⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 5 findings
F1
The policy in which law enforcement agencies do not honor “hostage for trade” events was not explained to the jurors before the jail tour. The hostage policy was explained after the jurors were inside the facility and therefore unable to exercise their decision to not enter the facility and assume the risk.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The Grand Jury recommends Jail personnel responsible for tours and inspections should alert participants of the “no hostage policy” well in advance of entering the jail. Include the “no hostage policy” in the Grand Jury Summary provided at the beginning of the tour. (F1)
F2
In several instances, inmates expressed appreciation for respectful treatment by jail staff, which the Grand Jury believes is an important aspect of helping in rehabilitation efforts.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The Grand Jury recommends continued compassionate and respectful treatment of inmates as warranted. (F2)
F3
An impressive number of quality programs are available to inmates. 49
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The Grand Jury recommends continued and expanded jail programs in the new jail. (F3)
F4
The women’s shower stall area shows signs of excessive duress, damage due to wear. Mildew is prevalent in certain areas.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The Grand Jury recommends facility personnel take appropriate measures to stop the progress of mildew in women’s shower areas. (F4)
F5
Electrical panels and damaged plumbing in the ground floor corridor present severe safety elements in dire need of attention.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The Grand Jury recommends replacing electrical panels or installing a waterproof wall separating the plumbing from the electrical. (F5)