Scotts Valley Fire Protection District Secretary Michelle called the Grand Jury office on the above date to confirm

Santa Cruz County residents are at increased risk of fire danger due to the lack of risk management for wildfire. Specific risks are not formally identified, tracked, assessed for impact, nor is progress reported by fire departments in the County. Therefore, leaders responsible for budgets and accountability are left unprepared to manage risk, impact, or performance. _x AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 of33 Ready? Aim? Fire/ Scotts Valley Fire Protection District Board of Directors f 3. City and County ofifcials have not collaborated with PG&E to identify the location of high risk PG&E electrical equipment, and so are left uninformed as to how to manage their responsibilities or how to instruct residents about potential danger due to proximity to this equipment. X AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE - explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation {required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020

Santa Cruz County would greatly benefit if steps were taken to implement the CAL FIRE, San Mateo -Santa Cruz Unit 2018 recommendation of developing detailed, site specific Community Wildfire Protection Plans for communities throughout the County. JL AGREE --· PARTIALLY DISAGREE - explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020

Response time data for fire departments in Santa Cruz County is challenging to obtain. Santa Cruz Regional 9-1-1 previously reported response time data in their annual reports, but did not do so in the 2018 or 2019 annual reports. lL AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020

Roadside vegetation in rural areas of the County is not being cleared consistently which could potentially increase emergency response time, putting life and property in unnecessary danger. Furthermore, evacuations could be restricted as there is no rule or program that mandates that roads, even critical evacuation routes, be kept cleared meeting defensible space requirements. _x_ AGREE -· _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 of33

There are only approximately 17,000 accounts for the Santa Cruz County opt-in CodeRED emergency system, which implies that a significant portion of TM the County may not receive emergency alert messages, which potentially reduces residents' opportunity to take action in a timely, life-saving manner. X.. AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion -·_ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 of33

Long Range Acoustic Devices (LRADs), have been deployed in other areas of the state and have proven effective tools in alerting residents in urban and rural areas to a wildfire. However, Santa Cruz County has no such devices, increasing the risk to County residents. lL AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion __ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020

High risk communities in the County are left unnecessarily vulnerable due to the lack of easily accessible, published information of refuge/assembly areas and structures. lL AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020

Because the County does not publish a "shelter in place" plan, when a fire expands rapidly, residents cannot make informed decisions about whether to shelter in place or evacuate. x_ AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020

Unlike the City of Santa Cruz, the County does not publish emergency evacuation routes, purportedly to avoid having old or untimely information being followed in an emergency. The County therefore withholds revealing evacuation routes until an emergency is in progress, likely creating unnecessary risk and potential for chaos. AGREE X PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree}: Fire is dynamic and changing. A published evacuation route may not be the feasible or recommended route during a large wildland incident. Response Required by October 1, 2020 f 16. In the Wildl and Urban Interface zone, and in many town centers, traffic choke points exist, and in some instances have roadway obstacles to traffic flow such as overgrown vegetation, concrete medians, curbs, and lane reductions resulting in roads that are inadequate for mass evacuations. _x__ AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE-explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 Ready? Aim? Fire/ Scotts Valley Fire Protection District Board of Directors

Wildfire preparedness informational materials are well done and public education is attempted by fire departments in the County, but fails to sufficiently reach and motivate residents to act. X AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE - explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020

The FireWise institution provides a valuable fire prevention program and, as of March 2020, there were eight FireWise communities registered in the County. Marin County, by contrast, with a similar population, has sixty registered communities, highlighting the need for more FireWise promotion and participation in Santa Cruz County. lL AGREE -· PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree}: Response Required by October 1, 2020

The County Office of Emergency Services and fire agencies in the County encourage residents to be prepared for an emergency, however the passive mechanisms such as web sites used to encourage preparedness are not proving to be sufficient. lL AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree}: Response Required by October 1, 2020

Property owners in the County are responsible for their own vegetation management, yet they are often not sufficiently educated about vegetation management practices, or do not have the capability, financial resources, or desire to create defensible space. x_ AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE - explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020

No single organization in the County is assuming a leadership role in Fire Hazard Mitigation. It is not clear whose responsibility it is to minimize this County wide risk. x_ AGREE -· PARTIALLY DISAGREE - explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation {required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020

The annual report to the County Board of Supervisors and the County Administrative Office by County Fire/CAL FIRE does not provide data or analysis of resources, response times, code enforcement, inspection, or education. This information is necessary to show what gaps exist between current performance and community needs in order for informed budget decisions to be made. Without adequate background information, the Board of Supervisors is unable to hold CAL FIRE accountable for the specific responsibilities specified in their contract. AGREE JL PARTIALLY DISAGREE - explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): The Scotts Valley Fire District is not a party to the Contract between CalFIRE and the County of Santa Cruz. The items specified above in F24 are within the Santa Cruz County Fire Department jurisdiction and not Scotts Valley Fire District. Response Required by October 1, 2020 of33 Ready? Aim? Fire/ Scotts Valley Fire Protection District Board of Directors

Reporting data, statistics, and formats utilized by fire agencies throughout the County are highly inconsistent, uncoordinated, and therefore not readily evaluated and compared. The standard Insurance Services Office (ISO) rating system would be useful to adopt. Response time data are not well described or consistently reported by the jurisdictions, making accurate assessment difficult, especially by other agencies or by the public. X AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ _. DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020

The 2015 County of Santa Cruz Emergency Operations Management plan does not adequately address evacuation, and references data too outdated to be useful, such as a population density map from the 2000 census. X AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 of33

The Grand Jury finds that formally specified baseline and target performance statements, in alignment with the Center for Public Safety Excellence Assessment Process, neither currently exist nor are they reported by fire departments in the County as required by best practice standards. There are no goals set or measures made of progress for review by the Board of Supervisors regarding County Fire/CAL FIRE performance. Other fire districts in the County are similarly remiss in reporting to their governing bodies. Appropriate goals would include progress on response times, vegetation management, and code inspection progress, all of which are necessary to properly quantify the budget and resources required for full-time, volunteer, and prison inmate workforces, in appropriate, affordable proportions. x_ AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE - explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 of33