📋

Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Monterey County Grand Jury • 2018-2019

2018 - 19. Monterey County Civil Grand Jury Final Report

Published: June 24, 2019 243 pages

View PDF View Full Original

⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.

⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F2, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11, F12, F13, F14, F15, F16, F17

Findings 5 findings

Active Shooter (e.g., ALICE ®),

Anti-Bullying (including tolerance, harassment, and conflict resolution),

When, how, why, and to whom stakeholders should report issues of violence concern, and

How to assess and mitigate potential threats of violence when they occur are applicable to the following school stakeholders: • Principals • School resource officers (when used) • On campus probation officers (when used) • Security officers (including campus monitors) • Substitute teachers • Special needs teachers • General education teachers 146

F18

Recommendations: R1, R2, R4, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20,

Recommendations 3

R1

Lack of leadership and oversight from the BoS and the Health Department, 1 Link to: Rooster Keeping Ordinance 5249 2 https://www.co.monterey.ca.us/home/showdocument?id=16498 3 https://caselaw.lexroll.com/2019/02/21/perez-v-county-of-monterey-no-h044364-cal-app-2-14-2019/ 176
R2

The hindrance to implementation and enforcement created by a process developed by Environmental Health Bureau, and
R3

The unwillingness of multiple agencies to enforce it. Monterey County needs to enforce its rooster keeping operations ordinance. All agencies involved must coordinate their efforts to end illegal rooster keeping and the associated crime and disease. Monterey County has a legal ordinance. Monterey County should enforce it with equanimity and impartiality. The MCCGJ agrees with this quotation from the summary of Perez V. County of Monterey.4 “The County has an interest in establishing humane and sanitary standards for the keeping of roosters." It is the recommendation of the MCCGJ that The Ordinance should be immediately implemented and enforced in Monterey County.