to submission to the Registrar of Voters, unless and until Recommendation 1d is implemented. Response: Recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or reasonable, with an explanation. The County Counsel does not have jurisdiction to review ballot measures for incorporated cities, and also does not serve as legal counsel to incorporated citie...
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Recommendation 1b - Governing entities within Santa Clara County should voluntarily submit their ballot questions to the County Counsel for review prior to submission to the Registrar of Voters, unless and until Recommendation 1d is implemented.
R1e
- Governing entities within Santa Clara County should submit their ballot questions for review by the Good Governance in Ballots Commission pursuant to Recommendation 1d. Response: This recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or reasonable, with an explanation. The County does not have jurisdiction to review ballot measures for incorporated cities, and thus an oversight commission created by the County would not be an appropriate location to submit ballot questions. Th...
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
This recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or reasonable, with an explanation. The County does not have jurisdiction to review ballot measures for incorporated cities, and thus an oversight commission created by the County would not be an appropriate location to submit ballot questions. This recommendation contravenes applicable law, including the state Elections Code, regarding the placement of election materials on the ballots, and would require City local ballot measures to be submitted to another political subdivision for prior review and approval, contravening...
▶
City of Morgan Hill
December 07, 2022
•
3 pages
• 4 responses
•
Score: -1
(+1, 1, -2)
View Details ▾
4 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
The Civil Grand Jury finds that in the current environment, which is unregulated at the local level, it is easy for the author of a ballot measure question to write the question in a way that is confusing or misleading to voters. CITY RESPONSE TO FINDING 1: Partially Agree Elections Code section 13119 provides the form of question for a local ballot measure: “Shall the measure (stating the nature thereof) be adopted?” The code further provides that the “statement of the measure shall be a true a...
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Partially Agree Elections Code section 13119 provides the form of question for a local ballot measure: "Shall the measure (stating the nature thereof) be adopted?" The code further provides that the "statement of the measure shall be a true and impartial synopsis of the purpose of the proposed measure, and shall be in language that is neither argumentative nor likely to create prejudice for or against the measure." Where a measure is placed on the ballot by a city council, the council has some discretion in preparing the synopsis of the measure and the statement of purpose. But the ballot lang...
R1B
Governing entities within Santa Clara County should voluntarily submit their ballot questions to the County Counsel for review prior to submission to the Registrar of Voters, unless and until Recommendation 1d is implemented.
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or reasonable, and would require a change to California law. The Elections Code currently provides a process to challenge a ballot question when a legislative body abuses its discretion by adopting a question that is misleading or is likely to create prejudice for or against the measure. The Grand Jury has identified significant impediments to utilizing that process, which is set forth in Elections Code section 9295. Those impediments should be addressed by the legislature. Until the legislature enacts Election Code reforms...
R1C
Governing entities within Santa Clara County should, by March 31, 2023, adopt their own resolution or ordinance to require submission of their ballot questions to the County Counsel for review prior to submission to the Registrar of Voters, unless and until Recommendations 1d and 1e are implemented.
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable. Placing a measure on the ballot is already costly and complicated. Adding an additional step to the already cumbersome process is not warranted. However, the City of Morgan Hill will consider consulting with County Counsel's office when there is a question regarding whether a ballot title is appropriate, and there measure. While the ballot question is still subject to approval by the city council, the council has less ability to define the purpose of the measure.
is no potential conflict. Further, the...
R1E
Governing entities within Santa Clara County should submit their ballot questions for review by the Good Governance in Ballots Commission pursuant to Recommendation 1d.
Response: Will Implement
Score: +1
The recommendation has not been implemented, but will be implemented if state law is amended to allow the creation of a commission as described in the Grand Jury report, and 1) cities are required to submit ballot language to such a commission, or 2) a commission is formed that both protects the ability of the City to fairly define the purpose of any ballot measures it submits to the voters and is required to solicit input from and be responsive to the Morgan Hill community. Sincerely, Rich Constantine Mayor
▶
City of Mountain View
December 19, 2022
•
4 pages
View Details ▾
No structured response data extracted yet.
View the PDF for full details.
▶
City of Palo Alto
December 12, 2022
•
3 pages
• 1 response
•
Score: 0
(+0, 1, 0)
View Details ▾
1 response to findings and recommendations
F1
The Civil Grand Jury commends the City of Mountain View for prioritizing and exhibiting strong, visible support for affordable housing and progress towards Regional Housing Needs Allocation targets. City of Palo Alto Response: NA
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
The City of Palo Alto agrees in part and disagrees in part with this Finding. The City of Palo Alto agrees that the drafting of ballot measure language is an important part of the democratic process, and that local governmental entities that sponsor ballot measures have a responsibility to ensure that ballot measure language is clear, accurate, and useful to voters. The City of Palo Alto disagrees that the current process is "unregulated at the local level." Ballot measure language is drafted by the City's professional staff and approved by the elected City Council, according to requirements o...
▶
City of San Jose
February 08, 2023
•
31 pages
• 4 responses
•
Score: -3
(+0, 0, -3)
View Details ▾
4 responses to findings and recommendations
R1b
Governing entities within Santa Clara County should voluntarily submit their ballot questions to the County Counsel for review prior to submission to the Registrar of Voters, unless and until
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
THE RECOMMENDATION WILL NOT BE <i>IMPLEMENTED</i> In accordance with Section 933.05(b)(4) of the California Penal Code, the City does not believe this recommendation is necessary and it will not be implemented by the City. The City will continue to review and approve ballot measure language as authorized under the California Elections Code. In addition, the City Attorney will continue to review ballot measure questions to determine compliance with California Election law.
Recommendation 1c:
Governing entities within Santa Clara County should, by March 31, 2023, adopt their own resolution or ...
R1c
Governing entities within Santa Clara County should, by March 31, 2023, adopt their own resolution or ordinance to require submission of their ballot questions to the County Counsel for review prior to submission to the Registrar of Voters, unless and until Recommendations 1d and 1e are implemented.
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
THE RECOMMENDATION WILL NOT BE <i>IMPLEMENTED</i> In accordance with Section 933.05(b)(4) of the California Penal Code, the City finds this recommendation unwarranted and it will not be implemented by the City. The City will continue to review and approve ballot measure language as authorized under the California Elections Code. In addition, the City Attorney will continue to review ballot measure questions to determine compliance with California Election law. T-44419 / 1982205
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL December 8, 2022 Subject: SANTA CLARA COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY REPORT: IF YOU ONLY R...
R1d
The County should create an independent, citizen-led oversight commissionlike the recommended Good Governance in Ballots Commission as described in the “Solutions” section of this report. The Commission should be implemented by August 1, 2024. 2There are approximately 50 governing entities within Santa Clara County. The Civil Grand Jury has elected to address theserecommendations to the County, cities, and a select number of special districts and school districts that have historically the most ...
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Recommendation 1d is implemented.
R1e
Governing entities within Santa Clara County should submit their ballot questions for review by the Good Governance in Ballots Commission pursuant to Recommendation 1d.
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
THE RECOMMENDATION WILL NOT BE <i>IMPLEMENTED</i> In accordance with Section 933.05(b)(4) of the California Penal Code, the City finds this recommendation unwarranted and it will not be implemented by the City. The City will continue to review and approve ballot measure language as authorized under the California Elections Code. In addition, the City Attorney will continue to review ballot measure questions to determine compliance with California Election law. In addition, the County of Santa Clara does not have authority under State law over Charter cities. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> This memorandum ...
▶
City of Santa Clara
January 13, 2023
•
86 pages
View Details ▾
No structured response data extracted yet.
View the PDF for full details.
▶
City of Santa Clara
December 08, 2022
•
3 pages
View Details ▾
No structured response data extracted yet.
View the PDF for full details.
▶
City of Saratoga
December 06, 2022
•
3 pages
View Details ▾
No structured response data extracted yet.
View the PDF for full details.
▶
City of Sunnyvale
December 07, 2022
•
4 pages
• 1 response
•
Score: -1
(+0, 0, -1)
View Details ▾
1 response to findings and recommendations
F1
If You Only Read the Ballot, You're Being Duped
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
DISAGREE Anthony Spitaleri Councilmember The City of Sunnyvale disagrees with the assertion that ballot measure questions are unregulated at the local level. Two processes exist that help guard against confusing or misleading ballot questions. First, local agencies hold public hearings before placing measures on the ballot. Resolutions with the proposed ballot question are made public as required by the Brown Act, the public has the opportunity to comment prior to the City adopting that resolution. When the City of Sunnyvale considers a potential ballot measure, the process also typically incl...
▶
City of County of Santa Clara
December 19, 2022
•
4 pages
• 2 responses
View Details ▾
2 responses to findings and recommendations
R1f
The County should, by March 31, 2023, take appropriate action to request that the state legislature consider amending current law to require the County Counsel to review and approve local ballot measure questions before they are voted on. Id.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Recommendation 1 b fulfills this purpose more expeditiously and effectively without creation of a new Brown Act body or jeopardizing election timelines. Recommendation le. Governing entities within Santa Clara County should submit their ballot questions for review by the Good Governance in Ballots Commission pursuant to Recommendation ld. Please see the response to Recommendation ld. Memorandum to Greta S. Hansen, Chief Operating Officer Re: Response to the Octobe
R13
This recommendation has been and is being implemented.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
r 13, 2022 meeting oft he County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors (Item No. 63), the Board adopted the response from the Office of the County Counsel to the Final Civil Grand Jury Reports entitled, If You Only Read the Ballot, You're Being Duped. As directed by the Board of Supervisors and on behalf of the Board President, our office is forwarding to you the enclosed copy oft he responses to the Final Grand Jury Reports. The responses constitute the responses of the Board of Supervisors, consistent with provisions of California Penal Code Section 933(c). lfthere are any questions concerning...
▶
East Side Union High School District
January 27, 2023
•
3 pages
• 2 responses
•
Score: -1
(+0, 0, -1)
View Details ▾
2 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
If You Only Read the Ballot, You're Being Duped
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
The District disagrees with this finding. Preliminarily, the District does not agree with the premise of the report's finding, that the preparation and content of a ballot measure are "unregulated at the local level" and it therefore is "easy for the author of a ballot measure question to write the question in a way that is confusing or misleading to voters." F 408.347.5015 830 N. Capitol Ave San Jose, CA 95133 T 408.347.5000 esuhsd.org East Side Union High School District Board of Trustees Lorena Chavez, President Pattie Cortese, Vice President Bryan Do, Clerk J. Manuel Herrera, Member Van T....
R1d
1f. The County should take appropriate action to request that the state legislature consider amending current law to require the County Counsel to review and approve local ballot measure questions before they are voted on. CONTINUITY REPORT
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Recommendation 1d is implemented.
▶
El Camino Healthcare District
May 16, 2023
•
4 pages
• 2 responses
•
Score: -1
(+0, 0, -1)
View Details ▾
2 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
If You Only Read the Ballot, You're Being Duped
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
CAMIA 2500 Grant Road Mountain View, CA 94040 Phone: 650-940-7300 www.elcaminohealthcaredistrict.org BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Peter C. Fung, MD | Julia E. Miller | Carol A. Somersille, MD | George O. Ting, MD | John L. Zoglin The District disagrees with this finding. As a preliminary matter, the District does not agree with the premise of this finding - i.e., that the preparation of ballot labels/questions<sup>1</sup> are "unregulated at the local level" and it is therefore "easy for the author of a ballot measure question to write the question in a way that is confusing or misleading to voters." T...
R1d
1f. The County should take appropriate action to request that the state legislature consider amending current law to require the County Counsel to review and approve local ballot measure questions before they are voted on. CONTINUITY REPORT
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Recommendation 1d is implemented.
▶
Town of Los Altos Hills
November 17, 2022
•
2 pages
• 2 responses
•
Score: +1
(+1, 0, 0)
View Details ▾
2 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
If You Only Read the Ballot, You're Being Duped
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Town of Los Altos Hills agrees with this Finding. •
R1d
1f. The County should take appropriate action to request that the state legislature consider amending current law to require the County Counsel to review and approve local ballot measure questions before they are voted on. CONTINUITY REPORT
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Recommendation 1d is implemented.
▶
Town of Los Gatos
December 21, 2022
•
3 pages
• 5 responses
•
Score: 0
(+1, 1, -1)
View Details ▾
5 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
The Civil Grand Jury finds that in the current environment, which is unregulated at the local level, it is easy for the author of a ballot measure question to write the question in a way that is confusing or misleading to voters. Response: The Town partially agrees with this Finding. The Town agrees with the portion of the Finding stating that ballot measure questions can be confusing or misleading. The Grand Jury Report itself provides two examples of this Finding. However, with regard to local...
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
the Town partially agrees with Finding 1 and will implement Recommendations 1b and 1c pending confirmation from the County Counsel that the office has capacity to undertake and complete review of Town ballot measure questions within five days of submission by the Town.
R1b
Governing entities within Santa Clara County should voluntarily submit their ballot questions to the County Counsel for review prior to submission to the Registrar of Voters, unless and until
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Recommendation 1b:
Governing entities within Santa Clara County should voluntarily submit their ballot questions to the County Counsel for review prior to submission to the Registrar of Voters, unless and until Recommendation 1d is implemented.
R1c
Governing entities within Santa Clara County should, by March 31, 2023, adopt their own resolution or ordinance to require submission of their ballot questions to the County Counsel for review prior to submission to the Registrar of Voters, unless and until Recommendations 1d and 1e are implemented. Response: The Town will implement Recommendation 1c if the County Counsel confirms that the office 1) has the capacity to review local ballot measure questions; and 2) will be able to complete its re...
Response: Will Implement
Score: +1
The Town will implement
R1d
is implemented. Response: As noted in the Grand Jury report, the California Elections Code does provide an option for recourse if a ballot question falls short of the requirements set forth in State law. If the existing recourses in State law are not working, one solution is to propose amendments to State law. In addition, the Elections Code contains tight timelines and it is challenging to build in review time by a separate agency. The Town will occasionally need to add measures on the ballot q...
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Recommendation 1d is implemented.
R1e
Governing entities within Santa Clara County should submit their ballot questions for review by the Good Governance in Ballots Commission pursuant to Recommendation 1d. Response: The recommendation will not be implemented, because the County of Santa Clara is more familiar with local issues and therefore better equipped to review local ballot measure questions. .
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
The recommendation will not be implemented, because the County of Santa Clara is more familiar with local issues and therefore better equipped to review local ballot measure questions. .
No Responses Found 6
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Cupertino Union School District
School District
Foothill-De Anza Community College District
School District
San Jose Unified School District
School District
Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors
Elected County Office
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
Transit Authority
Santa Clara Valley Water District
Special District