Yuba County Grand Jury • 2010-2011 • Agency Response
Response to: GJR2010-2011 Final Report

Required Responses to Findings and Recommendations With the forgoing principles and issues in mind, the Superintendent

Published: August 23, 2011 24 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 5 findings

F1 Page 6
"Members of the Grand Jury found that thee/ood service at MHS is an efficient operation with a tasty, nutritious, varied menu that provides many options to the students who do have an ample opportunity to enjoy their lunch. " • Response to Finding 1: Agree The District agrees that the food service at MHS is an efficient operation with a tasty, nutritious, and varied menu that provides many options to the students.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Page 7
"The Grand Jury commends the Marysville High School Principal, Food Service Manager and stafffor performing the difficult task ofproviding a varied menu and nutritious meals in a first-rate manner. " • . Response to Recommendation 1: Nothing to Implement Since no actual recommendation is being made, the District cannot address any such implementation. That said, the Superintendent is appreciative of the commendation.
F2 Page 6
"Members of the Grand Jury did not observe any early suspension of service. " • Response to Finding 2: Agree The District agrees that no early suspension of service has occurred.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Page 11
The Yuba County Grand Jury recommends the Yuba County Board ofSupervisors commend the Sheriffand the Sheriff's office for their excellent work. ! The Yuba County Board ofSupervisors agrees with the recommendation and will consider the appropriate level ofcommendation for our Sheriff and members ofthe Sheriffs office for their dedication to public safety. Each member ofthe Board of Supervisors recognizes the tremendous effort put forward by members dfthe Sheriffs Office and as a result, the citizens ofYuba County have benefited greatly by making our commJnities a much safer place to live. The Board ofSupervisors thanks the 2010-2011 Grand Jury for their dedication oftime and commends each member for their valuable community service. . ' I Sincerely, ~haITm~ Yuba County Board of Supervisors SUPERVISORS ! Andy V Ilsquez - District 1 • John Nicoletti - District 2 • Mary Jane Griego - District 3 • Roger Abe - District 4 • Hal Stocker - District 5 The County of Yuba 915 8m Street, Ste. Marysville, California 95901 OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS (530) 749-7510 (530) 749-7353 FAX August 23, 2011 The Honorable Debra L. Givens Grand Jury Presiding Judge Yuba County Superior Court 215 Fifth Street, Suite 200 Marysville, CA 95901 Re: RESPONSE TO 2010/11 GRAND JURY Dear Judge Givens, Provided pursuant to Penal Code Section 933(c ) are the comments from the Board of Supervisors related to the recommendation contained in the 2010/11 Grand Jury Final Report Animal Care services. Consistent with Section 933(c), responses do not address departments under control of elected officials or outside agencies, except where a specific response was solicited and then our response is consistent with provisions of Penal Code Section 933.05(c). RECOMMENDATIONS
F3 Page 6
"Memb~rs of the Grand Jury did not observe any student being denied a meal. " • Response to Finding 3: Agree The District agrees that no students have been denied a meal.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Page 18
The Yuba County Board ofSupervisors should commend the staffand volunteers ofACS and the Yuba County Sheriff'S Department for their efforts in maintaining a healthy and safe atmosphere for the animals they care for. The Yuba County Board of Supervisors agrees with the recommendation and joins our Sheriff in recognizing the outstanding service provided by our staff and volunteers. The Board will discuss an appropriate method to commend our Animal Care Services staff and volunteers for their dedication to the citizens of Yuba County. The Board ofSupervisors thanks the 2010-2011 Grand Jury for their dedication oftime and commends each member for their valuable community service. Sincerely, cL (~;t:.-- Roger be, Chairman Yub County Board ofSupervisors SUPERVISORS Andy Vasquez - District I • John Nicoletti - District 2 • Mary Jane Griego - District 3 • Roger Abe - District 4 • Hal Stocker - District 5 ------ - ----
F4 Page 6
"Students are not readily made aware when a menu item is no longer available. " • Response to Finding 4: Disagree in Part It is true that students may not know whether a particular food item is available the instant they stand in line. However, as noted in the Report (even with 12 students in line), a student receives his or her lunch and leaves the window within four (4) minutes. With a shorter line, obviously the wait time would be shorter. Further, as also pointed out in the Report: (1) even if an item does run out, additional choices are available; (2) it is inevitable that some menu items run out each day, particularly if well-liked; and (3) all menu items would not be depleted on the same day.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Page 7
"The Grand Jury recommends that the school principal and Food Services Manager internally address the potential for early suspens ion ofservices. " • Response to· Recommendation 4: Already Implemented Prior to Grand Jury's Review As noted above, and in the Report, no early suspension of service has occurred. Reliable and predictable food service as observed by the Grand Jury is a direct result of the District's consistent implementation and oversight of established food service procedures. Specifically, at each school site, including MHS, written schedules are established for the daily preparation, commencement and cessation of food services. Further, the District has instituted a multi-level organizational structure to oversee and ensure that school site food services adhere to the established schedule as well as comply with all federal, State and District rules,· regulations and procedures. Accordingly, the potential for early suspension of services has already been addressed internally, and the District will continue with its established procedure. CONCLUSION I am appreciative that the Grand Jury took the time to review and observe food services at Marysville High School. As evidenced by the Report itself, the District is doing an exemplary job. District staff takes pride in their work, take it seriously, and will continue to strive to give students access to nutritious and enjoyable meals in a timely and orderly fashion. :J Y Jce1J ' G~dd, Dr. Superintendent cc: Food Services Manager, Marysville High School Director of Food Services, Marysville Joint Unified School District Gary Cena, Principal, Marysville High School -. z.,-Jl rc.J~ <l.. YUBA - SUTTER JUVENILE HALL MAXINE SINGER YOUTH GUIDANCE CENTER August 2, 2011 The Honorable Debra L. Givens YubaCoun~SuperiorCourt 215 5th Street, Suite 200 Marysville, CA 95901 Itt: Response to 2010-2011 Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations Dear Judge Givens: This letter, provided pursuant to California Penal Code Section 933, is the Yuba Coun~Probation Department's response to 2010/2011 Grand Jury Final Report - Findings and Recommendations concerning the annual investigation into the operation ofthe Bi-Coun~Juvenile Hall and Camp Singer Youth Guidance Center. Please accept the following response to the 2010/2011 Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations:
F5 Page 7
"Members ofthe Grand Jury observed students from Virginia School helping the custodial staffin the after-lunch clean up. " • Response to Finding 5: Agree If the Grand Jury in fact observed this, the District has no reason to disagree. To clarify, the Virginia School is. not operated by the District. While some Virginia School students are housed on the MHS campus, the school is operated by the Yuba County Office ofEducation. B. RECOMMENDATIONS:
No recommendations for this finding

Conclusions 1

Commendations 3