Placer County Grand Jury • 2015-2016

Placer County Grand Jury Newcastle Fire Protection District Measure F Accounting and Accountability June 23, 2016

Published: June 23, 2016 17 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 7 findings

F1
It is not readily apparent to the general public that the Newcastle Fire Protection District Budget accounting code 8105 Special Tax is combination revenue from both Measure F and Measure B. Therefore, it is not clear to the public that Measure F funds are being spent on firefighter’s salaries and benefits.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Newcastle Fire Protection District adhere to the appeals and exception processes as set forth in Measure F and Measure B.
F2
Revenue generated from Measure F assessments is less than annual employee salaries and benefits. According to the Auditor-Controller’s reconciliation of Newcastle Fire Protection District revenues and expenses, firefighter wages have consistently been greater than the revenue generated by Measure F. Therefore, the Grand Jury has determined that revenues from Measure F were spent on firefighter’s salaries and benefits.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The revenue generated from Measure F and Measure B be designated with separate accounting codes in the Newcastle Fire Protection District budget.
F3
Accounting code 8105 Special Tax revenues for Measure F and B for Fiscal Years 2013- 2014 and 2014-2015 virtually mirrors the Auditor-Controller’s reconciliation of the same accounting periods.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The Newcastle Fire Protection District develop an off-site storage and back-up of assessment records, including appeal and exception requests, in coordination with a recovery plan in the event records are lost or destroyed.
F4
There is no internal review of the Measure F or Measure B assessments for accuracy.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
At least one Board Member and the Fire Chief are cross trained in the operations and calculations of the property owner assessments to ensure accurate processing.
F5
The Newcastle Fire Protection District lacks any access to a back up of assessment records or a recovery plan if the records are lost or destroyed.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
At least one of the cross trained individuals also check the final calculations for accuracy of any property exceptions.
F6
The Newcastle Fire Protection District is not following the procedural requirements set forth in Measure F and Measure B for handling requests for appeals and exceptions.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
To guarantee accuracy, consistency, and transparency to property owners, the Newcastle Fire Protection District publish online, by Assessor Parcel Number, Measure F and Measure B assessments along with all exceptions that have been granted.
F7
The Newcastle Fire Protection District indicated in their 2013 response that they would implement several of the 2012-2013 Grand Jury recommendations. Recommendations #1 through #3 have not been implemented and are still applicable as they would improve transparency and accountability. Conclusion The Grand Jury concludes the revenue generated from Measure F is being properly allocated to firefighter’s salaries and benefits. However, the Newcastle Fire Protection District, like all special districts, has a duty to run its organization in a transparent, accountable, and responsible manner. The Newcastle Fire Protection District is not meeting this obligation to improve transparency and accountability. The pubic trust is diminished when the Board fails to implement Grand Jury recommendations they agreed to and stated would be implemented. The proper processing and safeguarding of special tax assessment records is not being given proper attention at Newcastle Fire Protection District. Just as the district has invested in new firefighting equipment to best serve its residents; it also needs to invest in an off-site back up record keeping system. The differing language of Measure F and Measure B governing the appeals and exception process for property owners presents a unique bureaucratic challenge for the Newcastle Fire Protection District. Nonetheless, it is the Board’s responsibility to ensure that each Measure’s specific language is followed. With the proper training and written procedures in place, the Newcastle Fire Protection District can improve the accuracy, consistency, and accountability of the Measure F and Measure B appeals and exception process.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
There be a printed form at the Newcastle Fire Protection District office, and available online, for use by property owners in the appeals and exceptions process as outlined in both Measure F and Measure B (See Attachments A and B).

Additional Recommendations 4

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.

Conclusions 1