📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 403 findings
F1
Page 39
Custody officer positions were all filled at the time of the tour.
F2
Page 39
During the tour and subsequent interviews, staff were randomly selected to verify that they were in compliance and were wearing their whistles. All staff viewed were in compliance.
F3
Page 39
During the tour and subsequent interviews, staff were wearing their state issued personal alarm devices.
F4
Page 39
Emergency Operations and Alarm Response classes are included in annual in-service training provided to all staff members.
F5
None 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 39 Staff Accountability: Facts:
F6
Page 40
The Identix System is a computerized fingerprint identification system that stores data on employees who have entered and exited the secure perimeter.
F7
Page 40
It is mandatory that all employees use the Identix System when entering and exiting the secure perimeter. This system is located at the two entrances into the secure perimeter, the Front entrance Building and the Vehicle entrance (sally port).
F8
Page 40
The Identix System prints a report of personnel tracking within 30 to 60 minutes after each shift change.
F9
Page 40
Every employee on institutional grounds can be accounted for within 30 to 45 minutes.
F10
Page 40
Measures are immediately taken to locate a staff member if the employee is overdue for departure.
F11
Page 40
It is also mandatory for all employees to sign in and out on all shifts. Findings:
F12
Page 40
Keeping track of staff who enter the secure perimeter is high priority to the institution.
F13
Page 40
Upon entering and exiting the secure perimeter staff were observed using the Identix system.
F14
Page 40
Supervising staff members review the staffing rosters to ensure staff have signed in or out when reporting or leaving their assignments. If there is a discrepancy the supervisor takes immediate measures to account for that employee.
F15
None. Institution Security: Facts:
F16
Page 40
The front entrance and the vehicle sally port are the only access into the secured perimeter.
F17
Page 40
The front entrance and the vehicle sally port are each staffed by a correctional officer 16 hours a day and covered by the Outside Patrol Sergeant during the night shift.
F18
Page 40
The front entrance and the vehicle sally port are each overseen by a 24 hour perimeter tower staffed by armed correctional officers. The correctional officers in the towers control the gates electronically.
F19
Page 40
The Entrance Officer: Ensures each employee uses the Identix System, examines each staff member’s identification cards to ensure authenticity, searches items being brought in or out of the institution, processes official visitors to the institution and directs outside companies to various areas of the Institution.
F20
Page 40
The Vehicle Sally Port Officer: Positively identifies the individual(s) that are operating and occupying the vehicle and ensures they sign in and out. The officer also ensures employees use the Identix System when entering or exiting the secure perimeter through the vehicle sally port. The officer ensures inmate identification through the verification of 40 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report authorized inmate gate passes. Inmates are also identified and the officer reviews and ensures there is appropriate documentation and inmate gate passes are authorized and complete.
F21
Page 41
Inmates are also processed through the vehicle sally port by vehicle or controlled escort.
F22
Page 41
Every vehicle that is processed through the vehicle sally port is thoroughly searched inside and outside. Finding:
F23
Page 41
There are comprehensive procedures in place to ensure a high level of security at the institution.
F24
None. Institutional Services: Education: Facts:
F25
Page 41
The Education Department at MCSP is a fully accredited school through the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
F26
Page 41
MCSP offers a variety of vocational training programs and academic courses for inmates.
F27
Page 41
Both vocational and academic programs are competency based permitting each inmate to progress according to his individual ability.
F28
Page 41
These classes provide individual and group instruction intended to improve literacy and vocational skills.
F29
Page 41
Several vocational and academic classes were visited by members of the Grand Jury. Findings:
F30
Page 41
Inmates are given the opportunity to learn useful skills that could increase their employability once they parole.
F31
Page 41
The inmates were observed working productively at vocational tasks and academic studies.
F32
Page 41
The Teachers and Vocational Instructors are doing an effective job of providing meaningful work and studies.
F33
None 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 41 Information Distribution: Facts:
F34
Page 42
Information is provided on a closed circuit video system by the Media Center supervised by a Television Specialist. The information consists of up coming changes in policies, which programs are operating normally or have been restricted, changes affecting inmate visiting, rule reminders and current events in the facilities, etc.
F35
Page 42
The Warden or the Administrative Assistant approves the information prior to its being displayed on this closed circuit video system.
F36
Page 42
Inmates with personal televisions and all dayroom televisions can receive this information on screen. Finding:
F37
Page 42
Up-to-date information shared throughout the institution is a valuable means to control rumors and reduce tension among inmates. This enhances safety for staff and inmates.
F38
None Medical and Mental Health Services: Facts:
F39
Page 42
There are inmates housed at MCSP that have been identified as being developmentally disabled, with mental illnesses and inmates with less severe physical disabilities that do not have an impact on their housing needs. These inmates are tracked and their mental and medical needs are met.
F40
Page 42
A new Mental Health Services building is in the process of being built to accommodate the needs of the inmates assigned to the Mental Health Delivery System.
F41
Page 42
MCSP is staffed with various medical personnel to serve the needs of the inmate population. These employees include medical doctors, nurses, medical technical assistants, dentists, psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed clinical social workers, pharmacists, dietitian, laboratory technicians and radiologists, etc. There are specialty clinics that include services for optometry, podiatry, physical therapy and others.
F42
Page 42
Each facility has a medical and dental clinic. Inmates are charged a $5.00 co-payment for non-emergency medical and dental services.
F43
Page 42
The Main infirmary has an emergency room, which is equipped and maintained at all times to receive inmates with urgent medical issues. Other inmate medical emergencies or severe health conditions are transported to outside hospitals or other prisons that can accommodate their medical needs. The Main Infirmary is in the process of being renovated for expansion. Finding:
F44
Page 42
MCSP has extensive medical and mental health services for the treatment of inmates. The services offered are free of cost to the inmates (except non-emergency medical and 42 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report dental services).
F45
None Response Required: None. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 43 Preston Youth Correctional Facility Introduction: Penal Code Section 919(b) mandates that the Grand Jury annually review all prisons and jails within the County. Background: Juveniles committed by juvenile and criminal courts to the California Youth Authority (CYA) are sent to Preston Youth Correctional Facility (PYCF) for treatment and training. The CYA is the largest youth corrections agency in the nation, housing some 5,700 young men and women in eleven institutions and four camps throughout the state, with approximately 4,200 more on parole. PYCF was one of the first two state youthful offender facilities (Reform schools) mandated by the state in 1890 to remove juvenile offenders from adult prisons. The historic landmark "Preston Castle" opened June 13, 1894; many more structures and facilities have been built over the years. PYCF has historically been a role model for innovations in juvenile corrections nationwide. Fourteen living units provide housing, five with rooms which are either single bunked or double bunked, and nine open dormitories. Three of the dormitories have been closed due to declining population. Six specialized treatment programs are offered. Method of Evaluation: Members of the Grand Jury conducted interviews and toured the Preston Youth Correctional Facility. Persons interviewed: Superintendent Assistant Superintendent Chief of Security Training Officer Senior Youth Correctional Counselors Youth Correctional Counselors Youth Correctional Officers Principal of Education Kitchen Staff Stationary Engineer Wards Inmates 44 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report Documents Examined: Welfare and Institution Codes Internet Sites: California Department of the Youth Authority: http://www.cya.ca.gov California Senate: http://www.sen.ca.gov Fresno Bee: http://www.fresnobee.com Demographics: Facts:
F46
Page 45
PYCF houses male offenders, most between 17 and 19 years of age. The CYA can house offenders up to their 25th birthday.
F47
Page 45
The offenders are wards of the state or are inmates, juveniles tried as adults.
F48
Page 45
At the time of the Grand Jury’s first visit in November 2002 to PYCF the population was 560. The population was 511 on a subsequent visit in April 2003.
F49
Page 45
PYCF has closed three living units in the last 12 months with the most recent occurring on April 1, 2003.
F50
Page 45
Section 912 of the California Welfare and Institution Code (W & I Code), amended in 1997, states the counties of California will pay a sliding scale percentage of the per capita cost to house a ward in the CYA ranging from 50% to 100% depending on the seriousness of the crime. For many years prior to this the cost to the counties for a ward committed to the CYA was around $300 per year.
F51
Page 45
The ward per capita cost for 2002/2003 is $49,200. The cost to counties for a ward committed to the CYA can be $24,600 to $49,200 per year. Findings:
F52
Page 45
The CYA population is declining due to legislative mandates requiring the state to charge counties for CYA commitments.
F53
Page 45
Counties are keeping juvenile offenders in juvenile halls or county camps. As an example, Fresno County Probation Department, Fresno County had 219 commitments to the CYA at a cost of $109,676 in 1995/1996 fiscal year. The cost increased to $3.8 million in fiscal year 1999/2000 for 110 new commitments to the CYA.
F54
Page 45
Several CYA Institutions will be closed in the near future. At this time it is undetermined if Preston will be closed.
F55
Page 45
PYCF has provided community service and economic stability to Ione and Amador County for over one hundred years. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 45
F56
None Treatment Programs: Facts:
F57
Page 46
There is one living unit that offers a formalized program for wards and inmates with substance abuse problems or the potential for substance abuse problems.
F58
Page 46
There is an Intensive Treatment Program and a Specialized Counseling Program to assist wards with severe emotional problems.
F59
Page 46
Wards in these treatment programs are housed in single bunked rooms. Findings:
F60
Page 46
The wards were living in a safe, secure and clean environment.
F61
Page 46
Staff appeared interested and cared about the ward’s progress in their treatment goals.
F62
Page 46
Wards interviewed were able to discuss program goals and their growth in these specialized programs.
F63
Page 46
The administrators, supervisors, counselors, custody staff, and other personnel have a good working relationship with each other and were very informative. The facility is managed in a professional and yet personable manner, with safety and security of staff and the wards the main concern.
F64
Page 46
The programs observed afford a ward the realistic opportunity to gain the personal skills and, the basic vocational skills to make a life change and become a productive citizen if he so desires.
F65
None Educational and Vocational Programs: Facts:
F66
Page 46
The school at PYCF provides 67% academic classes and 33% vocational training. The academic classes concentrate on wards earning a high school diploma, GED or passing the California High School Proficiency Examination (CHSPE).
F67
Page 46
There is also a correspondence college program for those wards with a high school diploma or GED.
F68
The teacher to student ratio is one to seventeen. 46 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report
F69
Page 47
Vocational training includes auto shop, computer graphics, graphic arts, culinary arts, restaurant service, general shop (orientation), janitorial and masonry.
F70
Page 47
The Ponderosa Fire Training Center, adjacent to the main institution, teaches physical fitness, teamwork, and fire science and safety to wards eligible for placement in Youth Conservation Camps. Ponderosa also has a community service work crew that does work for non-profit and public agencies. Findings:
F71
Page 47
The school at PYCF is very much like any school in California.
F72
Page 47
It is hard to compare year to year results from tests such as the STAR (Standardized Testing and Reporting) test and the High School Exit Examinations because the school does not have the same students each year.
F73
None Main Kitchen: Facts:
F74
Page 47
The main kitchen at PYCF was built in 1898 and is one of the oldest in the CYA and is a historical landmark.
F75
Page 47
All wards at PYCF are served two hot meals and one sack lunch per day, for a total of over 1500 meals per day served.
F76
Page 47
Wards work in the kitchen doing meal preparation and cleanup and are supervised by kitchen staff and a Youth Correctional Officer. Findings:
F77
Page 47
The kitchen was clean and well maintained.
F78
Page 47
The floors are tile and often wet from food preparation, cleaning and mopping. A special soap is used on the floor, which eats the grease to prevent build up.
F79
Page 47
Where the floors were wet, no “caution wet floor” signs were displayed.
F80
Page 47
Place “caution wet floor” signs around any floors that are wet. Response Required: The Amador County Grand Jury requires a response to this report per California Penal Code Section 933.05. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 47 Amador County Unified School District 48 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report Amador County Unified School District Introduction: The 2002-2003 Grand Jury elected to review and evaluate the Amador County School District (ACUSD) pursuant to Penal Code 933.5. Previous Grand Jury Reports have noted deficiencies in the Transportation Department and the vertical communication between the various departments and the Administration, including the School Board. These problems led to the District being sued by the Amador County District Attorney (DA), which resulted in the suspension of bus service in the District for a month. The operation of unsafe buses could result in serious injuries to students and the general public. Such injuries would expose the District to legal liability, which could result in financial ruin for the District. Prior Grand Jury Reports have also noted that the District had failed to address safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey done by their insurance carrier. These items if left unrepaired could easily lead to serious injury to students and others using school facilities. Compensating such injuries would strain the District’s already tight financial position. Further, a bond issue was passed to make improvements to the District infrastructure. The use of these funds in part to correct the safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey could make the District not only safer but also fiscally more responsible by taking care of maintenance problems when they are small. Maintenance procedures in the Transportation Department and throughout the District were examined to determine why these safety issues remained unresolved Method of Evaluation: Members of the 2002-2003 Grand Jury conducted interviews, reviewed documents, and visited sites. For a complete list, please see Appendix 1 and 2. ACUSD Board of Trustees: Background: On January 22, 2002, a parent called the California Highway Patrol (CHP), reporting a School District bus parked along a route with its rear axle lying beside it. On January 13, 2003 the Amador County Unified School District shut down its entire bus service for regular school students after meeting with CHP officials and the County District Attorney. The CHP had documented a four-year history of continuing violations of state bus safety requirements; they said it was the worst record they had ever seen anywhere in California. The bus terminal received four failing ratings during these years; the Highway Patrol had noted over 800 violations in the transportation operation in that period. The CHP had earlier taken their concerns and their documentation to the District Attorney, who initiated legal action to force the school district to correct the problems. The bus fleet remained out of service for a month and a half, while numerous repairs were made. Many parents attended Board meetings and two town hall meetings to express how concerned they were that their children would be safe on the busses. The District Attorney decided to work with the District in fashioning a Consent Decree, which laid out a course of corrective actions over a period of 14 months. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 49
F81
Page 40
Keeping track of staff who enter the secure perimeter is high priority to the institution.
F82
Page 40
Upon entering and exiting the secure perimeter staff were observed using the Identix system.
F83
Page 40
Supervising staff members review the staffing rosters to ensure staff have signed in or out when reporting or leaving their assignments. If there is a discrepancy the supervisor takes immediate measures to account for that employee.
F84
None. Institution Security: Facts:
F85
Page 40
The front entrance and the vehicle sally port are the only access into the secured perimeter.
F86
Page 40
The front entrance and the vehicle sally port are each staffed by a correctional officer 16 hours a day and covered by the Outside Patrol Sergeant during the night shift.
F87
Page 40
The front entrance and the vehicle sally port are each overseen by a 24 hour perimeter tower staffed by armed correctional officers. The correctional officers in the towers control the gates electronically.
F88
Page 40
The Entrance Officer: Ensures each employee uses the Identix System, examines each staff member’s identification cards to ensure authenticity, searches items being brought in or out of the institution, processes official visitors to the institution and directs outside companies to various areas of the Institution.
F89
Page 40
The Vehicle Sally Port Officer: Positively identifies the individual(s) that are operating and occupying the vehicle and ensures they sign in and out. The officer also ensures employees use the Identix System when entering or exiting the secure perimeter through the vehicle sally port. The officer ensures inmate identification through the verification of 40 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report authorized inmate gate passes. Inmates are also identified and the officer reviews and ensures there is appropriate documentation and inmate gate passes are authorized and complete.
F90
Page 41
Inmates are also processed through the vehicle sally port by vehicle or controlled escort.
F91
Page 41
Every vehicle that is processed through the vehicle sally port is thoroughly searched inside and outside. Finding:
F92
Page 41
There are comprehensive procedures in place to ensure a high level of security at the institution.
F93
None. Institutional Services: Education: Facts:
F94
Page 41
The Education Department at MCSP is a fully accredited school through the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
F95
Page 41
MCSP offers a variety of vocational training programs and academic courses for inmates.
F96
Page 41
Both vocational and academic programs are competency based permitting each inmate to progress according to his individual ability.
F97
Page 41
These classes provide individual and group instruction intended to improve literacy and vocational skills.
F98
Page 41
Several vocational and academic classes were visited by members of the Grand Jury. Findings:
F99
Page 41
Inmates are given the opportunity to learn useful skills that could increase their employability once they parole.
F100
Page 41
The inmates were observed working productively at vocational tasks and academic studies.
F101
Page 41
The Teachers and Vocational Instructors are doing an effective job of providing meaningful work and studies.
F102
None 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 41 Information Distribution: Facts:
F103
Page 42
Information is provided on a closed circuit video system by the Media Center supervised by a Television Specialist. The information consists of up coming changes in policies, which programs are operating normally or have been restricted, changes affecting inmate visiting, rule reminders and current events in the facilities, etc.
F104
Page 42
The Warden or the Administrative Assistant approves the information prior to its being displayed on this closed circuit video system.
F105
Page 42
Inmates with personal televisions and all dayroom televisions can receive this information on screen. Finding:
F106
Page 42
Up-to-date information shared throughout the institution is a valuable means to control rumors and reduce tension among inmates. This enhances safety for staff and inmates.
F107
None Medical and Mental Health Services: Facts:
F108
Page 42
There are inmates housed at MCSP that have been identified as being developmentally disabled, with mental illnesses and inmates with less severe physical disabilities that do not have an impact on their housing needs. These inmates are tracked and their mental and medical needs are met.
F109
Page 42
A new Mental Health Services building is in the process of being built to accommodate the needs of the inmates assigned to the Mental Health Delivery System.
F110
Page 42
MCSP is staffed with various medical personnel to serve the needs of the inmate population. These employees include medical doctors, nurses, medical technical assistants, dentists, psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed clinical social workers, pharmacists, dietitian, laboratory technicians and radiologists, etc. There are specialty clinics that include services for optometry, podiatry, physical therapy and others.
F111
Page 42
Each facility has a medical and dental clinic. Inmates are charged a $5.00 co-payment for non-emergency medical and dental services.
F112
Page 42
The Main infirmary has an emergency room, which is equipped and maintained at all times to receive inmates with urgent medical issues. Other inmate medical emergencies or severe health conditions are transported to outside hospitals or other prisons that can accommodate their medical needs. The Main Infirmary is in the process of being renovated for expansion. Finding:
F113
Page 42
MCSP has extensive medical and mental health services for the treatment of inmates. The services offered are free of cost to the inmates (except non-emergency medical and 42 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report dental services).
F114
None Response Required: None. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 43 Preston Youth Correctional Facility Introduction: Penal Code Section 919(b) mandates that the Grand Jury annually review all prisons and jails within the County. Background: Juveniles committed by juvenile and criminal courts to the California Youth Authority (CYA) are sent to Preston Youth Correctional Facility (PYCF) for treatment and training. The CYA is the largest youth corrections agency in the nation, housing some 5,700 young men and women in eleven institutions and four camps throughout the state, with approximately 4,200 more on parole. PYCF was one of the first two state youthful offender facilities (Reform schools) mandated by the state in 1890 to remove juvenile offenders from adult prisons. The historic landmark "Preston Castle" opened June 13, 1894; many more structures and facilities have been built over the years. PYCF has historically been a role model for innovations in juvenile corrections nationwide. Fourteen living units provide housing, five with rooms which are either single bunked or double bunked, and nine open dormitories. Three of the dormitories have been closed due to declining population. Six specialized treatment programs are offered. Method of Evaluation: Members of the Grand Jury conducted interviews and toured the Preston Youth Correctional Facility. Persons interviewed: Superintendent Assistant Superintendent Chief of Security Training Officer Senior Youth Correctional Counselors Youth Correctional Counselors Youth Correctional Officers Principal of Education Kitchen Staff Stationary Engineer Wards Inmates 44 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report Documents Examined: Welfare and Institution Codes Internet Sites: California Department of the Youth Authority: http://www.cya.ca.gov California Senate: http://www.sen.ca.gov Fresno Bee: http://www.fresnobee.com Demographics: Facts:
F115
Page 45
PYCF houses male offenders, most between 17 and 19 years of age. The CYA can house offenders up to their 25th birthday.
F116
Page 45
The offenders are wards of the state or are inmates, juveniles tried as adults.
F117
Page 45
At the time of the Grand Jury’s first visit in November 2002 to PYCF the population was 560. The population was 511 on a subsequent visit in April 2003.
F118
Page 45
PYCF has closed three living units in the last 12 months with the most recent occurring on April 1, 2003.
F119
Page 45
Section 912 of the California Welfare and Institution Code (W & I Code), amended in 1997, states the counties of California will pay a sliding scale percentage of the per capita cost to house a ward in the CYA ranging from 50% to 100% depending on the seriousness of the crime. For many years prior to this the cost to the counties for a ward committed to the CYA was around $300 per year.
F120
Page 45
The ward per capita cost for 2002/2003 is $49,200. The cost to counties for a ward committed to the CYA can be $24,600 to $49,200 per year. Findings:
F121
Page 45
The CYA population is declining due to legislative mandates requiring the state to charge counties for CYA commitments.
F122
Page 45
Counties are keeping juvenile offenders in juvenile halls or county camps. As an example, Fresno County Probation Department, Fresno County had 219 commitments to the CYA at a cost of $109,676 in 1995/1996 fiscal year. The cost increased to $3.8 million in fiscal year 1999/2000 for 110 new commitments to the CYA.
F123
Page 45
Several CYA Institutions will be closed in the near future. At this time it is undetermined if Preston will be closed.
F124
Page 45
PYCF has provided community service and economic stability to Ione and Amador County for over one hundred years. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 45
F125
None Treatment Programs: Facts:
F126
Page 46
There is one living unit that offers a formalized program for wards and inmates with substance abuse problems or the potential for substance abuse problems.
F127
Page 46
There is an Intensive Treatment Program and a Specialized Counseling Program to assist wards with severe emotional problems.
F128
Page 46
Wards in these treatment programs are housed in single bunked rooms. Findings:
F129
Page 46
The wards were living in a safe, secure and clean environment.
F130
Page 46
Staff appeared interested and cared about the ward’s progress in their treatment goals.
F131
Page 46
Wards interviewed were able to discuss program goals and their growth in these specialized programs.
F132
Page 46
The administrators, supervisors, counselors, custody staff, and other personnel have a good working relationship with each other and were very informative. The facility is managed in a professional and yet personable manner, with safety and security of staff and the wards the main concern.
F133
Page 46
The programs observed afford a ward the realistic opportunity to gain the personal skills and, the basic vocational skills to make a life change and become a productive citizen if he so desires.
F134
None Educational and Vocational Programs: Facts:
F135
Page 46
The school at PYCF provides 67% academic classes and 33% vocational training. The academic classes concentrate on wards earning a high school diploma, GED or passing the California High School Proficiency Examination (CHSPE).
F136
Page 46
There is also a correspondence college program for those wards with a high school diploma or GED.
F137
The teacher to student ratio is one to seventeen. 46 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report
F138
Page 47
Vocational training includes auto shop, computer graphics, graphic arts, culinary arts, restaurant service, general shop (orientation), janitorial and masonry.
F139
Page 47
The Ponderosa Fire Training Center, adjacent to the main institution, teaches physical fitness, teamwork, and fire science and safety to wards eligible for placement in Youth Conservation Camps. Ponderosa also has a community service work crew that does work for non-profit and public agencies. Findings:
F140
Page 47
The school at PYCF is very much like any school in California.
F141
Page 47
It is hard to compare year to year results from tests such as the STAR (Standardized Testing and Reporting) test and the High School Exit Examinations because the school does not have the same students each year.
F142
None Main Kitchen: Facts:
F143
Page 47
The main kitchen at PYCF was built in 1898 and is one of the oldest in the CYA and is a historical landmark.
F144
Page 47
All wards at PYCF are served two hot meals and one sack lunch per day, for a total of over 1500 meals per day served.
F145
Page 47
Wards work in the kitchen doing meal preparation and cleanup and are supervised by kitchen staff and a Youth Correctional Officer. Findings:
F146
Page 47
The kitchen was clean and well maintained.
F147
Page 47
The floors are tile and often wet from food preparation, cleaning and mopping. A special soap is used on the floor, which eats the grease to prevent build up.
F148
Page 47
Where the floors were wet, no “caution wet floor” signs were displayed.
F149
Page 47
Place “caution wet floor” signs around any floors that are wet. Response Required: The Amador County Grand Jury requires a response to this report per California Penal Code Section 933.05. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 47 Amador County Unified School District 48 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report Amador County Unified School District Introduction: The 2002-2003 Grand Jury elected to review and evaluate the Amador County School District (ACUSD) pursuant to Penal Code 933.5. Previous Grand Jury Reports have noted deficiencies in the Transportation Department and the vertical communication between the various departments and the Administration, including the School Board. These problems led to the District being sued by the Amador County District Attorney (DA), which resulted in the suspension of bus service in the District for a month. The operation of unsafe buses could result in serious injuries to students and the general public. Such injuries would expose the District to legal liability, which could result in financial ruin for the District. Prior Grand Jury Reports have also noted that the District had failed to address safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey done by their insurance carrier. These items if left unrepaired could easily lead to serious injury to students and others using school facilities. Compensating such injuries would strain the District’s already tight financial position. Further, a bond issue was passed to make improvements to the District infrastructure. The use of these funds in part to correct the safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey could make the District not only safer but also fiscally more responsible by taking care of maintenance problems when they are small. Maintenance procedures in the Transportation Department and throughout the District were examined to determine why these safety issues remained unresolved Method of Evaluation: Members of the 2002-2003 Grand Jury conducted interviews, reviewed documents, and visited sites. For a complete list, please see Appendix 1 and 2. ACUSD Board of Trustees: Background: On January 22, 2002, a parent called the California Highway Patrol (CHP), reporting a School District bus parked along a route with its rear axle lying beside it. On January 13, 2003 the Amador County Unified School District shut down its entire bus service for regular school students after meeting with CHP officials and the County District Attorney. The CHP had documented a four-year history of continuing violations of state bus safety requirements; they said it was the worst record they had ever seen anywhere in California. The bus terminal received four failing ratings during these years; the Highway Patrol had noted over 800 violations in the transportation operation in that period. The CHP had earlier taken their concerns and their documentation to the District Attorney, who initiated legal action to force the school district to correct the problems. The bus fleet remained out of service for a month and a half, while numerous repairs were made. Many parents attended Board meetings and two town hall meetings to express how concerned they were that their children would be safe on the busses. The District Attorney decided to work with the District in fashioning a Consent Decree, which laid out a course of corrective actions over a period of 14 months. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 49
F150
Page 41
There are comprehensive procedures in place to ensure a high level of security at the institution.
F151
None. Institutional Services: Education: Facts:
F152
Page 41
The Education Department at MCSP is a fully accredited school through the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
F153
Page 41
MCSP offers a variety of vocational training programs and academic courses for inmates.
F154
Page 41
Both vocational and academic programs are competency based permitting each inmate to progress according to his individual ability.
F155
Page 41
These classes provide individual and group instruction intended to improve literacy and vocational skills.
F156
Page 41
Several vocational and academic classes were visited by members of the Grand Jury. Findings:
F157
Page 41
Inmates are given the opportunity to learn useful skills that could increase their employability once they parole.
F158
Page 41
The inmates were observed working productively at vocational tasks and academic studies.
F159
Page 41
The Teachers and Vocational Instructors are doing an effective job of providing meaningful work and studies.
F160
None 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 41 Information Distribution: Facts:
F161
Page 42
Information is provided on a closed circuit video system by the Media Center supervised by a Television Specialist. The information consists of up coming changes in policies, which programs are operating normally or have been restricted, changes affecting inmate visiting, rule reminders and current events in the facilities, etc.
F162
Page 42
The Warden or the Administrative Assistant approves the information prior to its being displayed on this closed circuit video system.
F163
Page 42
Inmates with personal televisions and all dayroom televisions can receive this information on screen. Finding:
F164
Page 42
Up-to-date information shared throughout the institution is a valuable means to control rumors and reduce tension among inmates. This enhances safety for staff and inmates.
F165
None Medical and Mental Health Services: Facts:
F166
Page 42
There are inmates housed at MCSP that have been identified as being developmentally disabled, with mental illnesses and inmates with less severe physical disabilities that do not have an impact on their housing needs. These inmates are tracked and their mental and medical needs are met.
F167
Page 42
A new Mental Health Services building is in the process of being built to accommodate the needs of the inmates assigned to the Mental Health Delivery System.
F168
Page 42
MCSP is staffed with various medical personnel to serve the needs of the inmate population. These employees include medical doctors, nurses, medical technical assistants, dentists, psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed clinical social workers, pharmacists, dietitian, laboratory technicians and radiologists, etc. There are specialty clinics that include services for optometry, podiatry, physical therapy and others.
F169
Page 42
Each facility has a medical and dental clinic. Inmates are charged a $5.00 co-payment for non-emergency medical and dental services.
F170
Page 42
The Main infirmary has an emergency room, which is equipped and maintained at all times to receive inmates with urgent medical issues. Other inmate medical emergencies or severe health conditions are transported to outside hospitals or other prisons that can accommodate their medical needs. The Main Infirmary is in the process of being renovated for expansion. Finding:
F171
Page 42
MCSP has extensive medical and mental health services for the treatment of inmates. The services offered are free of cost to the inmates (except non-emergency medical and 42 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report dental services).
F172
None Response Required: None. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 43 Preston Youth Correctional Facility Introduction: Penal Code Section 919(b) mandates that the Grand Jury annually review all prisons and jails within the County. Background: Juveniles committed by juvenile and criminal courts to the California Youth Authority (CYA) are sent to Preston Youth Correctional Facility (PYCF) for treatment and training. The CYA is the largest youth corrections agency in the nation, housing some 5,700 young men and women in eleven institutions and four camps throughout the state, with approximately 4,200 more on parole. PYCF was one of the first two state youthful offender facilities (Reform schools) mandated by the state in 1890 to remove juvenile offenders from adult prisons. The historic landmark "Preston Castle" opened June 13, 1894; many more structures and facilities have been built over the years. PYCF has historically been a role model for innovations in juvenile corrections nationwide. Fourteen living units provide housing, five with rooms which are either single bunked or double bunked, and nine open dormitories. Three of the dormitories have been closed due to declining population. Six specialized treatment programs are offered. Method of Evaluation: Members of the Grand Jury conducted interviews and toured the Preston Youth Correctional Facility. Persons interviewed: Superintendent Assistant Superintendent Chief of Security Training Officer Senior Youth Correctional Counselors Youth Correctional Counselors Youth Correctional Officers Principal of Education Kitchen Staff Stationary Engineer Wards Inmates 44 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report Documents Examined: Welfare and Institution Codes Internet Sites: California Department of the Youth Authority: http://www.cya.ca.gov California Senate: http://www.sen.ca.gov Fresno Bee: http://www.fresnobee.com Demographics: Facts:
F173
Page 45
PYCF houses male offenders, most between 17 and 19 years of age. The CYA can house offenders up to their 25th birthday.
F174
Page 45
The offenders are wards of the state or are inmates, juveniles tried as adults.
F175
Page 45
At the time of the Grand Jury’s first visit in November 2002 to PYCF the population was 560. The population was 511 on a subsequent visit in April 2003.
F176
Page 45
PYCF has closed three living units in the last 12 months with the most recent occurring on April 1, 2003.
F177
Page 45
Section 912 of the California Welfare and Institution Code (W & I Code), amended in 1997, states the counties of California will pay a sliding scale percentage of the per capita cost to house a ward in the CYA ranging from 50% to 100% depending on the seriousness of the crime. For many years prior to this the cost to the counties for a ward committed to the CYA was around $300 per year.
F178
Page 45
The ward per capita cost for 2002/2003 is $49,200. The cost to counties for a ward committed to the CYA can be $24,600 to $49,200 per year. Findings:
F179
Page 45
The CYA population is declining due to legislative mandates requiring the state to charge counties for CYA commitments.
F180
Page 45
Counties are keeping juvenile offenders in juvenile halls or county camps. As an example, Fresno County Probation Department, Fresno County had 219 commitments to the CYA at a cost of $109,676 in 1995/1996 fiscal year. The cost increased to $3.8 million in fiscal year 1999/2000 for 110 new commitments to the CYA.
F181
Page 45
Several CYA Institutions will be closed in the near future. At this time it is undetermined if Preston will be closed.
F182
Page 45
PYCF has provided community service and economic stability to Ione and Amador County for over one hundred years. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 45
F183
None Treatment Programs: Facts:
F184
Page 46
There is one living unit that offers a formalized program for wards and inmates with substance abuse problems or the potential for substance abuse problems.
F185
Page 46
There is an Intensive Treatment Program and a Specialized Counseling Program to assist wards with severe emotional problems.
F186
Page 46
Wards in these treatment programs are housed in single bunked rooms. Findings:
F187
Page 46
The wards were living in a safe, secure and clean environment.
F188
Page 46
Staff appeared interested and cared about the ward’s progress in their treatment goals.
F189
Page 46
Wards interviewed were able to discuss program goals and their growth in these specialized programs.
F190
Page 46
The administrators, supervisors, counselors, custody staff, and other personnel have a good working relationship with each other and were very informative. The facility is managed in a professional and yet personable manner, with safety and security of staff and the wards the main concern.
F191
Page 46
The programs observed afford a ward the realistic opportunity to gain the personal skills and, the basic vocational skills to make a life change and become a productive citizen if he so desires.
F192
None Educational and Vocational Programs: Facts:
F193
Page 46
The school at PYCF provides 67% academic classes and 33% vocational training. The academic classes concentrate on wards earning a high school diploma, GED or passing the California High School Proficiency Examination (CHSPE).
F194
Page 46
There is also a correspondence college program for those wards with a high school diploma or GED.
F195
The teacher to student ratio is one to seventeen. 46 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report
F196
Page 47
Vocational training includes auto shop, computer graphics, graphic arts, culinary arts, restaurant service, general shop (orientation), janitorial and masonry.
F197
Page 47
The Ponderosa Fire Training Center, adjacent to the main institution, teaches physical fitness, teamwork, and fire science and safety to wards eligible for placement in Youth Conservation Camps. Ponderosa also has a community service work crew that does work for non-profit and public agencies. Findings:
F198
Page 47
The school at PYCF is very much like any school in California.
F199
Page 47
It is hard to compare year to year results from tests such as the STAR (Standardized Testing and Reporting) test and the High School Exit Examinations because the school does not have the same students each year.
F200
None Main Kitchen: Facts:
F201
Page 47
The main kitchen at PYCF was built in 1898 and is one of the oldest in the CYA and is a historical landmark.
F202
Page 47
All wards at PYCF are served two hot meals and one sack lunch per day, for a total of over 1500 meals per day served.
F203
Page 47
Wards work in the kitchen doing meal preparation and cleanup and are supervised by kitchen staff and a Youth Correctional Officer. Findings:
F204
Page 47
The kitchen was clean and well maintained.
F205
Page 47
The floors are tile and often wet from food preparation, cleaning and mopping. A special soap is used on the floor, which eats the grease to prevent build up.
F206
Page 47
Where the floors were wet, no “caution wet floor” signs were displayed.
F207
Page 47
Place “caution wet floor” signs around any floors that are wet. Response Required: The Amador County Grand Jury requires a response to this report per California Penal Code Section 933.05. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 47 Amador County Unified School District 48 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report Amador County Unified School District Introduction: The 2002-2003 Grand Jury elected to review and evaluate the Amador County School District (ACUSD) pursuant to Penal Code 933.5. Previous Grand Jury Reports have noted deficiencies in the Transportation Department and the vertical communication between the various departments and the Administration, including the School Board. These problems led to the District being sued by the Amador County District Attorney (DA), which resulted in the suspension of bus service in the District for a month. The operation of unsafe buses could result in serious injuries to students and the general public. Such injuries would expose the District to legal liability, which could result in financial ruin for the District. Prior Grand Jury Reports have also noted that the District had failed to address safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey done by their insurance carrier. These items if left unrepaired could easily lead to serious injury to students and others using school facilities. Compensating such injuries would strain the District’s already tight financial position. Further, a bond issue was passed to make improvements to the District infrastructure. The use of these funds in part to correct the safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey could make the District not only safer but also fiscally more responsible by taking care of maintenance problems when they are small. Maintenance procedures in the Transportation Department and throughout the District were examined to determine why these safety issues remained unresolved Method of Evaluation: Members of the 2002-2003 Grand Jury conducted interviews, reviewed documents, and visited sites. For a complete list, please see Appendix 1 and 2. ACUSD Board of Trustees: Background: On January 22, 2002, a parent called the California Highway Patrol (CHP), reporting a School District bus parked along a route with its rear axle lying beside it. On January 13, 2003 the Amador County Unified School District shut down its entire bus service for regular school students after meeting with CHP officials and the County District Attorney. The CHP had documented a four-year history of continuing violations of state bus safety requirements; they said it was the worst record they had ever seen anywhere in California. The bus terminal received four failing ratings during these years; the Highway Patrol had noted over 800 violations in the transportation operation in that period. The CHP had earlier taken their concerns and their documentation to the District Attorney, who initiated legal action to force the school district to correct the problems. The bus fleet remained out of service for a month and a half, while numerous repairs were made. Many parents attended Board meetings and two town hall meetings to express how concerned they were that their children would be safe on the busses. The District Attorney decided to work with the District in fashioning a Consent Decree, which laid out a course of corrective actions over a period of 14 months. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 49
F208
Page 41
Inmates are given the opportunity to learn useful skills that could increase their employability once they parole.
F209
Page 41
The inmates were observed working productively at vocational tasks and academic studies.
F210
Page 41
The Teachers and Vocational Instructors are doing an effective job of providing meaningful work and studies.
F211
None 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 41 Information Distribution: Facts:
F212
Page 42
Information is provided on a closed circuit video system by the Media Center supervised by a Television Specialist. The information consists of up coming changes in policies, which programs are operating normally or have been restricted, changes affecting inmate visiting, rule reminders and current events in the facilities, etc.
F213
Page 42
The Warden or the Administrative Assistant approves the information prior to its being displayed on this closed circuit video system.
F214
Page 42
Inmates with personal televisions and all dayroom televisions can receive this information on screen. Finding:
F215
Page 42
Up-to-date information shared throughout the institution is a valuable means to control rumors and reduce tension among inmates. This enhances safety for staff and inmates.
F216
None Medical and Mental Health Services: Facts:
F217
Page 42
There are inmates housed at MCSP that have been identified as being developmentally disabled, with mental illnesses and inmates with less severe physical disabilities that do not have an impact on their housing needs. These inmates are tracked and their mental and medical needs are met.
F218
Page 42
A new Mental Health Services building is in the process of being built to accommodate the needs of the inmates assigned to the Mental Health Delivery System.
F219
Page 42
MCSP is staffed with various medical personnel to serve the needs of the inmate population. These employees include medical doctors, nurses, medical technical assistants, dentists, psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed clinical social workers, pharmacists, dietitian, laboratory technicians and radiologists, etc. There are specialty clinics that include services for optometry, podiatry, physical therapy and others.
F220
Page 42
Each facility has a medical and dental clinic. Inmates are charged a $5.00 co-payment for non-emergency medical and dental services.
F221
Page 42
The Main infirmary has an emergency room, which is equipped and maintained at all times to receive inmates with urgent medical issues. Other inmate medical emergencies or severe health conditions are transported to outside hospitals or other prisons that can accommodate their medical needs. The Main Infirmary is in the process of being renovated for expansion. Finding:
F222
Page 42
MCSP has extensive medical and mental health services for the treatment of inmates. The services offered are free of cost to the inmates (except non-emergency medical and 42 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report dental services).
F223
None Response Required: None. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 43 Preston Youth Correctional Facility Introduction: Penal Code Section 919(b) mandates that the Grand Jury annually review all prisons and jails within the County. Background: Juveniles committed by juvenile and criminal courts to the California Youth Authority (CYA) are sent to Preston Youth Correctional Facility (PYCF) for treatment and training. The CYA is the largest youth corrections agency in the nation, housing some 5,700 young men and women in eleven institutions and four camps throughout the state, with approximately 4,200 more on parole. PYCF was one of the first two state youthful offender facilities (Reform schools) mandated by the state in 1890 to remove juvenile offenders from adult prisons. The historic landmark "Preston Castle" opened June 13, 1894; many more structures and facilities have been built over the years. PYCF has historically been a role model for innovations in juvenile corrections nationwide. Fourteen living units provide housing, five with rooms which are either single bunked or double bunked, and nine open dormitories. Three of the dormitories have been closed due to declining population. Six specialized treatment programs are offered. Method of Evaluation: Members of the Grand Jury conducted interviews and toured the Preston Youth Correctional Facility. Persons interviewed: Superintendent Assistant Superintendent Chief of Security Training Officer Senior Youth Correctional Counselors Youth Correctional Counselors Youth Correctional Officers Principal of Education Kitchen Staff Stationary Engineer Wards Inmates 44 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report Documents Examined: Welfare and Institution Codes Internet Sites: California Department of the Youth Authority: http://www.cya.ca.gov California Senate: http://www.sen.ca.gov Fresno Bee: http://www.fresnobee.com Demographics: Facts:
F224
Page 45
PYCF houses male offenders, most between 17 and 19 years of age. The CYA can house offenders up to their 25th birthday.
F225
Page 45
The offenders are wards of the state or are inmates, juveniles tried as adults.
F226
Page 45
At the time of the Grand Jury’s first visit in November 2002 to PYCF the population was 560. The population was 511 on a subsequent visit in April 2003.
F227
Page 45
PYCF has closed three living units in the last 12 months with the most recent occurring on April 1, 2003.
F228
Page 45
Section 912 of the California Welfare and Institution Code (W & I Code), amended in 1997, states the counties of California will pay a sliding scale percentage of the per capita cost to house a ward in the CYA ranging from 50% to 100% depending on the seriousness of the crime. For many years prior to this the cost to the counties for a ward committed to the CYA was around $300 per year.
F229
Page 45
The ward per capita cost for 2002/2003 is $49,200. The cost to counties for a ward committed to the CYA can be $24,600 to $49,200 per year. Findings:
F230
Page 45
The CYA population is declining due to legislative mandates requiring the state to charge counties for CYA commitments.
F231
Page 45
Counties are keeping juvenile offenders in juvenile halls or county camps. As an example, Fresno County Probation Department, Fresno County had 219 commitments to the CYA at a cost of $109,676 in 1995/1996 fiscal year. The cost increased to $3.8 million in fiscal year 1999/2000 for 110 new commitments to the CYA.
F232
Page 45
Several CYA Institutions will be closed in the near future. At this time it is undetermined if Preston will be closed.
F233
Page 45
PYCF has provided community service and economic stability to Ione and Amador County for over one hundred years. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 45
F234
None Treatment Programs: Facts:
F235
Page 46
There is one living unit that offers a formalized program for wards and inmates with substance abuse problems or the potential for substance abuse problems.
F236
Page 46
There is an Intensive Treatment Program and a Specialized Counseling Program to assist wards with severe emotional problems.
F237
Page 46
Wards in these treatment programs are housed in single bunked rooms. Findings:
F238
Page 46
The wards were living in a safe, secure and clean environment.
F239
Page 46
Staff appeared interested and cared about the ward’s progress in their treatment goals.
F240
Page 46
Wards interviewed were able to discuss program goals and their growth in these specialized programs.
F241
Page 46
The administrators, supervisors, counselors, custody staff, and other personnel have a good working relationship with each other and were very informative. The facility is managed in a professional and yet personable manner, with safety and security of staff and the wards the main concern.
F242
Page 46
The programs observed afford a ward the realistic opportunity to gain the personal skills and, the basic vocational skills to make a life change and become a productive citizen if he so desires.
F243
None Educational and Vocational Programs: Facts:
F244
Page 46
The school at PYCF provides 67% academic classes and 33% vocational training. The academic classes concentrate on wards earning a high school diploma, GED or passing the California High School Proficiency Examination (CHSPE).
F245
Page 46
There is also a correspondence college program for those wards with a high school diploma or GED.
F246
The teacher to student ratio is one to seventeen. 46 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report
F247
Page 47
Vocational training includes auto shop, computer graphics, graphic arts, culinary arts, restaurant service, general shop (orientation), janitorial and masonry.
F248
Page 47
The Ponderosa Fire Training Center, adjacent to the main institution, teaches physical fitness, teamwork, and fire science and safety to wards eligible for placement in Youth Conservation Camps. Ponderosa also has a community service work crew that does work for non-profit and public agencies. Findings:
F249
Page 47
The school at PYCF is very much like any school in California.
F250
Page 47
It is hard to compare year to year results from tests such as the STAR (Standardized Testing and Reporting) test and the High School Exit Examinations because the school does not have the same students each year.
F251
None Main Kitchen: Facts:
F252
Page 47
The main kitchen at PYCF was built in 1898 and is one of the oldest in the CYA and is a historical landmark.
F253
Page 47
All wards at PYCF are served two hot meals and one sack lunch per day, for a total of over 1500 meals per day served.
F254
Page 47
Wards work in the kitchen doing meal preparation and cleanup and are supervised by kitchen staff and a Youth Correctional Officer. Findings:
F255
Page 47
The kitchen was clean and well maintained.
F256
Page 47
The floors are tile and often wet from food preparation, cleaning and mopping. A special soap is used on the floor, which eats the grease to prevent build up.
F257
Page 47
Where the floors were wet, no “caution wet floor” signs were displayed.
F258
Page 47
Place “caution wet floor” signs around any floors that are wet. Response Required: The Amador County Grand Jury requires a response to this report per California Penal Code Section 933.05. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 47 Amador County Unified School District 48 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report Amador County Unified School District Introduction: The 2002-2003 Grand Jury elected to review and evaluate the Amador County School District (ACUSD) pursuant to Penal Code 933.5. Previous Grand Jury Reports have noted deficiencies in the Transportation Department and the vertical communication between the various departments and the Administration, including the School Board. These problems led to the District being sued by the Amador County District Attorney (DA), which resulted in the suspension of bus service in the District for a month. The operation of unsafe buses could result in serious injuries to students and the general public. Such injuries would expose the District to legal liability, which could result in financial ruin for the District. Prior Grand Jury Reports have also noted that the District had failed to address safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey done by their insurance carrier. These items if left unrepaired could easily lead to serious injury to students and others using school facilities. Compensating such injuries would strain the District’s already tight financial position. Further, a bond issue was passed to make improvements to the District infrastructure. The use of these funds in part to correct the safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey could make the District not only safer but also fiscally more responsible by taking care of maintenance problems when they are small. Maintenance procedures in the Transportation Department and throughout the District were examined to determine why these safety issues remained unresolved Method of Evaluation: Members of the 2002-2003 Grand Jury conducted interviews, reviewed documents, and visited sites. For a complete list, please see Appendix 1 and 2. ACUSD Board of Trustees: Background: On January 22, 2002, a parent called the California Highway Patrol (CHP), reporting a School District bus parked along a route with its rear axle lying beside it. On January 13, 2003 the Amador County Unified School District shut down its entire bus service for regular school students after meeting with CHP officials and the County District Attorney. The CHP had documented a four-year history of continuing violations of state bus safety requirements; they said it was the worst record they had ever seen anywhere in California. The bus terminal received four failing ratings during these years; the Highway Patrol had noted over 800 violations in the transportation operation in that period. The CHP had earlier taken their concerns and their documentation to the District Attorney, who initiated legal action to force the school district to correct the problems. The bus fleet remained out of service for a month and a half, while numerous repairs were made. Many parents attended Board meetings and two town hall meetings to express how concerned they were that their children would be safe on the busses. The District Attorney decided to work with the District in fashioning a Consent Decree, which laid out a course of corrective actions over a period of 14 months. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 49
F259
Page 42
Up-to-date information shared throughout the institution is a valuable means to control rumors and reduce tension among inmates. This enhances safety for staff and inmates.
F260
None Medical and Mental Health Services: Facts:
F261
Page 42
There are inmates housed at MCSP that have been identified as being developmentally disabled, with mental illnesses and inmates with less severe physical disabilities that do not have an impact on their housing needs. These inmates are tracked and their mental and medical needs are met.
F262
Page 42
A new Mental Health Services building is in the process of being built to accommodate the needs of the inmates assigned to the Mental Health Delivery System.
F263
Page 42
MCSP is staffed with various medical personnel to serve the needs of the inmate population. These employees include medical doctors, nurses, medical technical assistants, dentists, psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed clinical social workers, pharmacists, dietitian, laboratory technicians and radiologists, etc. There are specialty clinics that include services for optometry, podiatry, physical therapy and others.
F264
Page 42
Each facility has a medical and dental clinic. Inmates are charged a $5.00 co-payment for non-emergency medical and dental services.
F265
Page 42
The Main infirmary has an emergency room, which is equipped and maintained at all times to receive inmates with urgent medical issues. Other inmate medical emergencies or severe health conditions are transported to outside hospitals or other prisons that can accommodate their medical needs. The Main Infirmary is in the process of being renovated for expansion. Finding:
F266
Page 42
MCSP has extensive medical and mental health services for the treatment of inmates. The services offered are free of cost to the inmates (except non-emergency medical and 42 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report dental services).
F267
None Response Required: None. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 43 Preston Youth Correctional Facility Introduction: Penal Code Section 919(b) mandates that the Grand Jury annually review all prisons and jails within the County. Background: Juveniles committed by juvenile and criminal courts to the California Youth Authority (CYA) are sent to Preston Youth Correctional Facility (PYCF) for treatment and training. The CYA is the largest youth corrections agency in the nation, housing some 5,700 young men and women in eleven institutions and four camps throughout the state, with approximately 4,200 more on parole. PYCF was one of the first two state youthful offender facilities (Reform schools) mandated by the state in 1890 to remove juvenile offenders from adult prisons. The historic landmark "Preston Castle" opened June 13, 1894; many more structures and facilities have been built over the years. PYCF has historically been a role model for innovations in juvenile corrections nationwide. Fourteen living units provide housing, five with rooms which are either single bunked or double bunked, and nine open dormitories. Three of the dormitories have been closed due to declining population. Six specialized treatment programs are offered. Method of Evaluation: Members of the Grand Jury conducted interviews and toured the Preston Youth Correctional Facility. Persons interviewed: Superintendent Assistant Superintendent Chief of Security Training Officer Senior Youth Correctional Counselors Youth Correctional Counselors Youth Correctional Officers Principal of Education Kitchen Staff Stationary Engineer Wards Inmates 44 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report Documents Examined: Welfare and Institution Codes Internet Sites: California Department of the Youth Authority: http://www.cya.ca.gov California Senate: http://www.sen.ca.gov Fresno Bee: http://www.fresnobee.com Demographics: Facts:
F268
Page 45
PYCF houses male offenders, most between 17 and 19 years of age. The CYA can house offenders up to their 25th birthday.
F269
Page 45
The offenders are wards of the state or are inmates, juveniles tried as adults.
F270
Page 45
At the time of the Grand Jury’s first visit in November 2002 to PYCF the population was 560. The population was 511 on a subsequent visit in April 2003.
F271
Page 45
PYCF has closed three living units in the last 12 months with the most recent occurring on April 1, 2003.
F272
Page 45
Section 912 of the California Welfare and Institution Code (W & I Code), amended in 1997, states the counties of California will pay a sliding scale percentage of the per capita cost to house a ward in the CYA ranging from 50% to 100% depending on the seriousness of the crime. For many years prior to this the cost to the counties for a ward committed to the CYA was around $300 per year.
F273
Page 45
The ward per capita cost for 2002/2003 is $49,200. The cost to counties for a ward committed to the CYA can be $24,600 to $49,200 per year. Findings:
F274
Page 45
The CYA population is declining due to legislative mandates requiring the state to charge counties for CYA commitments.
F275
Page 45
Counties are keeping juvenile offenders in juvenile halls or county camps. As an example, Fresno County Probation Department, Fresno County had 219 commitments to the CYA at a cost of $109,676 in 1995/1996 fiscal year. The cost increased to $3.8 million in fiscal year 1999/2000 for 110 new commitments to the CYA.
F276
Page 45
Several CYA Institutions will be closed in the near future. At this time it is undetermined if Preston will be closed.
F277
Page 45
PYCF has provided community service and economic stability to Ione and Amador County for over one hundred years. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 45
F278
None Treatment Programs: Facts:
F279
Page 46
There is one living unit that offers a formalized program for wards and inmates with substance abuse problems or the potential for substance abuse problems.
F280
Page 46
There is an Intensive Treatment Program and a Specialized Counseling Program to assist wards with severe emotional problems.
F281
Page 46
Wards in these treatment programs are housed in single bunked rooms. Findings:
F282
Page 46
The wards were living in a safe, secure and clean environment.
F283
Page 46
Staff appeared interested and cared about the ward’s progress in their treatment goals.
F284
Page 46
Wards interviewed were able to discuss program goals and their growth in these specialized programs.
F285
Page 46
The administrators, supervisors, counselors, custody staff, and other personnel have a good working relationship with each other and were very informative. The facility is managed in a professional and yet personable manner, with safety and security of staff and the wards the main concern.
F286
Page 46
The programs observed afford a ward the realistic opportunity to gain the personal skills and, the basic vocational skills to make a life change and become a productive citizen if he so desires.
F287
None Educational and Vocational Programs: Facts:
F288
Page 46
The school at PYCF provides 67% academic classes and 33% vocational training. The academic classes concentrate on wards earning a high school diploma, GED or passing the California High School Proficiency Examination (CHSPE).
F289
Page 46
There is also a correspondence college program for those wards with a high school diploma or GED.
F290
The teacher to student ratio is one to seventeen. 46 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report
F291
Page 47
Vocational training includes auto shop, computer graphics, graphic arts, culinary arts, restaurant service, general shop (orientation), janitorial and masonry.
F292
Page 47
The Ponderosa Fire Training Center, adjacent to the main institution, teaches physical fitness, teamwork, and fire science and safety to wards eligible for placement in Youth Conservation Camps. Ponderosa also has a community service work crew that does work for non-profit and public agencies. Findings:
F293
Page 47
The school at PYCF is very much like any school in California.
F294
Page 47
It is hard to compare year to year results from tests such as the STAR (Standardized Testing and Reporting) test and the High School Exit Examinations because the school does not have the same students each year.
F295
None Main Kitchen: Facts:
F296
Page 47
The main kitchen at PYCF was built in 1898 and is one of the oldest in the CYA and is a historical landmark.
F297
Page 47
All wards at PYCF are served two hot meals and one sack lunch per day, for a total of over 1500 meals per day served.
F298
Page 47
Wards work in the kitchen doing meal preparation and cleanup and are supervised by kitchen staff and a Youth Correctional Officer. Findings:
F299
Page 47
The kitchen was clean and well maintained.
F300
Page 47
The floors are tile and often wet from food preparation, cleaning and mopping. A special soap is used on the floor, which eats the grease to prevent build up.
F301
Page 47
Where the floors were wet, no “caution wet floor” signs were displayed.
F302
Page 47
Place “caution wet floor” signs around any floors that are wet. Response Required: The Amador County Grand Jury requires a response to this report per California Penal Code Section 933.05. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 47 Amador County Unified School District 48 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report Amador County Unified School District Introduction: The 2002-2003 Grand Jury elected to review and evaluate the Amador County School District (ACUSD) pursuant to Penal Code 933.5. Previous Grand Jury Reports have noted deficiencies in the Transportation Department and the vertical communication between the various departments and the Administration, including the School Board. These problems led to the District being sued by the Amador County District Attorney (DA), which resulted in the suspension of bus service in the District for a month. The operation of unsafe buses could result in serious injuries to students and the general public. Such injuries would expose the District to legal liability, which could result in financial ruin for the District. Prior Grand Jury Reports have also noted that the District had failed to address safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey done by their insurance carrier. These items if left unrepaired could easily lead to serious injury to students and others using school facilities. Compensating such injuries would strain the District’s already tight financial position. Further, a bond issue was passed to make improvements to the District infrastructure. The use of these funds in part to correct the safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey could make the District not only safer but also fiscally more responsible by taking care of maintenance problems when they are small. Maintenance procedures in the Transportation Department and throughout the District were examined to determine why these safety issues remained unresolved Method of Evaluation: Members of the 2002-2003 Grand Jury conducted interviews, reviewed documents, and visited sites. For a complete list, please see Appendix 1 and 2. ACUSD Board of Trustees: Background: On January 22, 2002, a parent called the California Highway Patrol (CHP), reporting a School District bus parked along a route with its rear axle lying beside it. On January 13, 2003 the Amador County Unified School District shut down its entire bus service for regular school students after meeting with CHP officials and the County District Attorney. The CHP had documented a four-year history of continuing violations of state bus safety requirements; they said it was the worst record they had ever seen anywhere in California. The bus terminal received four failing ratings during these years; the Highway Patrol had noted over 800 violations in the transportation operation in that period. The CHP had earlier taken their concerns and their documentation to the District Attorney, who initiated legal action to force the school district to correct the problems. The bus fleet remained out of service for a month and a half, while numerous repairs were made. Many parents attended Board meetings and two town hall meetings to express how concerned they were that their children would be safe on the busses. The District Attorney decided to work with the District in fashioning a Consent Decree, which laid out a course of corrective actions over a period of 14 months. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 49
F303
Page 42
MCSP has extensive medical and mental health services for the treatment of inmates. The services offered are free of cost to the inmates (except non-emergency medical and 42 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report dental services).
F304
None Response Required: None. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 43 Preston Youth Correctional Facility Introduction: Penal Code Section 919(b) mandates that the Grand Jury annually review all prisons and jails within the County. Background: Juveniles committed by juvenile and criminal courts to the California Youth Authority (CYA) are sent to Preston Youth Correctional Facility (PYCF) for treatment and training. The CYA is the largest youth corrections agency in the nation, housing some 5,700 young men and women in eleven institutions and four camps throughout the state, with approximately 4,200 more on parole. PYCF was one of the first two state youthful offender facilities (Reform schools) mandated by the state in 1890 to remove juvenile offenders from adult prisons. The historic landmark "Preston Castle" opened June 13, 1894; many more structures and facilities have been built over the years. PYCF has historically been a role model for innovations in juvenile corrections nationwide. Fourteen living units provide housing, five with rooms which are either single bunked or double bunked, and nine open dormitories. Three of the dormitories have been closed due to declining population. Six specialized treatment programs are offered. Method of Evaluation: Members of the Grand Jury conducted interviews and toured the Preston Youth Correctional Facility. Persons interviewed: Superintendent Assistant Superintendent Chief of Security Training Officer Senior Youth Correctional Counselors Youth Correctional Counselors Youth Correctional Officers Principal of Education Kitchen Staff Stationary Engineer Wards Inmates 44 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report Documents Examined: Welfare and Institution Codes Internet Sites: California Department of the Youth Authority: http://www.cya.ca.gov California Senate: http://www.sen.ca.gov Fresno Bee: http://www.fresnobee.com Demographics: Facts:
F305
Page 45
PYCF houses male offenders, most between 17 and 19 years of age. The CYA can house offenders up to their 25th birthday.
F306
Page 45
The offenders are wards of the state or are inmates, juveniles tried as adults.
F307
Page 45
At the time of the Grand Jury’s first visit in November 2002 to PYCF the population was 560. The population was 511 on a subsequent visit in April 2003.
F308
Page 45
PYCF has closed three living units in the last 12 months with the most recent occurring on April 1, 2003.
F309
Page 45
Section 912 of the California Welfare and Institution Code (W & I Code), amended in 1997, states the counties of California will pay a sliding scale percentage of the per capita cost to house a ward in the CYA ranging from 50% to 100% depending on the seriousness of the crime. For many years prior to this the cost to the counties for a ward committed to the CYA was around $300 per year.
F310
Page 45
The ward per capita cost for 2002/2003 is $49,200. The cost to counties for a ward committed to the CYA can be $24,600 to $49,200 per year. Findings:
F311
Page 45
The CYA population is declining due to legislative mandates requiring the state to charge counties for CYA commitments.
F312
Page 45
Counties are keeping juvenile offenders in juvenile halls or county camps. As an example, Fresno County Probation Department, Fresno County had 219 commitments to the CYA at a cost of $109,676 in 1995/1996 fiscal year. The cost increased to $3.8 million in fiscal year 1999/2000 for 110 new commitments to the CYA.
F313
Page 45
Several CYA Institutions will be closed in the near future. At this time it is undetermined if Preston will be closed.
F314
Page 45
PYCF has provided community service and economic stability to Ione and Amador County for over one hundred years. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 45
F315
None Treatment Programs: Facts:
F316
Page 46
There is one living unit that offers a formalized program for wards and inmates with substance abuse problems or the potential for substance abuse problems.
F317
Page 46
There is an Intensive Treatment Program and a Specialized Counseling Program to assist wards with severe emotional problems.
F318
Page 46
Wards in these treatment programs are housed in single bunked rooms. Findings:
F319
Page 46
The wards were living in a safe, secure and clean environment.
F320
Page 46
Staff appeared interested and cared about the ward’s progress in their treatment goals.
F321
Page 46
Wards interviewed were able to discuss program goals and their growth in these specialized programs.
F322
Page 46
The administrators, supervisors, counselors, custody staff, and other personnel have a good working relationship with each other and were very informative. The facility is managed in a professional and yet personable manner, with safety and security of staff and the wards the main concern.
F323
Page 46
The programs observed afford a ward the realistic opportunity to gain the personal skills and, the basic vocational skills to make a life change and become a productive citizen if he so desires.
F324
None Educational and Vocational Programs: Facts:
F325
Page 46
The school at PYCF provides 67% academic classes and 33% vocational training. The academic classes concentrate on wards earning a high school diploma, GED or passing the California High School Proficiency Examination (CHSPE).
F326
Page 46
There is also a correspondence college program for those wards with a high school diploma or GED.
F327
The teacher to student ratio is one to seventeen. 46 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report
F328
Page 47
Vocational training includes auto shop, computer graphics, graphic arts, culinary arts, restaurant service, general shop (orientation), janitorial and masonry.
F329
Page 47
The Ponderosa Fire Training Center, adjacent to the main institution, teaches physical fitness, teamwork, and fire science and safety to wards eligible for placement in Youth Conservation Camps. Ponderosa also has a community service work crew that does work for non-profit and public agencies. Findings:
F330
Page 47
The school at PYCF is very much like any school in California.
F331
Page 47
It is hard to compare year to year results from tests such as the STAR (Standardized Testing and Reporting) test and the High School Exit Examinations because the school does not have the same students each year.
F332
None Main Kitchen: Facts:
F333
Page 47
The main kitchen at PYCF was built in 1898 and is one of the oldest in the CYA and is a historical landmark.
F334
Page 47
All wards at PYCF are served two hot meals and one sack lunch per day, for a total of over 1500 meals per day served.
F335
Page 47
Wards work in the kitchen doing meal preparation and cleanup and are supervised by kitchen staff and a Youth Correctional Officer. Findings:
F336
Page 47
The kitchen was clean and well maintained.
F337
Page 47
The floors are tile and often wet from food preparation, cleaning and mopping. A special soap is used on the floor, which eats the grease to prevent build up.
F338
Page 47
Where the floors were wet, no “caution wet floor” signs were displayed.
F339
Page 47
Place “caution wet floor” signs around any floors that are wet. Response Required: The Amador County Grand Jury requires a response to this report per California Penal Code Section 933.05. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 47 Amador County Unified School District 48 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report Amador County Unified School District Introduction: The 2002-2003 Grand Jury elected to review and evaluate the Amador County School District (ACUSD) pursuant to Penal Code 933.5. Previous Grand Jury Reports have noted deficiencies in the Transportation Department and the vertical communication between the various departments and the Administration, including the School Board. These problems led to the District being sued by the Amador County District Attorney (DA), which resulted in the suspension of bus service in the District for a month. The operation of unsafe buses could result in serious injuries to students and the general public. Such injuries would expose the District to legal liability, which could result in financial ruin for the District. Prior Grand Jury Reports have also noted that the District had failed to address safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey done by their insurance carrier. These items if left unrepaired could easily lead to serious injury to students and others using school facilities. Compensating such injuries would strain the District’s already tight financial position. Further, a bond issue was passed to make improvements to the District infrastructure. The use of these funds in part to correct the safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey could make the District not only safer but also fiscally more responsible by taking care of maintenance problems when they are small. Maintenance procedures in the Transportation Department and throughout the District were examined to determine why these safety issues remained unresolved Method of Evaluation: Members of the 2002-2003 Grand Jury conducted interviews, reviewed documents, and visited sites. For a complete list, please see Appendix 1 and 2. ACUSD Board of Trustees: Background: On January 22, 2002, a parent called the California Highway Patrol (CHP), reporting a School District bus parked along a route with its rear axle lying beside it. On January 13, 2003 the Amador County Unified School District shut down its entire bus service for regular school students after meeting with CHP officials and the County District Attorney. The CHP had documented a four-year history of continuing violations of state bus safety requirements; they said it was the worst record they had ever seen anywhere in California. The bus terminal received four failing ratings during these years; the Highway Patrol had noted over 800 violations in the transportation operation in that period. The CHP had earlier taken their concerns and their documentation to the District Attorney, who initiated legal action to force the school district to correct the problems. The bus fleet remained out of service for a month and a half, while numerous repairs were made. Many parents attended Board meetings and two town hall meetings to express how concerned they were that their children would be safe on the busses. The District Attorney decided to work with the District in fashioning a Consent Decree, which laid out a course of corrective actions over a period of 14 months. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 49
F340
Page 45
The CYA population is declining due to legislative mandates requiring the state to charge counties for CYA commitments.
F341
Page 45
Counties are keeping juvenile offenders in juvenile halls or county camps. As an example, Fresno County Probation Department, Fresno County had 219 commitments to the CYA at a cost of $109,676 in 1995/1996 fiscal year. The cost increased to $3.8 million in fiscal year 1999/2000 for 110 new commitments to the CYA.
F342
Page 45
Several CYA Institutions will be closed in the near future. At this time it is undetermined if Preston will be closed.
F343
Page 45
PYCF has provided community service and economic stability to Ione and Amador County for over one hundred years. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 45
F344
None Treatment Programs: Facts:
F345
Page 46
There is one living unit that offers a formalized program for wards and inmates with substance abuse problems or the potential for substance abuse problems.
F346
Page 46
There is an Intensive Treatment Program and a Specialized Counseling Program to assist wards with severe emotional problems.
F347
Page 46
Wards in these treatment programs are housed in single bunked rooms. Findings:
F348
Page 46
The wards were living in a safe, secure and clean environment.
F349
Page 46
Staff appeared interested and cared about the ward’s progress in their treatment goals.
F350
Page 46
Wards interviewed were able to discuss program goals and their growth in these specialized programs.
F351
Page 46
The administrators, supervisors, counselors, custody staff, and other personnel have a good working relationship with each other and were very informative. The facility is managed in a professional and yet personable manner, with safety and security of staff and the wards the main concern.
F352
Page 46
The programs observed afford a ward the realistic opportunity to gain the personal skills and, the basic vocational skills to make a life change and become a productive citizen if he so desires.
F353
None Educational and Vocational Programs: Facts:
F354
Page 46
The school at PYCF provides 67% academic classes and 33% vocational training. The academic classes concentrate on wards earning a high school diploma, GED or passing the California High School Proficiency Examination (CHSPE).
F355
Page 46
There is also a correspondence college program for those wards with a high school diploma or GED.
F356
The teacher to student ratio is one to seventeen. 46 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report
F357
Page 47
Vocational training includes auto shop, computer graphics, graphic arts, culinary arts, restaurant service, general shop (orientation), janitorial and masonry.
F358
Page 47
The Ponderosa Fire Training Center, adjacent to the main institution, teaches physical fitness, teamwork, and fire science and safety to wards eligible for placement in Youth Conservation Camps. Ponderosa also has a community service work crew that does work for non-profit and public agencies. Findings:
F359
Page 47
The school at PYCF is very much like any school in California.
F360
Page 47
It is hard to compare year to year results from tests such as the STAR (Standardized Testing and Reporting) test and the High School Exit Examinations because the school does not have the same students each year.
F361
None Main Kitchen: Facts:
F362
Page 47
The main kitchen at PYCF was built in 1898 and is one of the oldest in the CYA and is a historical landmark.
F363
Page 47
All wards at PYCF are served two hot meals and one sack lunch per day, for a total of over 1500 meals per day served.
F364
Page 47
Wards work in the kitchen doing meal preparation and cleanup and are supervised by kitchen staff and a Youth Correctional Officer. Findings:
F365
Page 47
The kitchen was clean and well maintained.
F366
Page 47
The floors are tile and often wet from food preparation, cleaning and mopping. A special soap is used on the floor, which eats the grease to prevent build up.
F367
Page 47
Where the floors were wet, no “caution wet floor” signs were displayed.
F368
Page 47
Place “caution wet floor” signs around any floors that are wet. Response Required: The Amador County Grand Jury requires a response to this report per California Penal Code Section 933.05. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 47 Amador County Unified School District 48 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report Amador County Unified School District Introduction: The 2002-2003 Grand Jury elected to review and evaluate the Amador County School District (ACUSD) pursuant to Penal Code 933.5. Previous Grand Jury Reports have noted deficiencies in the Transportation Department and the vertical communication between the various departments and the Administration, including the School Board. These problems led to the District being sued by the Amador County District Attorney (DA), which resulted in the suspension of bus service in the District for a month. The operation of unsafe buses could result in serious injuries to students and the general public. Such injuries would expose the District to legal liability, which could result in financial ruin for the District. Prior Grand Jury Reports have also noted that the District had failed to address safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey done by their insurance carrier. These items if left unrepaired could easily lead to serious injury to students and others using school facilities. Compensating such injuries would strain the District’s already tight financial position. Further, a bond issue was passed to make improvements to the District infrastructure. The use of these funds in part to correct the safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey could make the District not only safer but also fiscally more responsible by taking care of maintenance problems when they are small. Maintenance procedures in the Transportation Department and throughout the District were examined to determine why these safety issues remained unresolved Method of Evaluation: Members of the 2002-2003 Grand Jury conducted interviews, reviewed documents, and visited sites. For a complete list, please see Appendix 1 and 2. ACUSD Board of Trustees: Background: On January 22, 2002, a parent called the California Highway Patrol (CHP), reporting a School District bus parked along a route with its rear axle lying beside it. On January 13, 2003 the Amador County Unified School District shut down its entire bus service for regular school students after meeting with CHP officials and the County District Attorney. The CHP had documented a four-year history of continuing violations of state bus safety requirements; they said it was the worst record they had ever seen anywhere in California. The bus terminal received four failing ratings during these years; the Highway Patrol had noted over 800 violations in the transportation operation in that period. The CHP had earlier taken their concerns and their documentation to the District Attorney, who initiated legal action to force the school district to correct the problems. The bus fleet remained out of service for a month and a half, while numerous repairs were made. Many parents attended Board meetings and two town hall meetings to express how concerned they were that their children would be safe on the busses. The District Attorney decided to work with the District in fashioning a Consent Decree, which laid out a course of corrective actions over a period of 14 months. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 49
F369
Page 46
The wards were living in a safe, secure and clean environment.
F370
Page 46
Staff appeared interested and cared about the ward’s progress in their treatment goals.
F371
Page 46
Wards interviewed were able to discuss program goals and their growth in these specialized programs.
F372
Page 46
The administrators, supervisors, counselors, custody staff, and other personnel have a good working relationship with each other and were very informative. The facility is managed in a professional and yet personable manner, with safety and security of staff and the wards the main concern.
F373
Page 46
The programs observed afford a ward the realistic opportunity to gain the personal skills and, the basic vocational skills to make a life change and become a productive citizen if he so desires.
F374
None Educational and Vocational Programs: Facts:
F375
Page 46
The school at PYCF provides 67% academic classes and 33% vocational training. The academic classes concentrate on wards earning a high school diploma, GED or passing the California High School Proficiency Examination (CHSPE).
F376
Page 46
There is also a correspondence college program for those wards with a high school diploma or GED.
F377
The teacher to student ratio is one to seventeen. 46 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report
F378
Page 47
Vocational training includes auto shop, computer graphics, graphic arts, culinary arts, restaurant service, general shop (orientation), janitorial and masonry.
F379
Page 47
The Ponderosa Fire Training Center, adjacent to the main institution, teaches physical fitness, teamwork, and fire science and safety to wards eligible for placement in Youth Conservation Camps. Ponderosa also has a community service work crew that does work for non-profit and public agencies. Findings:
F380
Page 47
The school at PYCF is very much like any school in California.
F381
Page 47
It is hard to compare year to year results from tests such as the STAR (Standardized Testing and Reporting) test and the High School Exit Examinations because the school does not have the same students each year.
F382
None Main Kitchen: Facts:
F383
Page 47
The main kitchen at PYCF was built in 1898 and is one of the oldest in the CYA and is a historical landmark.
F384
Page 47
All wards at PYCF are served two hot meals and one sack lunch per day, for a total of over 1500 meals per day served.
F385
Page 47
Wards work in the kitchen doing meal preparation and cleanup and are supervised by kitchen staff and a Youth Correctional Officer. Findings:
F386
Page 47
The kitchen was clean and well maintained.
F387
Page 47
The floors are tile and often wet from food preparation, cleaning and mopping. A special soap is used on the floor, which eats the grease to prevent build up.
F388
Page 47
Where the floors were wet, no “caution wet floor” signs were displayed.
F389
Page 47
Place “caution wet floor” signs around any floors that are wet. Response Required: The Amador County Grand Jury requires a response to this report per California Penal Code Section 933.05. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 47 Amador County Unified School District 48 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report Amador County Unified School District Introduction: The 2002-2003 Grand Jury elected to review and evaluate the Amador County School District (ACUSD) pursuant to Penal Code 933.5. Previous Grand Jury Reports have noted deficiencies in the Transportation Department and the vertical communication between the various departments and the Administration, including the School Board. These problems led to the District being sued by the Amador County District Attorney (DA), which resulted in the suspension of bus service in the District for a month. The operation of unsafe buses could result in serious injuries to students and the general public. Such injuries would expose the District to legal liability, which could result in financial ruin for the District. Prior Grand Jury Reports have also noted that the District had failed to address safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey done by their insurance carrier. These items if left unrepaired could easily lead to serious injury to students and others using school facilities. Compensating such injuries would strain the District’s already tight financial position. Further, a bond issue was passed to make improvements to the District infrastructure. The use of these funds in part to correct the safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey could make the District not only safer but also fiscally more responsible by taking care of maintenance problems when they are small. Maintenance procedures in the Transportation Department and throughout the District were examined to determine why these safety issues remained unresolved Method of Evaluation: Members of the 2002-2003 Grand Jury conducted interviews, reviewed documents, and visited sites. For a complete list, please see Appendix 1 and 2. ACUSD Board of Trustees: Background: On January 22, 2002, a parent called the California Highway Patrol (CHP), reporting a School District bus parked along a route with its rear axle lying beside it. On January 13, 2003 the Amador County Unified School District shut down its entire bus service for regular school students after meeting with CHP officials and the County District Attorney. The CHP had documented a four-year history of continuing violations of state bus safety requirements; they said it was the worst record they had ever seen anywhere in California. The bus terminal received four failing ratings during these years; the Highway Patrol had noted over 800 violations in the transportation operation in that period. The CHP had earlier taken their concerns and their documentation to the District Attorney, who initiated legal action to force the school district to correct the problems. The bus fleet remained out of service for a month and a half, while numerous repairs were made. Many parents attended Board meetings and two town hall meetings to express how concerned they were that their children would be safe on the busses. The District Attorney decided to work with the District in fashioning a Consent Decree, which laid out a course of corrective actions over a period of 14 months. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 49
F390
Page 47
The school at PYCF is very much like any school in California.
F391
Page 47
It is hard to compare year to year results from tests such as the STAR (Standardized Testing and Reporting) test and the High School Exit Examinations because the school does not have the same students each year.
F392
None Main Kitchen: Facts:
F393
Page 47
The main kitchen at PYCF was built in 1898 and is one of the oldest in the CYA and is a historical landmark.
F394
Page 47
All wards at PYCF are served two hot meals and one sack lunch per day, for a total of over 1500 meals per day served.
F395
Page 47
Wards work in the kitchen doing meal preparation and cleanup and are supervised by kitchen staff and a Youth Correctional Officer. Findings:
F396
Page 47
The kitchen was clean and well maintained.
F397
Page 47
The floors are tile and often wet from food preparation, cleaning and mopping. A special soap is used on the floor, which eats the grease to prevent build up.
F398
Page 47
Where the floors were wet, no “caution wet floor” signs were displayed.
F399
Page 47
Place “caution wet floor” signs around any floors that are wet. Response Required: The Amador County Grand Jury requires a response to this report per California Penal Code Section 933.05. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 47 Amador County Unified School District 48 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report Amador County Unified School District Introduction: The 2002-2003 Grand Jury elected to review and evaluate the Amador County School District (ACUSD) pursuant to Penal Code 933.5. Previous Grand Jury Reports have noted deficiencies in the Transportation Department and the vertical communication between the various departments and the Administration, including the School Board. These problems led to the District being sued by the Amador County District Attorney (DA), which resulted in the suspension of bus service in the District for a month. The operation of unsafe buses could result in serious injuries to students and the general public. Such injuries would expose the District to legal liability, which could result in financial ruin for the District. Prior Grand Jury Reports have also noted that the District had failed to address safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey done by their insurance carrier. These items if left unrepaired could easily lead to serious injury to students and others using school facilities. Compensating such injuries would strain the District’s already tight financial position. Further, a bond issue was passed to make improvements to the District infrastructure. The use of these funds in part to correct the safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey could make the District not only safer but also fiscally more responsible by taking care of maintenance problems when they are small. Maintenance procedures in the Transportation Department and throughout the District were examined to determine why these safety issues remained unresolved Method of Evaluation: Members of the 2002-2003 Grand Jury conducted interviews, reviewed documents, and visited sites. For a complete list, please see Appendix 1 and 2. ACUSD Board of Trustees: Background: On January 22, 2002, a parent called the California Highway Patrol (CHP), reporting a School District bus parked along a route with its rear axle lying beside it. On January 13, 2003 the Amador County Unified School District shut down its entire bus service for regular school students after meeting with CHP officials and the County District Attorney. The CHP had documented a four-year history of continuing violations of state bus safety requirements; they said it was the worst record they had ever seen anywhere in California. The bus terminal received four failing ratings during these years; the Highway Patrol had noted over 800 violations in the transportation operation in that period. The CHP had earlier taken their concerns and their documentation to the District Attorney, who initiated legal action to force the school district to correct the problems. The bus fleet remained out of service for a month and a half, while numerous repairs were made. Many parents attended Board meetings and two town hall meetings to express how concerned they were that their children would be safe on the busses. The District Attorney decided to work with the District in fashioning a Consent Decree, which laid out a course of corrective actions over a period of 14 months. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 49
F400
Page 47
The kitchen was clean and well maintained.
F401
Page 47
The floors are tile and often wet from food preparation, cleaning and mopping. A special soap is used on the floor, which eats the grease to prevent build up.
F402
Page 47
Where the floors were wet, no “caution wet floor” signs were displayed.
F403
Page 47
Place “caution wet floor” signs around any floors that are wet. Response Required: The Amador County Grand Jury requires a response to this report per California Penal Code Section 933.05. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 47 Amador County Unified School District 48 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report Amador County Unified School District Introduction: The 2002-2003 Grand Jury elected to review and evaluate the Amador County School District (ACUSD) pursuant to Penal Code 933.5. Previous Grand Jury Reports have noted deficiencies in the Transportation Department and the vertical communication between the various departments and the Administration, including the School Board. These problems led to the District being sued by the Amador County District Attorney (DA), which resulted in the suspension of bus service in the District for a month. The operation of unsafe buses could result in serious injuries to students and the general public. Such injuries would expose the District to legal liability, which could result in financial ruin for the District. Prior Grand Jury Reports have also noted that the District had failed to address safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey done by their insurance carrier. These items if left unrepaired could easily lead to serious injury to students and others using school facilities. Compensating such injuries would strain the District’s already tight financial position. Further, a bond issue was passed to make improvements to the District infrastructure. The use of these funds in part to correct the safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey could make the District not only safer but also fiscally more responsible by taking care of maintenance problems when they are small. Maintenance procedures in the Transportation Department and throughout the District were examined to determine why these safety issues remained unresolved Method of Evaluation: Members of the 2002-2003 Grand Jury conducted interviews, reviewed documents, and visited sites. For a complete list, please see Appendix 1 and 2. ACUSD Board of Trustees: Background: On January 22, 2002, a parent called the California Highway Patrol (CHP), reporting a School District bus parked along a route with its rear axle lying beside it. On January 13, 2003 the Amador County Unified School District shut down its entire bus service for regular school students after meeting with CHP officials and the County District Attorney. The CHP had documented a four-year history of continuing violations of state bus safety requirements; they said it was the worst record they had ever seen anywhere in California. The bus terminal received four failing ratings during these years; the Highway Patrol had noted over 800 violations in the transportation operation in that period. The CHP had earlier taken their concerns and their documentation to the District Attorney, who initiated legal action to force the school district to correct the problems. The bus fleet remained out of service for a month and a half, while numerous repairs were made. Many parents attended Board meetings and two town hall meetings to express how concerned they were that their children would be safe on the busses. The District Attorney decided to work with the District in fashioning a Consent Decree, which laid out a course of corrective actions over a period of 14 months. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 49
Recommendations 9
-
R1Page 39• None 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 39 Staff Accountability: Facts: • The Identix System is a computerized fingerprint identification system that stores data on employees who have entered and exited the secure perimeter. • It is mandatory that all employees use the Identix System when entering and exiting the secure perimeter. This system is located at the two entrances into the secure perimeter, the Front entrance Building and the Vehicle entrance (sally port). • The Identix System prints a report of personnel tracking within 30 to 60 minutes after each shift change. • Every employee on institutional grounds can be accounted for within 30 to 45 minutes. • Measures are immediately taken to locate a staff member if the employee is overdue for departure. • It is also mandatory for all employees to sign in and out on all shifts. Findings: • Keeping track of staff who enter the secure perimeter is high priority to the institution. • Upon entering and exiting the secure perimeter staff were observed using the Identix system. • Supervising staff members review the staffing rosters to ensure staff have signed in or out when reporting or leaving their assignments. If there is a discrepancy the supervisor takes immediate measures to account for that employee.
-
R2Page 40• None. Institution Security: Facts: • The front entrance and the vehicle sally port are the only access into the secured perimeter. • The front entrance and the vehicle sally port are each staffed by a correctional officer 16 hours a day and covered by the Outside Patrol Sergeant during the night shift. • The front entrance and the vehicle sally port are each overseen by a 24 hour perimeter tower staffed by armed correctional officers. The correctional officers in the towers control the gates electronically. • The Entrance Officer: Ensures each employee uses the Identix System, examines each staff member’s identification cards to ensure authenticity, searches items being brought in or out of the institution, processes official visitors to the institution and directs outside companies to various areas of the Institution. • The Vehicle Sally Port Officer: Positively identifies the individual(s) that are operating and occupying the vehicle and ensures they sign in and out. The officer also ensures employees use the Identix System when entering or exiting the secure perimeter through the vehicle sally port. The officer ensures inmate identification through the verification of 40 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report authorized inmate gate passes. Inmates are also identified and the officer reviews and ensures there is appropriate documentation and inmate gate passes are authorized and complete. • Inmates are also processed through the vehicle sally port by vehicle or controlled escort. • Every vehicle that is processed through the vehicle sally port is thoroughly searched inside and outside.
-
R3Page 41• None 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 41 Information Distribution: Facts: • Information is provided on a closed circuit video system by the Media Center supervised by a Television Specialist. The information consists of up coming changes in policies, which programs are operating normally or have been restricted, changes affecting inmate visiting, rule reminders and current events in the facilities, etc. • The Warden or the Administrative Assistant approves the information prior to its being displayed on this closed circuit video system. • Inmates with personal televisions and all dayroom televisions can receive this information on screen.
-
R4Page 42• None Medical and Mental Health Services: Facts: • There are inmates housed at MCSP that have been identified as being developmentally disabled, with mental illnesses and inmates with less severe physical disabilities that do not have an impact on their housing needs. These inmates are tracked and their mental and medical needs are met. • A new Mental Health Services building is in the process of being built to accommodate the needs of the inmates assigned to the Mental Health Delivery System. • MCSP is staffed with various medical personnel to serve the needs of the inmate population. These employees include medical doctors, nurses, medical technical assistants, dentists, psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed clinical social workers, pharmacists, dietitian, laboratory technicians and radiologists, etc. There are specialty clinics that include services for optometry, podiatry, physical therapy and others. • Each facility has a medical and dental clinic. Inmates are charged a $5.00 co-payment for non-emergency medical and dental services. • The Main infirmary has an emergency room, which is equipped and maintained at all times to receive inmates with urgent medical issues. Other inmate medical emergencies or severe health conditions are transported to outside hospitals or other prisons that can accommodate their medical needs. The Main Infirmary is in the process of being renovated for expansion.
-
R5Page 43• None Response Required: None. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 43 Preston Youth Correctional Facility Introduction: Penal Code Section 919(b) mandates that the Grand Jury annually review all prisons and jails within the County. Background: Juveniles committed by juvenile and criminal courts to the California Youth Authority (CYA) are sent to Preston Youth Correctional Facility (PYCF) for treatment and training. The CYA is the largest youth corrections agency in the nation, housing some 5,700 young men and women in eleven institutions and four camps throughout the state, with approximately 4,200 more on parole. PYCF was one of the first two state youthful offender facilities (Reform schools) mandated by the state in 1890 to remove juvenile offenders from adult prisons. The historic landmark "Preston Castle" opened June 13, 1894; many more structures and facilities have been built over the years. PYCF has historically been a role model for innovations in juvenile corrections nationwide. Fourteen living units provide housing, five with rooms which are either single bunked or double bunked, and nine open dormitories. Three of the dormitories have been closed due to declining population. Six specialized treatment programs are offered. Method of Evaluation: Members of the Grand Jury conducted interviews and toured the Preston Youth Correctional Facility. Persons interviewed: Superintendent Assistant Superintendent Chief of Security Training Officer Senior Youth Correctional Counselors Youth Correctional Counselors Youth Correctional Officers Principal of Education Kitchen Staff Stationary Engineer Wards Inmates 44 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report Documents Examined: Welfare and Institution Codes Internet Sites: California Department of the Youth Authority: http://www.cya.ca.gov California Senate: http://www.sen.ca.gov Fresno Bee: http://www.fresnobee.com Demographics: Facts: • PYCF houses male offenders, most between 17 and 19 years of age. The CYA can house offenders up to their 25th birthday. • The offenders are wards of the state or are inmates, juveniles tried as adults. • At the time of the Grand Jury’s first visit in November 2002 to PYCF the population was 560. The population was 511 on a subsequent visit in April 2003. • PYCF has closed three living units in the last 12 months with the most recent occurring on April 1, 2003. • Section 912 of the California Welfare and Institution Code (W & I Code), amended in 1997, states the counties of California will pay a sliding scale percentage of the per capita cost to house a ward in the CYA ranging from 50% to 100% depending on the seriousness of the crime. For many years prior to this the cost to the counties for a ward committed to the CYA was around $300 per year. • The ward per capita cost for 2002/2003 is $49,200. The cost to counties for a ward committed to the CYA can be $24,600 to $49,200 per year. Findings: • The CYA population is declining due to legislative mandates requiring the state to charge counties for CYA commitments. • Counties are keeping juvenile offenders in juvenile halls or county camps. As an example, Fresno County Probation Department, Fresno County had 219 commitments to the CYA at a cost of $109,676 in 1995/1996 fiscal year. The cost increased to $3.8 million in fiscal year 1999/2000 for 110 new commitments to the CYA. • Several CYA Institutions will be closed in the near future. At this time it is undetermined if Preston will be closed. • PYCF has provided community service and economic stability to Ione and Amador County for over one hundred years. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 45
-
R6Page 46• None Treatment Programs: Facts: • There is one living unit that offers a formalized program for wards and inmates with substance abuse problems or the potential for substance abuse problems. • There is an Intensive Treatment Program and a Specialized Counseling Program to assist wards with severe emotional problems. • Wards in these treatment programs are housed in single bunked rooms. Findings: • The wards were living in a safe, secure and clean environment. • Staff appeared interested and cared about the ward’s progress in their treatment goals. • Wards interviewed were able to discuss program goals and their growth in these specialized programs. • The administrators, supervisors, counselors, custody staff, and other personnel have a good working relationship with each other and were very informative. The facility is managed in a professional and yet personable manner, with safety and security of staff and the wards the main concern. • The programs observed afford a ward the realistic opportunity to gain the personal skills and, the basic vocational skills to make a life change and become a productive citizen if he so desires.
-
R7Page 46• None Educational and Vocational Programs: Facts: • The school at PYCF provides 67% academic classes and 33% vocational training. The academic classes concentrate on wards earning a high school diploma, GED or passing the California High School Proficiency Examination (CHSPE). • There is also a correspondence college program for those wards with a high school diploma or GED. • The teacher to student ratio is one to seventeen. 46 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report • Vocational training includes auto shop, computer graphics, graphic arts, culinary arts, restaurant service, general shop (orientation), janitorial and masonry. • The Ponderosa Fire Training Center, adjacent to the main institution, teaches physical fitness, teamwork, and fire science and safety to wards eligible for placement in Youth Conservation Camps. Ponderosa also has a community service work crew that does work for non-profit and public agencies. Findings: • The school at PYCF is very much like any school in California. • It is hard to compare year to year results from tests such as the STAR (Standardized Testing and Reporting) test and the High School Exit Examinations because the school does not have the same students each year.
-
R8Page 47• None Main Kitchen: Facts: • The main kitchen at PYCF was built in 1898 and is one of the oldest in the CYA and is a historical landmark. • All wards at PYCF are served two hot meals and one sack lunch per day, for a total of over 1500 meals per day served. • Wards work in the kitchen doing meal preparation and cleanup and are supervised by kitchen staff and a Youth Correctional Officer. Findings: • The kitchen was clean and well maintained. • The floors are tile and often wet from food preparation, cleaning and mopping. A special soap is used on the floor, which eats the grease to prevent build up. • Where the floors were wet, no “caution wet floor” signs were displayed.
-
R9Page 47• Place “caution wet floor” signs around any floors that are wet. Response Required: The Amador County Grand Jury requires a response to this report per California Penal Code Section 933.05. 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report 47 Amador County Unified School District 48 2002-2003 Grand Jury Final Report Amador County Unified School District Introduction: The 2002-2003 Grand Jury elected to review and evaluate the Amador County School District (ACUSD) pursuant to Penal Code 933.5. Previous Grand Jury Reports have noted deficiencies in the Transportation Department and the vertical communication between the various departments and the Administration, including the School Board. These problems led to the District being sued by the Amador County District Attorney (DA), which resulted in the suspension of bus service in the District for a month. The operation of unsafe buses could result in serious injuries to students and the general public. Such injuries would expose the District to legal liability, which could result in financial ruin for the District. Prior Grand Jury Reports have also noted that the District had failed to address safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey done by their insurance carrier. These items if left unrepaired could easily lead to serious injury to students and others using school facilities. Compensating such injuries would strain the District’s already tight financial position. Further, a bond issue was passed to make improvements to the District infrastructure. The use of these funds in part to correct the safety issues set out in the Loss Prevention Survey could make the District not only safer but also fiscally more responsible by taking care of maintenance problems when they are small. Maintenance procedures in the Transportation Department and throughout the District were examined to determine why these safety issues remained unresolved Method of Evaluation: Members of the 2002-2003 Grand Jury conducted interviews, reviewed documents, and visited sites. For a complete list, please see