Sacramento County Grand Jury • 2004-2005

Homeland Security: Ready or Not?

Published: June 30, 2005 1 pages
View Original PDF

Findings 12 findings

F1
The staff of the Main Jail was negligent in allowing inmate mail drops to remain unsecured and at risk of being accessed by other inmates. The Grand Jury was advised that a total of 16 mail drops needed to be made secure.
F2
Jail floor officers did not notify maintenance personnel of defective slots so repairs could be made in a timely manner.
F3
Jail staff, in responding to inmate complaints of mail not received or delayed mail delivery, instructed inmates to review the rules regarding correspondence in the Inmate Handbook.
F4
Neither the County nor the City has effectively integrated the participation of private industry in homeland security.
F5
No substantial effort has been undertaken to educate and train the public at large on how to respond to a weapon of mass destruction event.
F6
A standard operational plan for law enforcement, fire suppression, and emergency medical services that prescribes the roles and responsibilities of responders to a weapon of mass destruction event is still under development.
F7
The County is significantly short of the federal benchmark for “surge capacity” hospital beds and may not have adequate treatment capability in the event of a large scale medical emergency.
F8
There is no written plan for transporting emergency medical supplies which have arrived at a location designated by the State from national repositories to the sites where they are needed.
F9
The City has recently acquired a “reverse 9-1-1” automatic telephone warning system as a means of instant communication with residents of the regional urban area, concerning imminent danger arising from a weapon of mass destruction event, along with appropriate directives and instructions. The County has not yet demonstrated a similar capability for the non urban area of the County.
F10
The compatibility of communication technology between law enforcement, fire suppression, and emergency medical, and other related services has been extended to a wide array of state and local agencies in the region. Almost all agencies that need to communicate during an emergency have adopted a common system. However, adjustments to the antennas in Walnut Grove are needed to improve portable coverage for the Galt/Isleton area which is not fully aligned with SRRCS.
F11
No substantial effort has been undertaken to assess the capability of mobilizing the region’s public employees as disaster service workers. Sacramento County Grand Jury June 30, 2005
F12
July 16, 2003 memo from Kronick to the Council regarding newly adopted legislation on how to disclose conflict of interest issues at a public meeting

Recommendations 12