📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Plumas County Grand Jury • 2017-2018

InvitedResponses

16 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 6 findings

F2 Page 9
The 2017-2018 Plumas County Civil Grand Jury finds that the emergency power generator for the Animal Shelter is ineffective since it is not connected to the building. Furthermore, an operation manual is not available and employees are not trained on the operation of the generator.
F3 Page 9
The 2017-2018 Plumas County Civil Grand Jury finds that the security camera systems recording features are unusable due to a lost password preventing access to the system.
F4 Page 9
The 2017-2018 Plumas County Civil Grand Jury finds that the Animal Shelter security camera system is ineffective because the monitor showing the live feed from the six security cameras is located in a storeroom.
F5 Page 9
The 2017-2018 Plumas County Civil Grand Jury finds that reports and records required by the State of California are manually recorded into a notebook rather than by computer making for an arduous and time-consuming process for employees.
F6 Page 9
The 2017-2018 Plumas County Civil Grand Jury finds that usingjail inmates at the Animal Shelter is not practical because inmates cannot be properly supervised.
F7 Page 9
The 2017-2018 Plumas County Civil Grand Jury finds that the Animal Control Supervisor is not included in the Sheriff Department budget process. FS. The 2017-2018 Plumas County Civil Grand Jury finds that the Animal Shelter's operational efficiency may improve with an office policy and procedure manual.

Recommendations 6