Trinity County Grand Jury
• 2011-2012
• Agency Response
Response to:
2011 to 2012 Grand Jury Final Report
Trinity County Detention Facility: Disaster Pending!*
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 6 findings
F1
The 8/15/11 response to the 2010-2011 Grand Jury Report stated, "The video system is failing and plans are underway to have it replaced in the coming weeks". Although new security cameras have been purchased (some time ago), to date they have not been installed. At the time of the tour only one of the old cameras appeared to be working. Response: I agree.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
It is imperative for the safety of the staff and inmates that the monitoring system be functional. It is the top priority for replacement. Complete the installation immediately. Response: Implementation is currently underway with an anticipated completion date of September 1, 2012.
F2
The mandates of California Bill AB109 are overloading a Jail facility that is not designed for long term housing. Due to the overcrowding the Law Enforcement Officers S:\Grand Jury\11-12\JUR2011-2012-002 CAO resp.doc are having to make a determination as to whether to arrest, or just cite an individual because "There is no room at the Inn". Response: I agree in part with this finding. The Jail was not designed to house inmates' long term. The provisions of AB109 have resulted in the sentencing of less than 4 inmates thus far. Additionally, AB109 provides that all inmates now receive 1/2 time credit instead of 1/3 credit for time served in custody and new amendments allow the sheriff to release inmates early by cutting an additional 25 days from their sentence from 5 days to 30 days to address overcrowding. A great deal of the overcrowding in the Jail is a result of delays in the Court system, and lack of a fully implemented pre-trial release program.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
There are a number of maintenance and repairs that need attention. Response: I agree with this finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
In conjunction with County General Services staff, use jail trustees to perform required maintenance. For example, but not limited to, holes in the walls, weed control and security cameras. Response: Will be implemented as manpower and financial resources allow.
F4
Female staffing continues to be inadequate. Gender specific positions can be advertised for a detention facility. Response: I agree with this finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Advertise and fill the position that is gender specific. S:\Grand Jury\11-12\JUR2011-2012-002 CAO resp.doc Response: Will be implemented to the extent that the Board of Supervisors authorizes the recruitment and upon closing of the recruitment a qualified candidate is selected and completes the pre-hiring screening processes.
F5
There is a mixing of inmates that are pre-trial, trustee, and felony offenders. Response: I agree with this finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Find alternative means to separate the classes of inmates: such as monitoring devices, work release programs, housing elsewhere. Response: Has been partially implemented. Electronic monitoring is already being done. General Services has already developed a work release program and is implementing it as time and resources allow. As indicated in response to findings 2a and 2b alternative housing requires further analysis.
F6
Lack of supervisorial personnel and funding has been the catch all excuse for many years. With the County's limited resources, management must prioritize both staffing and funding needs. Response: I disagree with this finding in part. Lack of personnel and funding is not an excuse. It is a reality in Trinity County. There have been continual on-going recruitments for law enforcement personnel. Often times we are unable to get qualified candidates out of the applicant pool. As to funding, in a County with stagnant revenues and rising costs, there will always be more need than there is funding. The Board of Supervisors has consistently funded public safety at a higher level than any other County service. Additionally, substantial funds have been expended in the past two fiscal years on maintenance, repairs, and equipment replacement at the jail.
No recommendations for this finding
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.