📋

Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Score: -1 (0/0/1)

Riverside County Grand Jury • 2006-2007

Elsinore Valley*

Published: August 30, 2007 3 pages

View PDF View Full Original

⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.

⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

Findings and recommendations have not been extracted yet.

The full report content may still be accessible via the PDF link above.

Agency Responses 1

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.

Moreno Valley Unified School District (MVUSD)

October 19, 2007 • 2 responses • Score: -1 (+0, 0, -1) View Details ▾

PDF

2 responses to findings and recommendations

The Board of Supervisors direct an immediate comprehensive administrative and financial audit of ETS and ITF bringing them into compliance with the BOS Resolution 83-338 and Government Code §25250 mandating audits be performed every two years.

Response: Unknown

Score: 0

r 1, 2004. The auditor's report incorporates those duties and responsibilities on pages 9 and 10. There is no indication in the auditor's report that the duties of the Disbursing Officer are ill-defined. For example, on page 10 of the auditor's report, the auditor concludes that the District "has established and adopted policies and procedures by which there are clear District processes for cash receipts and accounts receivable. . . . As such, no impediments to the District's pursuit of fiscal independence are noted in this area." The auditor further concluded that disbursement functions would...

R15

Develop and utilize a central database to track mandatory training and specialized supervisory training. Appoint sufficient personnel resources to maintain the training records.

Response: Will Not Implement

Score: -1

r 15, 2004: Completely define the duties of the Disbursing Officer. Response The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable. The duties of the Disbursing Officer have already been completely defined. These duties were accepted by RCOE and the RCOE appointed auditors. The District will continue to require that the Disbursing Officer fulfill such duties. Establish policy and procedures for the Disbursing Officer. . Response The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable. Policies and procedures for the Disb...

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.