⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 4 findings
F1
0 The number of inmates in the minimum-security section at RCCC will likely continue to decrease as a percentage of the total inmate population as the courts pursue alternatives to incarceration for low-risk non-violent offenders. As a consequence an increase in the custodylevel of inmates will occur.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
2 The Sacramento CountyBoard of Supervisors, the Sacramento CountySheriff, and RCCC should develop and adopt a long-term comprehensive plan, to address the needs of the changing inmate population.
F2
0 The aging infrastructure of RCCC, with its abundance of fences and key-locked gates, is labor intensive and requires higher staffing levels to insure the safetyof staff and inmates.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
1 The Sacramento CountyBoard of Supervisors and the Sacramento County Sheriff should staff RCCC to the level recommended by the Corrections Standards Authority, the Inspector General and internal management.
F3
0 The modular classrooms are remote and deputyresponse to an emergency situation maynot occur in sufficient time to avoid a major incident.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
1 The RCCC Management Team should provide a personal alarm device for summoning assistance to the adult education teachers.
F4
0 The Sandra Larsen Facility for female inmates offers a vocational program not available at the SCMJ.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
1 Funding to house female inmates and the vocational education program at the Sandra Larsen Facility should continue. Response Requirements Penal Code sections 933 and 933.05 require that specific responses to all findings and recommendations contained in this report be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Sacramento County Superior Court by October 1, 2010, from: · The Sacramento County Board of Supervisors · Sacramento County Sheriff John McGinness Mail or hand-deliver a hard copy of the response to: Hon. Steve White, Presiding Judge Sacramento County Superior Court 720 9th Street, Dept. Sacramento, CA 95814 In addition, email the response to Becky Castaneda, Grand Jury Coordinator, at castanb@saccourt.com 136
No Responses Found 2
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Sacramento County Board of Supervisors
Elected County Office
Sacramento County Sheriff
Elected County Office