Mendocino County Grand Jury
• 2001-2002
Foster Care-Foster Parent Issues The Grand Jury has looked at various issues regarding Foster Care in 1995– 96,
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 4 findings
F1
In the 1995–96 Grand Jury Report “Review of Child Protective Services (CPS)” Recommendation 2 stated: “A position for training CPS personnel and foster parents should be established.” Family and Children’s Services (FCS) established positions for foster parent liaison, recruitment, and training, but they have often been vacant. Throughout the County, there are now three Social Worker foster placement positions (one vacant) and a Senior Analyst foster parent recruitment and training person.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
In the 1997–98 Grand Jury Report “Department of Social Services and Foster Parents,” Recommendation 2 stated: “FCS develop and distribute an up-to-date foster parent handbook.” FCS developed a new Foster Parent handbook and reported that it had been distributed to Foster Parents. Recent witnesses stated that all foster parents have not received handbooks and that other long-term foster parents are not receiving updates to the handbooks.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
The 1997–98 report Recommendation 3 stated: “CPS should implement the use of a health and education record for foster children.” The 2000– 2001 Grand Jury report stated that DSS had implemented this and provided a Health and Education Passport notebook. Policy/Procedure Letter 6:99 “Health and Education Passport” states the procedures for use of the notebook. At least one foster parent, taking care of a child with special needs, did not get information that should have been included in the Health and Education Passport notebook. The foster parent received the notebook, but it only contained a Medical card. The foster parent updated notebook, but when FCS moved the child to another foster home, the passport notebook did not go with the child. No one from FCS asked for the notebook. In another case, the notebook did not contain information about a child’s critical need for therapy services. FCS now has nurses responsible for recording medical information and a clerk responsible for getting and recording education information. There is a sign off sheet for receipt of the Health and Education Passport, but no checklist for any other information FCS gives to a Foster Parent, such the “Shelter Care Placement Progress/Discharge Report,” “Placement Evaluation,” and the “Needs and Services Plan.” There is no sign-off sheet for return of the Health and Education Passport or any other documents.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
The 1997–98 Report, Recommendation 7 stated: “FCS should hold quarterly meetings between FCS and the Foster Parent Association to provide a forum for mutual communication.” FCS responded that they would implement this recommendation. In 2001–02, the voluntary Foster Parent Association was not functioning and FCS staff could not meet quarterly with the group.
No recommendations for this finding
Comments 1
-
CO1The 2002–03 Grand Jury review the Foster Care program, including foster homes and care of children. Response Required Mendocino County Board of Supervisors Response Requested Mendocino County Department of Social Services Director 2001-2002 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report 70
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Mendocino County Board of Supervisors
Elected County Office