San Joaquin County Grand Jury • 2004-2005 • Agency Response

Office of Sheriff-coroner ==== County of San Joaquin*

Published: May 02, 2005 3 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 7 findings

F1
Procedures are now in place to maintain restraint belts. Response to Finding #1: The Department agrees with the finding. Procedures for the maintenance of restraint belts were devised as part of a revision to the Correctional Health Care Services Policy and Procedure Manual, Procedure number 607A, which calls for inspection and maintenance of restraint belts by Psych staff every day. Completion of a documentation form is also required.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Develop and implement a time schedule for replacing restraint belts.
F2
Alternative belt styles and belt materials are being evaluated. Response to Finding #2: The Department agrees in part with the finding. The evaluation of alternative belt styles and materials has now been completed. It was determined that the alternative styles and materials were not conducive to both officer nor inmate safety, thus the Department has continued to use restraints of original design and material, albeit new. The department is still working with the manufacturer on an improved design of the alternative style that will accommodate the Department's needs. ÷ CD-32 Honorable Robert McNatt May 2, 2005
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Program the pre-booking screening questionnaire to require a mandatory response in the "Officer's Observation" field. The Pre-Booking Officer should not be allowed to complete the pre-booking screening without entering a response in the "Officer's Observation" field.
F3
Alternative positions are being used in the five-point restraint bed. Inmates are placed on their backs unless a medical condition exists. A foam wedge is used to elevate the inmate's head. The inmate's hands are secured at the sides of the bed rather than at the upper corners of the bed. Response to Finding #3: The Department agrees with the finding. This new procedure is consistent with procedure(s) being used in mental health facilities.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Sergeants in command must approve all plans of action. Response to Finding #4: The Department agrees with the finding. Sergeants now are directly supervising the placement of any inmate into five-point restraints.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
All incidents requiring action by the C.E.R.T. team are being videotaped. Response to Finding #5: The Department agrees with this finding. The videotaping of critical incidents involving the C.E.R.T. team will be used for training purposes to improve techniques and procedures used during those incidents. Additionally, all restraint chair incidents and five-point restraint incidents are videotaped, even if there is no C.E.R.T. team involvement.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Additional questions have been added to the pre-book screening process to address possible infection of communicable diseases and drug use. Response to Finding #6: The Department agrees with this finding. These additional screens have been added to the pre-book process to obtain additional and more detailed information about an inmate's condition.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
An arrestee's medical history cannot be included in the pre-book process without violating Federal medical privacy rules. Response to Finding #7: The Department disagrees with this finding. There is a valid and necessary penalogical interest in obtaining certain information about an arrestee's medical history in order to provide proper medical care to all inmates in the custody of the Department. Obtaining this medical information is required by Title 15 of the ٠. ? Honorable Robert McNatt May 2, 2005 California Code of Regulations, Section 1207, and is authorized under the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Section 164.512 (cite: 45CFR1640512).
No recommendations for this finding

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.