📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Humboldt County Grand Jury • 2008-2009

38 Humboldt County’s Small Special Districts

5 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 7 findings

F1 Page 13
Employee performance evaluations in the Assessor’s Office are not being conducted according to the schedule specified by County policy.
F2 Page 13
Absence of the expectation that all employees attain appropriate computer competency, and the lack of adequate support for employees to improve their competency, contribute to declining operational efficiency in the Assessor’s Office. 10
F3 Page 14
The lack of a convenient Web-based system through which citizens can access property information and other public records through the Internet contributes to operational inefficiencies in the Assessor’s Office and to unnecessary delays in recording, processing, and providing information.
F4 Page 14
Regular management and staff meetings are not conducted in the Assessor’s Office.
F5 Page 14
There appears to be a practice of grooming a current employee in the Assessor’s Office to ultimately run for election to the Assessor position.
F6 Page 14
Twenty California counties currently combine the duties of the Assessor with those of other county offices, as permitted by Government Code. Combining offices and functions for purposes of cost and management efficiency could be a benefit to Humboldt County.
F7 Page 14
There is continuing confusion regarding the status of some properties in the County. This was previously noted in the 2006 Grand Jury Report. These unresolved issues are a source of frustration for the Assessor’s Office, for other county departments, and for property owners in Humboldt County.

Recommendations 5