Riverside County Grand Jury • 2012-2013 • Agency Response
Response to: Riverside County Water and Sanitation Districts, Compensation and

cost of doing business*

Published: August 14, 2013 4 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 3 findings

F1 Page 1
The Grand Jury, in its review of water and sanitation districts servicing Riverside County, found that 15 out of29 districts provided benefit packages to some boards of directors. These packages may have included such medical benefits as dental, vision and life insurance (See Table C); in some cases retirement benefits were paid for by the districts. Some ofthese insurance benefits were offered to the spouses and/or families of board members. It must be noted that these benefits given to the directors are voted on by the directors themselves. These are benefits that are generally given to full-time employees of the districts. State law established the amount of stipend a director may receive for attending meetings; however, there are no regulations on the amount of benefits a director may receive. This has resulted in some districts having an average director's total compensation in excess of $40,000 (See Table C). The review of district financial data indicated these benefits were added to the district's direct operating cost and - were ultimately passed on to the rate payer as "cost of doing business." Don Rapp, August 14, 2013 Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Grand Jury Findings:
No recommendations for this finding
F2
The California Public Records Act (CPRA) was passed in 1968, requiring inspection and/or disclosure of governmental records to the public upon request, unless exempted by law. The CPRA is currently codified as California Government Codes §6250 through§ 6276.48. The legislature enacted CPRA, and §6250 expressly declared that "access to information concerning the conduct of the people's business is a fundamental and necessary right of every person in this state" and it emphasized that maximum disclosure of the conduct of governmental operations [is] to be promoted by the act." By promoting prompt public access to government records, the CPRA is "intended to safeguard the accountability of government to the public." (CBS v. Block, 42 Cal. 3d 646 n.5, 230 Dal.Rptr.362, 725 P.2d370 (1986). This "prompt public" accessibility to water and sanitation district public documents is achieved through district websites. Of the 29 water and sanitation districts studied, 6 districts had no website available to their ratepayers: Cabazon County Water District (CCWD) . Fern Valley Water District (FVWD) • Chiriaco Summit Water District (CSWD) . Edgemont Community Services District (ECSD) . Home Gardens County Water District (HGCWD) . Home Gardens Sanitary District (HGSD). • Those districts which had websites available provided varying amounts of public documents as guided by the California Public Records Act. While some districts had created and maintained websites, not all websites remained current to reflect public meeting changes, updated minutes and agendas, and updated financial reports and audits. During the investigation, the Grand Jury utilized a number of sources to acquire data. One very important source of public documents was the best practice of providing websites which are operated by the 23 districts themselves. There was a wide disparity in the availability of data, its ease of finding, and the timeliness of the information. This did not necessarily correlate with the size of the district. Some large, sophisticated districts had limited online access to compensation and financial data, while some smaller districts excelled. A keystone in improving public confidence in local government operation is to make operating information easily available and demonstrate nothing is hidden. P.O. Box 1058 Coachella, CA 92236 www.cvwd.org Phone (760) 398-2651 Fax (760) 398-3711 Don Rapp, August 14, 2013 District websites were reviewed for inclusion of the following items of transparency:
No recommendations for this finding
F3
the day rather than in the evening when working rate payers are able to attend. These include: Chiriaco Summit Water District (CSWD) . Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) . Desert Water Agency (DWA) . Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) . San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (SBVMWD) . Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) . San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency (SGPWA) Lake Hemet Municipal Water District (LHMWD) Valley Sanitary District (VSD) Mission Springs Water District (MSWD) Rubidoux Community Services District (RCSD) West Valley Water District (WVWD) Lee Lake Water District (LLWD) Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) P.O. Box 1058 Coachella, CA 92236 www.cvwd.org Phone (760) 398-2651 Fax (760) 398-3711 Don Rapp, August 14, 2013 Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Grand Jury Recommendation One: Before raising any water and/or sewer rates, water and sanitation districts providing insurance and/or retirement benefits to its directors shall reduce or eliminate these full-time benefit packages for part-time directors. Response: The recommendation has been implemented. Prior to the publication of the Grand Jury Report, effective January 1, 2013, the CVWD Board of Directors reduced its benefit package through the elimination of Medi-Gap insurance coverage for new directors and spouses. This decision was one of many cost-cutting measures made in lieu of increased water and sewer rates. The last time the board approved domestic water or sewer rate increases was in 2010. The board has not increased meeting compensation since 2008. Grand Jury Recommendation Two: This recommendation was not made to CVWD. No response required. Grand Jury Recommendation Three: Water and sanitation district Boards of Directors shall conduct board meetings after 6 p.m. to ensure maximum participation by ratepayers, and generate maximum public attendance. Response: The recommendation requires further analysis. Following review of the Grand Jury
No recommendations for this finding

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.