Orange County Grand Jury • 2008-2009

Let The Sheriff Do Her Job Summary County of Orange, unlike any of written statements of both policy

Published: February 15, 2009 2 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 1 findings

F1
The California Penal matter to be prepared for dis- Sheriff-Coroner. Code gives the Sheriff the cussion by the officer or head power to establish both a of the agency or department Required Responses policy and an application being investigated or reviewed, process for the issuance of The California Penal Code including the governing body concealed weapons per- specifies the required permis- of the public agency when ap- mits/licenses. This includes sible responses to the findings and plicable. This timeframe shall the power to revoke prior recommendations contained in the not exceed six months from the licenses/permits not issued report. The specific sections are date of publication of the grand in conformity with the code. quoted below: jury report. §933.05 The recommendation will not be Response to Finding 1 is 1. For purposes of Subdivision implemented because it is not war- required from the Board of Su- (b) of Section 933, as to each grand ranted or is not reasonable, with an pervisors and the Orange County jury finding, the responding person explanation therefore. Sheriff-Coroner.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Allow the Sheriff to (b) of Section 933, as to each grand ing the issuance of CCW permits jury recommendation, the respond- continue her legally permis- is a waste of county resources and ing person or entity shall report one sible actions in establish- these efforts could be redirected of the following actions: ing a CCW license permit toward more vital issues facing the policy and the adherence (1) The recommendation has citizens of Orange County. to an application process. been implemented, with a This includes the possible summary regarding the imple- Findings revocation of permits issued mented action. In accordance with Califor- by the prior Sheriff and the (2) The recommendation has nia Penal Code Sections 933 and review of each applicant to not yet been implemented, but 933.05, each finding will be re- insure compliance with the will be implemented in the sponded to by the government mandates of the penal code future, with a timeframe for entity to which it is addressed. The as to "good cause", training, implementation. responses are to be submitted to good moral character and (3) The recommendation re- the Presiding Judge of the Supe- residency. quires further analysis, with an rior Court. The 2008-2009 Orange explanation and the scope and

Additional Recommendations 1

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.