📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Santa Cruz County Grand Jury
• 2023-2024
__ Agree _x_ Partially Disagree __ Disagree Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): The
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 17 findings
F1
Underfunding the road and culvert maintenance work on the 586 miles of County roads in unincorporated Santa Cruz County for more than four decades has created a backlog of deferred maintenance currently exceeding ¾ of a billion dollars which creates a hazard for residents.
Related Recommendations (2)
R1
The Grand Jury recommends that the DPW complete a public report by December 31, 2024 which shows the prioritization of culvert and drainage ditch maintenance in order to help prevent road washouts that are more costly to repair. (F1, F5)
R2
The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors increase annual funding to the DPW to improve at least one local road segment with a PCI of less than 40 as listed in the Pavement Management report, in each Supervisorial district starting December 31, 2024. (F1, F2, F7, F8, F9)
F2
Due to the large shortfall in funding, Santa Cruz County Department of Public Works adheres to the accepted practice promoted by the Federal Highway Administration and RTC of prioritizing pavement preservation over pavement restoration. Much of the public lacks awareness of this practice in the absence of a formally documented policy which impacts voter choices.
Related Recommendations (2)
R2
The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors increase annual funding to the DPW to improve at least one local road segment with a PCI of less than 40 as listed in the Pavement Management report, in each Supervisorial district starting December 31, 2024. (F1, F2, F7, F8, F9)
R8
The Grand Jury recommends that the DPW formalize its policy of abandoning pavement restoration on very poor and failed Local roads into a publicly available document in order to inform affected property owners and prospective buyers by December 31, 2024. (F2, F3, F4, F7, F9) Santa Cruz County Local Roads published June 5, 2024 16 Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury
F3
The County road maintenance strategy differs by Supervisorial District leading to inconsistent road repair expectations among districts. This lack of a coordinated strategy leaves residents frustrated and with a sense of unfair treatment.
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
The Grand Jury recommends that the DPW formalize its policy of abandoning pavement restoration on very poor and failed Local roads into a publicly available document in order to inform affected property owners and prospective buyers by December 31, 2024. (F2, F3, F4, F7, F9) Santa Cruz County Local Roads published June 5, 2024 16 Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury
F4
Storms of 2017 and 2023 caused significant road failures. Contributing factors were inadequate culvert, drainage ditch, and road surface maintenance which led to culvert failures and full road washouts leaving residents stranded or incurring significant delay.
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
The Grand Jury recommends that the DPW formalize its policy of abandoning pavement restoration on very poor and failed Local roads into a publicly available document in order to inform affected property owners and prospective buyers by December 31, 2024. (F2, F3, F4, F7, F9) Santa Cruz County Local Roads published June 5, 2024 16 Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury
F5
The County of Santa Cruz has failed to ask unincorporated County voters to increase the funding of the Special District 9D (1-3) road assessment fee since its inception in 1988, which has resulted in a drastic loss of revenue for maintaining County roads.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The Grand Jury recommends that the DPW complete a public report by December 31, 2024 which shows the prioritization of culvert and drainage ditch maintenance in order to help prevent road washouts that are more costly to repair. (F1, F5)
F6
The County of Santa Cruz has failed to perform resurfacing maintenance on many of the smaller unincorporated local roads, resulting in higher failure rates and at least a 10 times increased maintenance cost when and if those roads are resurfaced.
Related Recommendations (4)
R3
The Grand Jury recommends that the DPW supply information to LAFCO detailing expenditures in each of the three zones of CSA 9D for the years 2020-2023 by October 31, 2024. (F6, F10)
R4
The Grand Jury recommends that LAFCO issue a new County Service Area 9 Service and Sphere of Influence Review incorporating detailed data of expenditures for each 9D zone by March 15, 2025. (F6, F10)
R5
The Grand Jury recommends that the County Board of Supervisors should begin the process necessary to increase the funding in CSA 9D to an amount in line with what is needed to reduce the backlog of very poor and failed road repairs by December 31, 2024. (F6)
R6
The Grand Jury recommends that the County Board of Supervisors take steps necessary to add a consumer price index increase to CSA 9D, as allowed by law, by December 31, 2024. (F6)
F7
Santa Cruz County's neglect of unincorporated local roads for many decades has led to an average Pavement Condition Index of less than 48 (as of 2019) which is 17 points below the statewide average. With the current funding level, it is projected to be 38 in 2024, and it is further projected to drop to 33 by 2028 which will leave the County in a position to experience higher catastrophic road failures.
Related Recommendations (2)
R2
The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors increase annual funding to the DPW to improve at least one local road segment with a PCI of less than 40 as listed in the Pavement Management report, in each Supervisorial district starting December 31, 2024. (F1, F2, F7, F8, F9)
R8
The Grand Jury recommends that the DPW formalize its policy of abandoning pavement restoration on very poor and failed Local roads into a publicly available document in order to inform affected property owners and prospective buyers by December 31, 2024. (F2, F3, F4, F7, F9) Santa Cruz County Local Roads published June 5, 2024 16 Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury
F8
The County prioritizes preventive maintenance of roads in fair to good condition over road repair and reconstruction due to limited discretionary funds. As a result, many residents in local road areas will have to contend with very poor/failed roads into the foreseeable future.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors increase annual funding to the DPW to improve at least one local road segment with a PCI of less than 40 as listed in the Pavement Management report, in each Supervisorial district starting December 31, 2024. (F1, F2, F7, F8, F9)
F9
The most recent LAFCO and County reports fail to provide detailed accounting of how 9D funds are being spent. The result is that taxpayers lack the information to ensure that generated funds are being used appropriately.
Related Recommendations (2)
R2
The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors increase annual funding to the DPW to improve at least one local road segment with a PCI of less than 40 as listed in the Pavement Management report, in each Supervisorial district starting December 31, 2024. (F1, F2, F7, F8, F9)
R8
The Grand Jury recommends that the DPW formalize its policy of abandoning pavement restoration on very poor and failed Local roads into a publicly available document in order to inform affected property owners and prospective buyers by December 31, 2024. (F2, F3, F4, F7, F9) Santa Cruz County Local Roads published June 5, 2024 16 Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury
F10
Minor progress has been made in seeking and securing additional funding sources. The additional funding is far short of what is needed to maintain and repair the road network. Santa Cruz County Local Roads published June 5, 2024 2023-2024 Consolidated Final Report with Responses 15
Related Recommendations (3)
R3
The Grand Jury recommends that the DPW supply information to LAFCO detailing expenditures in each of the three zones of CSA 9D for the years 2020-2023 by October 31, 2024. (F6, F10)
R4
The Grand Jury recommends that LAFCO issue a new County Service Area 9 Service and Sphere of Influence Review incorporating detailed data of expenditures for each 9D zone by March 15, 2025. (F6, F10)
R7
The Grand Jury recommends that the County Board of Supervisors continue to prioritize a minimum of 10% of Measure K funds to repair roads in the County with a PCI of 25 or less by December 31, 2024. (F10, F11)
F11
Measure K funds go directly into the General Fund and road maintenance funding expenditures are only recommended. This may allow the funding to go to other needs.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
The Grand Jury recommends that the County Board of Supervisors continue to prioritize a minimum of 10% of Measure K funds to repair roads in the County with a PCI of 25 or less by December 31, 2024. (F10, F11)
F12
Increasing the number of programs that focus on rehabilitation, education, and restorative justice to prepare for reentry would show positive improvement to public safety and a reduction in recidivism for reentering inmates.
Related Recommendations (1)
R9
By the end of calendar year 2024, the Grand Jury recommends the Sheriff develop a comprehensive plan to increase the number of programs that steer inmates towards reentry into the community with new job skills development, education, work release and transitional programs. (F12) We Can Do Better With Our Jails! published June 11, 2024 74 Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury
F13
Jail programs like “Stepping Up” steers the mentally ill to community-based mental health care, reducing the number of mentally ill inmates in jail.
Related Recommendations (1)
R10
By the end of fiscal year 2024-2025, the Grand Jury recommends the Sheriff develop a plan to implement more Jail diversion programs (like Stepping Up) that steer the Mentally Ill away from jail and to the help they need. (F13)
F14
The current practice of reviewing inmate classification monthly is too long of an interval and may endanger inmates suffering from mentally illness.
Related Recommendations (1)
R11
By the end of calendar year 2024, the Grand Jury recommends the Sheriff change the Reclassification examination of mentally ill inmates from a monthly basis to a weekly basis to prevent misclassified inmates from suffering needlessly. (F14)
F15
The failure of Wellpath to recruit and retain adequate staff adversely impacts the overall effectiveness of the mental health services provided to inmates.
Related Recommendations (2)
R12
By the end of the calendar year 2024, the Grand Jury recommends the Sheriff conduct an analysis of the effectiveness of Wellpath in regards to all mental health services of incarcerated persons. (F15)
R13
By the end of calendar year 2024, the Grand Jury recommends the Wellpath be directed to provide round-the-clock medical and mental health care availability to the Jails. (F15) Group 3: Access to Inmate Interviews and Rehabilitation Programs
F16
The Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury was not permitted to interview inmates serving sentences at the Rountree Rehabilitation and Reentry Facility as required by the Bureau of State Community and Corrections. Speaking to some inmates about their experiences and opinions of the programs would have greatly enhanced the Jail investigation and report.
Related Recommendations (1)
R14
The Grand Jury recommends the Sheriff begin to allow the Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury interviews of inmates per Penal Code 916 including observing inmate classes and programs (F16)
F17
By not filling essential positions for months at a time, services for residents suffer harm when vacancies persist.
No recommendations for this finding
Additional Recommendations 2
These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.
-
R16-20hours a day. According to answers given by Wellpath on 02/13/2024 in a Request for Proposal - Vendor Report to the County, many staffing positions are currently vacant including:[26] ● One Mental Health Coordinator ● Two full time Mental Health Clinicians ● Three full time Registered Nurses ● Four full time Licensed Vocational Nurses Some notable numbers from the report: ● Average daily # of detox patients - 12 ● Average daily # of combined segregation inmates - 25-30 ● Percentage of inmate population on medication - 65 ● Percentage of inmate population on psych medication - 68 ● Percentage of inmate population who are Severely Mentally Ill - 12 The Grand Jury is concerned with these crisis-level numbers. The workload appears to be a problem, given the vacancies of medical and mental health staff. Reducing staffing level caseloads is not the whole answer, but it is a crucial element to the question of whether inmates with mental illness are being provided with the required level of care. We Can Do Better With Our Jails! published June 11, 2024 62 Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury A recent Santa Cruz Criminal Justice report, as well as statements by jail staff and the Health Inspector, have all expressed concerns about Wellpath‘s high turnover of staff and the fact that they only provide coverage for eighteen hours a day.[27] [31] While someone is always a call away, the overall effectiveness of mental health services by Wellpath is inadequate to the needs of inmates. This adversely affects inmates’ mental health treatment.[3] [31] While medical staff are away, the mental health needs of the inmates are in the care of correctional staff. Because they have very limited medical training it could lead to inappropriate mental health care decisions.[32] Solitary Confinement and Use of a Safety Cell ● Formerly known as Solitary confinement, “Administrative Separation” (AD-Sep) or Modified Schedule is the physical separation of an incarcerated person from the general jail population.[33] ● The Main Jail has three Safety Cells that are video monitored 24 hours a day with 15-minute visual checks by the correctional staff - not Wellpath. There are an average of 36 inmate/patients placed on suicide watch per month.[34] ● Incarcerated individuals in and out of AD-Sep are provided a minimum of three hours of exercise and seven hours of recreation time per week.[35] ● Safety Cells are used in the Main Jail if a risk assessment deems the inmate is a danger to themselves or others, is making suicidal statements, as punishment for not following the rules, or is having a mental health crisis requiring a 5150 hold while waiting to transfer to a mental health facility.[22] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] ● On February 28, 2024 there were forty-three (43) inmates on a Modified Schedule and for all of 2022, 321 were separated from the rest of the inmate population.[49] [50] Medical and Mental Health Treatment in the Jail People in the criminal legal system often have a background of trauma and poverty as well as acute health needs. One-quarter have serious mental illness, many have multiple physical health conditions, and 60% of California incarcerated people have substance use disorders.[51] Through jail tours and interviews with staff, the Grand Jury learned that the Main Jail, while not a certified mental healthcare facility, houses many mentally ill inmates. The Grand Jury reviewed two years of reports that review medical health care in the Jail. The reports are conducted annually and are from the County Public Health officer to the Sheriff’s office. The inspections were conducted by an expert with over twenty (20) years experience in reviewing and assessing Title 15 state-mandated medical conditions within county jails.[52] The inspector noted that the jails were in good compliance with regulations except for several significant deficiencies identified in this report.[37] [38] [53] [54] [55] We Can Do Better With Our Jails! published June 11, 2024 2023-2024 Consolidated Final Report with Responses 63 Among the deficiencies noted were: ● Failure to prepare Health Service Audits ● Improper use of Safety Cells ● Lack of Mental Health Services and Transfer to Treatment Facilities ● Insufficient Informed Consent ● Over-prescription of Psychotropic Medications The following sections expand on the deficiencies noted above. Health Service Audits According to Title 15 the health authority shall develop and implement a written plan for annual statistical summaries of healthcare and pharmaceutical services that are provided by the Jail.[56] Based on information from these audits, the health authority shall provide the facility administrator with an annual written report on healthcare and pharmaceutical services delivered.[53] [57] Wellpath has not prepared Health Service Audits for several years. The absence of these reports, with essential data concerning the quality of care, is an obstacle to developing steps to increase inmate safety. It also hinders efforts to improve inmate health. The Jail Quality Improvement committee needs these audits to conduct valuable data analysis for data-driven medical care improvements. Also, when all jail medical staff are involved with data gathering, they can provide input and suggestions which in turn promote good morale.[54] Ad-Sep and the Improper Use of a Safety Cell Being incarcerated, even for those in good mental health, is associated with subsequent depression and bipolar disorder and has been documented that it can worsen mental health.[58] An incarcerated person may be isolated from the rest of the inmates in their own cell, or in some cases in a Safety Cell. Generally, Ad-Sep means spending 22 to 23 hours per day in a single cell, usually about the size of an elevator, and are only required to be provided a minimum of three hours of exercise and seven hours of recreation time per week. We Can Do Better With Our Jails! published June 11, 2024 64 Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury Figure 6: A sobering cell on the left and a safety cell on the right. Photo courtesy of Ashley Keehn.[59] [60] According to The health Inspection Report citing California Title 15 section 1209 regulations governing jails, as well as the Sheriff’s own policies and procedures state, “in no case shall the safety cell be used for punishment or as a substitute for Mental Health treatment.”[40] [61] The Grand Jury has learned through reviewing relevant reports and conducting interviews that inmates are put in Safety Cells for numerous reasons including, but not limited to: ● Breaking the rules[41] [43] ● Threatening to hurt themselves and others[38] [41] [62] ● Having a Mental Health Crisis[41] Documented evidence provided to the Grand Jury revealed that inmates were held in Safety Cells for days.[37] [38] [39] [39] [40] Do we really think it makes sense to lock so many people alone in tiny cells for 23 hours a day, sometimes for months or even years at a time? That is not going to make us safer. That’s not going to make us stronger. And if those individuals are ultimately released, how are they ever going to adapt? It’s not smart. Barack Obama, 2015[63] The number 5150 is the section of the California Welfare and Institutions Code that evaluates adults who are deemed to be a danger to others, himself or herself, or are gravely disabled. A 5150 hold allows an adult to be involuntarily detained for 72 hours in We Can Do Better With Our Jails! published June 11, 2024 2023-2024 Consolidated Final Report with Responses 65 a psychiatric hospital or clinic.[36] Santa Cruz has one (1) psychiatric clinic. Patients do not have to be treated in a psychiatric hospital, a clinic is sufficient. They also could be treated at the Emergency department at Dominican until transferred to an LPS facility. To meet a 5150 hold criteria in the jail, the inmate must display suicidal thoughts as determined by a jail medical provider or, absent that, by the correctional officer in charge. However, it has been the practice in our jails to only initiate a 5150 hold immediately prior to release from the jail. Once a 5150 hold is issued you must transfer the inmate to a mental health facility for care. Waiting until discharge to initiate a 5150 hold means inmates may be held in Safety Cells for long periods of time. Use of a 5150 hold by the Sheriff's office numbered more than twenty-six (26) per month in 2022 and there were 321 such holds in 2022, according to the Sheriff’s statistics.[50] In the report, the Health Inspector’s main concern was the use of Safety Cells, and they spoke directly to the mental health professional in charge to determine if correct Title 15 procedures were being followed. According to the report, medical and jail staff were not using correct procedures.[64] This deficiency is closely related to the misuse of giving required mental health care services. It also is related to the proper procedures for transferring inmates to a mental health facility. Mental health care is provided in what are called LPS treatment facilities and are explained below.[44] To read more Safety Cell information see
-
R81-29to make the prevention of rape and domestic violence one of its highest priorities. In 2023, the Santa Cruz City Council adopted a Five Year Strategic Plan. The Plan makes no mention of rape and domestic violence. Over the past decade, the City’s Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women has failed to provide the City Council with solid Annual Reports that document City, community, and police efforts to prevent rape and domestic violence. Recent reports have either included no data or limited data. The 2023 CPVAW Joint Report has no metrics on important trends such as whether the City of Santa Cruz still has a higher than average rate of rapes by strangers. What areas of the city were the crimes committed in? Have there been arrests? Long-standing Commission programs such as the Safe Place Network of local businesses are currently idle. This year the Santa Cruz City Schools District canceled the Commission’s popular self-defense classes for middle and high school students. The in-person classes are being replaced with an online self-esteem video. The City has ended the Commission’s thirty five-year access to redacted police reports of rape and domestic violence. These reports enabled the Commission to evaluate police response, respond to complaints and recommend training if needed. The Grand Jury submits its findings and recommendations to bring the City of Santa Cruz into compliance with City Ordinance 81-29. The personal safety and well-being of the community is at stake. Preventing Rape and Domestic Violence published June 27, 2024 408 Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury Table of Contents Summary 1 Table of Contents 2 Background 3 Scope and Methodology 3 Investigation 4 History Of Commission Work 4 Decline in Report Quality and Frequency 5 Metrics On Reported Rape in the City 6 Commission Programs and Resources 8 Self-Defense 9 Cuts to Self-Defense 9 Safe Place Network 10 Bar Coasters 11 Banners 12 Measuring the City’s Support 13 Not In the City Five Year Strategic Plan 13 Decline In Dedicated Staffing 13 Ongoing Budget Reductions 14 Loss Of Visible Location 14 Frequency Of Meetings 15 SCPD And The Commission 15 High Incidence of Stranger Rape 15 Defining Rape 16 FBI And Revised Rape Definition 17 SCPD, CPVAW and the Definition of Rape 17 Commission Access to Redacted Police Reports on Rape 20 Conclusion 20 Findings 21 Recommendations 21 Required Responses 22 Invited Responses 23 Definitions 23 Sources 23 References 23