San Diego County Grand Jury • 2018-2019

Executive Summary The 2018/2019 San Diego County Grand Jury (Grand Jury) determined that, even though San Diego County

Published: May 30, 2019 19 pages

View Original PDF

⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.

⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

Findings 9 findings

F01

Despite the recommendations made in the 2014 CSEC Advisory Council report, there is still a critical shortage of beds for both adult and juvenile human trafficking victims in San Diego.

F02

Many victims of human trafficking fall within the broad definitions of homelessness and mental illness, and should qualify for funding under Proposition 2.

F03

SB 1193, requiring businesses to display human trafficking posters, is not being enforced in many areas of San Diego County.

F04

There is a positive correlation between foster care placement and CSEC susceptibility.

F05

Training for current and prospective foster parents/resource families does not include a mandatory module in CSEC recognition signs, based on the CSEC 101 training syllabus.

F06

The RISE Court can be a significant step in transforming a victim, or potential victim, of human trafficking into a survivor.

F07

Having its own budget and performance outcome measurements would give the RISE Court and its participants a greater sense of sustainability.

F08

Federal and State grant funding is available for housing and service programs for human trafficking victims.

F09

A CSEC Advisory Council section on the County website would make its work more transparent and increase its ability to share data with similar agencies other counties.

Recommendations 11

R10

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation http://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-We-Work/General-Information/Grant-Seeking- Resources
R11

United States Government Grants http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/home Source: Human Trafficking in California: Toolkit for Judicial Officers, Judicial Council of California, 2017, . 18
19-26
Page 15

Consider a collaboration that could develop multiple model/shelter programs in
19-27
Page 15

Consider evaluating whether human trafficking victims fall within the definitions of
19-28
Page 15

In conjunction with the Office of the District Attorney, consider taking steps to
19-29
Page 15

Consider establishing separate pro-rated funding for the RISE Court, for the County
19-30
Page 15

Consider taking steps to establish a process to develop performance indicators for
19-31
Page 15

Consider evaluating ways to provide transportation to the RISE Court to facilitate
19-32
Page 15

Consider evaluating the feasibility of requiring elementary training in CSEC for all
19-33
Page 15

Consider determing whether the San Diego County Regional Human Trafficking and
19-34
Page 15

In conjunction with the County of San Diego's Chief Administrative Officer, consider

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

San Diego County County