⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 3 findings
F1
The Grand Jury's review of relevant documentation indicated that the 1979-1980 disagreement over the property access easement was eliminated with the quitclaim of a “non-exclusive right of way” given back to the City by the original owner in 1984.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
The City was obligated under the provisions of the 1978 Eminent Domain action to abandon the temporary easement upon completion of the waste line construction, and did so in 1979.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
The Colfax City Council indicated a willingness to meet with all parties who live adjacent to and share Grandview Road. The City Council, however, has failed to effectively communicate this willingness to all of the affected parties.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The City should make its offer known officially to all Grandview Road residents to determine the acceptability of the City's proposal and obtain an agreement or enter into meaningful negotiations to resolve the mutual problem. Respondents Colfax City Council Colfax City Manager RESPONSE REQUIRED WITHIN 90 DAYS TO: The Honorable Larry D. Gaddis Presiding Judge, Superior Court County of Placer Historic Courthouse 101 Maple Street Auburn, CA 95603
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Colfax
City