📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Tulare County Grand Jury
• 2015-2016
2015-2016 Synopses Complaint 15/16 #22
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 6 findings
F1
Page 30
The complainant was on PRCS at the time of the incident.
F2
Page 30
The complainant was classified as a high-risk, chronic drug user and was not drug tested when taken into custody.
F3
Page 30
Reasonable cause was present when complainant was stopped, searched and detained by law enforcement.
F4
Page 30
For individuals on PRCS and homeless, a new policy was implemented by the Tulare County Probation Office requiring GPS monitoring.
F5
Page 30
The Officer used the TASER within the guidelines of the Tulare Police Department policy.
F6
Page 30
The complainant’s allegations against the Tulare Police Department were not substantiated.
Recommendations 2
-
R1Page 30The Tulare County Probation Office complies with the court mandated order for drug testing and the use of drugs.
-
R2Page 30The Tulare County Probation Office not deviate from its drug testing policy. REQUIRED RESPONSES: 1. Tulare County Probation Office