Stanislaus County Grand Jury • 2015-2016 • Agency Response

Case # 16-13-gj Stanislaus County Jail Facilities Inspection*

Published: June 16, 2016 4 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 3 findings

F1 Page 1
each housing unit, and in the safety and sobering cells, since camera views into cells or showers are not permitted. Response: The Respondent agrees with the finding. Currently, Stanislaus County custodial deputies do not wear body cameras either
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Page 2
installation of additional CCTV cameras in the general population units where permitted at the Public Safety Center. Response: The recommendation requires further analysis to evaluate the scope and cost associated with this recommendation. The department shall follow-up and further study this issue and a proposed timeline, if it is to be implemented later. It should be noted that the existing jail expansion projects for both AB 900-Phase II and SB 1022 include such cameras in their common areas.
F2 Page 1
in the facilities or on the street. Video recording devices are used if there is an incident or if there is a planned cell extraction. Response: The Respondent agrees with the finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Page 2
The Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department should consider equipping custodial deputies in all detention facilities with personal body cameras that are activated when inmates are in pods outside of their cells. Response: The respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. The department has not entertained the use of body cameras for any deputies assigned either to Patrol Operations or Adult Detention facilities. The need to activate such technology only during times inmates are outside of their cells, excluding showers, or in a manner to avoid audio recording of private conversations without probable cause that a crime is being committed is both tedious and cumbersome for the assigned staff. The recommendation under R1 for additional CCTV cameras effectively negates the need for personal body cameras for custodial deputies, in that video recording of common area activities is accomplished. The Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department should reconsider the current staffing
F3 Page 1
Twelve-hour shifts are difficult to fill when deputies are unexpectedly absent. Stani<u>slaus</u> RECEIVED 250 East Hackett Rd. • Modesto, CA 95358 JUN 2 9 2016 Mn (209) 525-7216 • FAX (209) 525-7106 STRIVING TO BE THE BEST www.scsdonline.com Civil Grand Jury June 16, 2016 The Honorable Marie Sovey Silveira Re: Response to Civil Grand Jury Report 16-13-GJ Response: The Respondent agrees with the finding
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Page 2
model of 12-hour shifts versus 8-hour shifts. In the alternative, consider creating part- time positions (reserve custodial deputies) to augment scheduling in the event of unanticipated absences and to serve as a resource for full-time candidates for hiring. Response: The respondent disagrees partially with the finding. The current 12-hour shift model was agreed upon through formal labor negotiations as part of an approved MOU between the Deputy Sheriff's Association (DSA) and the County. The 12-hour shift model has only been in effect since February 2015, which is a relatively brief period for analysis. Though there have been scheduling challenges associated with mandated overtime coverage, the County used language in the MOU to recently re-open discussions in an effort to address these challenges. All recruitment and hiring practices conducted by the department include the availability of positions for extra-help deputies; however, the candidate pool has, for the most part, not been interested in the extra-help positions. We June 16, 2016 The Honorable Marie Sovey Silveira Re: Response to Civil Grand Jury Report 16-13-GJ do have some filled positions working in Court Services and the facilities but the numbers are very small. Commendation: The SCCGJ would like to commend the Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department on the SCCILS program offered at the PSC. The program has been well received by both staff and inmates and has contributed to a 33% reduction in the recidivism rate for those inmates that have completed the courses. This is an excellent program that has generated positive results. Response: The department appreciates the recognition of our programs by the SCCGJ. Our dedicated program staff has worked diligently to develop a viable array or programs that are evidence-based and focused on reducing the rate of recidivism. These programs will expand substantially with the completion of our jail expansion projects under AB 900-Phase II and in particular with the SB 1022 Re-entry and alternatives to Custody Training (REACT) Center. <b>Downtown Men's Jail (CJ)</b>

Commendations 4

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.