San Benito County Grand Jury • 2022-2023 • Agency Response

County of San Benito Board of Supervisors*

Published: November 22, 2023 18 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 7 findings

F1
The 13-year closure of the San Justo Reservoir for recreational purposes has frustrated numerous County agencies and supervisors. RESPONSE to F1: The Board agrees with the finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The San Benito County Civil Grand Jury recommends that the County Board of Supervisors should aggressively pursue Federal and State grant money to guarantee payment back to the Bureau of Reclamation needed to rid the reservoir of the invasive zebra mussel infestation. As SBC Congressional representation changes in Washington DC, the Board of Supervisors needs to determine the best course of action required to ensure an effective communication channel. Response to R1: The recommendation has been implemented as the Board aggressively seeks options to eradicate the zebra mussel from San Justo. The County does not own the San Justo Reservoir; therefore, the Board's oversight of what occurs is limited. The Bureau of Reclamation owns the Reservoir, San Benito Water District operates the water, and when it was opened, the County of San Benito was responsible for managing the recreational activity. In December of 1985, the County of San Benito entered a management agreement with the United States of America for the development, administration, operations, and maintenance of recreation at San Justo Reservoir for a term of 50 years, therefore expiring in 2035. In 2035 our agreement to maintain recreation will expire. Since 2008, San Justo Reservoir has been under quarantine, and closure of public access was implemented to prevent the potential spread of the invasive exotic zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha). We are the only region in California with this excessive species and the risk and impact it can have on the State's water system are significant. The County has looked and continues to investigate any available grants and has always sought effective communications with our congressional representatives.
F2
Gang activity and homeless encampments are within the County/City areas along the San Benito River and vigilant law enforcement needs to increase. Board of Supervisors response to 21-22 San Benito County Civil Grand Jury Report RESPONSE to F2: The Board of Supervisors agrees. R 2: It is the Civil Grand Jury's recommendation that the County and City increase their funding to the Hollister Police Department and SBC Sheriff's Department to supply the resources required to address this damaging behavior. RESPONSE to R2: The recommendation will not be implemented at this time. All staffing needs will be considered during the next budget approval process. The Board is committed to working with the Sheriff's department to provide timely and high-quality services to the public. The Board has no oversight over the Hollister Police Department and declines to comment on how the City allocates funds.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The Civil Grand Jury recommends Creating a Violent Crimes Task Force to investigate illegal activity, disrupt gang activity and reduce the volume of illegal drugs and weapons brought into the community. RESPONSE to R-2: This recommendation will not be implemented at this time it is not reasonable in light of budgetary and staffing considerations. However, the Board supports the Sheriff's departmental operational actions to respond and reduce the volume of illegal activity in San Benito County within the allocated budget. The Board supports the Department and additional staff was approved during this year's budget process.
F3
The Civil Grand Jury finds that both the City of Hollister Wastewater Treatment Plant (HWWTP) and Sunnyslope Wastewater Treatment Plant (SWWTP) are NOT running at the design of their full capacity levels, thus neither is cost effective. RESPONSE to F3: The Board neither disagrees nor agrees. The County of San Benito does not have oversight of the City of Hollister Wastewater Treatment Plant (HWWTP), or Sunnyslope Wastewater Treatment Plant (SWWTP), and therefore does not have adequate information to respond to this finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The Civil Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors accelerate a review of the current contract between the City of Hollister/VEOLIA and the Sunnyslope Water District to determine the cost effectiveness of having separate entities duplicating operations at the two facilities. RESPONSE to R3: The recommendation will not be implemented as the Board of Supervisors has no oversight of the City of Hollister Wastewater Treatment Plant or Sunnyslope Water treatment plant.
F4
The SWWTP is operated by County/City/District employees, while the HWWTP is being operated by an independent, 3rd party company (VEOLIA water west operating services) and both operate under different permits from State Regulatory Agencies. RESPONSE to F4: The Board of Supervisors disagrees because County employees do not operate the Sunnyslope Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The Civil Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors accelerate a review of the current contract between the City of Hollister/VEOLIA and the Sunnyslope Water District to decide the cost effectiveness of having separate entities duplicating operations at the two facilities. Board of Supervisors response to 21-22 San Benito County Civil Grand Jury Report RESPONSE to R4: The recommendation will not be implemented as the Board of Supervisors has no oversight of the City of Hollister Wastewater Treatment Plant or Sunnyslope Water treatment plant. SAN BENITO COUNTY JUVENILE HALL VII. F-1: The broken water heater has taken significant time to be repaired or replaced. RESPONSE to F-1: The Board of Supervisors agrees with the Civil Grand Jury's
F5
The Staff of the Juvenile Hall should be commended for their good noticeable attitude and positive energy towards youth and other law enforcement agencies in the community. RESPONSE to F-5: The Board of Supervisors agrees with Civil Grand Jury's finding and values the positive energy that the staff brings towards serving the youth of our community.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The Grand Jury recommends that various staff from other SBC law and justice departments be encouraged to gather informally to share ideas and information about youth in the community. RESPONSE to F-5: The recommendation has been implemented. The department is collaborating with community members, allied agencies, and law enforcement leaders to share resources, discuss ideas, and stay updated on current trends for youth in the community. Some of these meetings occur through Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Commission, Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council (JJCC), Child and Family Team meetings, School Law Partnership meetings, and youth reentry meetings, to name a few. VIII. HOLLISTER ANIMAL SHELTER
F6
Staff lack necessary and desirable training in assessing animals for adoptability (behavioral assessments). RESPONSE to F-6: The Board neither agrees nor disagrees given that the County contracts with the City of Hollister for Animal Control services and has no oversight over operations.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
The Grand Jury recommends the HAS use available online and in-person training to improve staff skills, particularly relating to behavioral and adoptable animal assessments, to utilize a written rubric to support each animal assessment, and to maintain reports in each animal's shelter file until that animal's entire record is purged. RESPONSE to R-6: The recommendation will not be implemented as the County of San Benito contracts with the City of Hollister for Animal Control services and has no oversight over the operation, personnel, or who the City's training practices.
F7
HAS fails to utilize resources for community engagement, to include the reunification of lost pets, by website and outreach through social media. Board of Supervisors response to 21-22 San Benito County Civil Grand Jury Report RESPONSE to F-7: The Board neither agrees nor disagrees given that the County contracts with the City of Hollister for Animal Control services and has no oversight over operations.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
The Grand Jury recommends the Hollister Animal Shelter better engage with the community with regular use of social media, and an updated and accurate website, particularly to assist in the reunification of lost pets. The Grand Jury recommends the regular use of the adoptions trailer, routine visits to dog parks, pet stores and community events to build strong relationships with the community. RESPONSE to R-7: The recommendation will not be implemented as the County of San Benito contracts with the City of Hollister for Animal Control services and has no oversight over the operation. IX. DISPATCH - COMMUNICATIONS REPORT

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.