Orange County Grand Jury • 2011-2012

Orange County Vector Control District Orange County Vector Control District "a Study in Little Known Services"

Published: September 21, 2011 10 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 9 findings

F1
The field staff of OCVCD has to deal with older technology in dispatching, reporting and coordinating their activities. This requires extra time dedicated to formalizing reports. Acquiring current technology that links databases would lessen the time spent in the office and allow more time in the field, better serving the community. (R1)
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
OCVCD’s Director of Communication should develop and acquire hardware and software to eliminate the time consuming data acquisition and report writing input that is currently required.
F2
The laboratories of the Agricultural Commissioner, Health Care Agency, and Vector Control have little inter-relationship with respect to their functions and specialized equipment. Little or no communication exists among the labs for sharing of disease information impacting the public. (R2)
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
OCVCD should take the lead in forming a coalition with the Agricultural Commissioners Agency and the Health Care Agency to explore sharing information.
F3
The OCVCD does not exercise all of its abatement rights under the California Health and Safety Code sections 2060-2067. It fails to issue citations and levy fines for violations of the codes against property owners, including banks, who own foreclosed property. Issuing fines could lead to recouping costs of remediating unattended property and lower assessments to all other taxpayers. (R3)
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
OCVCD should start exercising the authority granted to it in the Health and Safety Code and issue citations to individuals, real estate agencies and banks that refuse to maintain swimming pools under their control.
F4
The OCVCD maintains a database of over 3000 abandoned swimming pools throughout Orange County that are basically unattended breeding grounds for mosquitoes. Considerable time is devoted to treating and following up on the condition of these pools. (R3)
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The Board of Trustees should explore downsizing itself to a manageable group of appointed citizens, not elected officials. The Board should consider membership along the lines of the Supervisorial Districts with an appointed representative from each district. Furthermore, the appointees should have some background in biology or related health careers.
F5
The OCVCD has the largest Board of Trustees of any independent special district in Orange County. Thirty-five members represent all the cities and the County Board of Supervisors. Meeting for an hour monthly to discuss and vote on district business presented to them by the staff does not appear to provide adequate oversight. Thirty-five Trustees is an overly large amount for the task of efficient, cost effective governance of this district. (R4)
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
OCVCD should explore teaming with the Webmasters and the County CEO Information Technology, to ensure immediate posting on city websites of vital public health conditions.
F6
The OCVCD’s Communication Department is striving to provide better service to the public and improve its public outreach. Communication and public outreach needs to continue improving. The OCVCD website has no ability to place threat warnings on cities websites. (R5)
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
OCVCD should engage the services of a public relations firm to develop ways to make the name and services more recognizable to the general public.
F7
Currently the overwhelming majority of the citizens of Orange County have little or no knowledge of the OCVCD. In most cases they do not know what the vector control mission entails or how it serves the community. (R6)
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Based on a survey conducted by OCVCD in 2009, the district earned a 94 % approval rating from citizens who had used their services. The 2011-2012 Grand Jury surveyed prospective jury members in August 2011. Only 17% of the respondents surveyed have ever contacted OCVCD. Of those that had used OCVCD, 75% were satisfied with the response. (R6)
No recommendations for this finding
F9
The OCVCD Inspectors are State certified, dedicated and knowledgeable. They perform their services well. The OCVCD is a well-run and well-resourced operation fulfilling its core mission. OCVCD conducts effective and efficient day-to-day operations.
No recommendations for this finding

Additional Recommendations 4

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.

Agency Responses 6

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.