📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Trinity County Grand Jury • 1998-1999

Complaint on Hayfork Fire Protection District

View PDF View Full Original

Findings 2 findings

F1 Page 8
The Grand Jury compliments the Auditor’s office for their willingness to provide timely help and assistance to the Special Districts of Trinity County. However, bud- get information provided to the Special Districts by the Auditor’s office is not always clear and easily understood by people not famil- iar with accounting language.
F2 Page 8
The Grand Jury finds that the process the Special Dis- tricts must use to expand their districts can be compli- cated, lengthy and not easily understood. However, the Grand Jury finds that the Auditor’s office, Planning Department and LAFCO all did the best they could to explain the process and help the HFPD determine whether or not they should go ahead with annexation. The amount of money refunded to the HFPD from the annexation fee appears to be proper due to the amount of time expended by LAFCO on the annexation pro- cess. Because of the current method of distributing General Fund revenue, there is no method by which Special Dis- tricts can increase their share of the General Fund rev- enue through annexation. The only way for the HFPD to obtain a reliable, consistent and permanent increase in revenue at this time would be to hold an election in the affected areas to gain voter approval for a special tax district.

Recommendations 2