Mendocino County Grand Jury • 2005-2006 • Agency Response

County of Mendocino Post Office Box 629

Published: June 01, 2006 15 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 17 findings

F1
The Board of Supervisors (BOS) must approve any negotiated new or increased pension benefits. Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board of Supervisors agrees with this finding. Response (Interim CEO): The Interim Chief Executive Officer agrees with this finding. Response (Auditor/Controller): The Auditor-Controller agrees with this finding. Response (Treasurer/Tax-Collector): The Treasurer – Tax Collector agrees with this finding. Response (Employee Retirement Association): The Retirement Association agrees with this finding.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
While the BOS has sought input from actuaries in making pension benefit decisions, the BOS has not always consulted with County financial officials before approving new plans. Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board of Supervisors agrees with this finding in that the Board has not always consulted with County financial officials before approving new “benefits”. Response (Interim CEO): The Interim Chief Executive Officer agrees with this finding in that the Board has not always consulted with County financial officials before approving new “benefits Response (Auditor/Controller): The Auditor-Controller agrees with the finding that county financial officials were not always consulted by Administration or the BOS before approving benefit changes. Response (Treasurer/Tax-Collector): The Treasurer - Tax Collector agrees with the finding, with the provision that the finding should state the BOS has not always consulted with County financial officials before approving new “benefits” (not plans). The plan is according to -2—6 1937 Act Retirement Laws, which has not changed since inception, however the relative benefits have changed over the years. Response (Employee Retirement Association): The Retirement Association agrees with this finding.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
The decision by the BOS to retroactively, and without employee buy-in cost, reclassify Safety employees so as to give them higher-level benefit rates resulted in higher pension obligations. Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board of Supervisors agrees with this finding. Response (Interim CEO): The Interim Chief Executive Officer agrees with this finding. Response (Auditor/Controller): The Auditor-Controller agrees with this finding. Response (Treasurer/Tax-Collector): The Treasurer – Tax Collector agrees with this finding. Response (Employee Retirement Association): The Retirement Association agrees with this finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
the BOS include Department heads responsible for the financial health of the County in its
F4
The decision in 1998 by the BOS to no longer fund post-retirement health insurance benefits for future hires resulted in a reduction of County liability. Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board of Supervisors agrees with this finding. Response (Interim CEO): The Interim Chief Executive Officer agrees with this finding. Response (Auditor/Controller): The Auditor-Controller agrees with this finding. Response (Treasurer/Tax-Collector): The Treasurer – Tax Collector agrees with this finding. Response (Employee Retirement Association): The Retirement Association agrees with this finding.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Disability retirement payouts begin immediately upon determination and are significantly higher than regular retirement benefits. Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board of Supervisors agrees with this finding. Response (Interim CEO): The Interim Chief Executive Officer agrees with this finding. Response (Auditor/Controller): The Auditor-Controller agrees with this finding. Response (Treasurer/Tax-Collector): The Treasurer – Tax Collector agrees with this finding. Response (Employee Retirement Association): The Retirement Association agrees with this finding. Response (Human Resources): The Human Resources Department can neither agree nor disagree with this finding due to the fact that this department has no direct knowledge of the Retirement System payouts.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Disability retirements have been increasing in the last 10 years. Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board of Supervisors agrees with this finding. Response (Interim CEO): The Interim Chief Executive Officer agrees with this finding. Response (Auditor/Controller): The Auditor-Controller agrees with this finding. Response (Treasurer/Tax-Collector): The Treasurer – Tax Collector agrees with this finding. Response (Employee Retirement Association): The Retirement Association agrees with this finding. -2—6 Response (Human Resources): The Human Resources Department can neither agree nor disagree with this finding due to the fact that this department has no direct knowledge of the Retirement System and disability retirements.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
County financial officials have estimated that the total debt for retirement has peaked and should soon show a steady reduction. Their estimate is that, when the current POB is fully paid in 2026, the MCERA funding level will be at what the County believes to be a fiscally responsible level, that is, at 90% of Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL), meaning that 10% falls into the category of Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL). Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board of Supervisors agrees with this finding. Please see the responses provided by the Auditor/Controller. Response (Interim CEO): The Interim Chief Executive Officer agrees with this finding. Please see the response provided by the Auditor Controller. Response (Auditor/Controller): The Auditor-Controller agrees with this finding noting that the 90% funding threshold estimate is presently a mandated requirement within the provisions of our existing pension obligation bond issue. As such, there is every expectation that the UAAL will be under the 10% threshold when the obligation is paid off in 2026. Response (Treasurer/Tax-Collector): The Treasurer – Tax Collector agrees with this finding, with the exception that the county financial officials estimate that the funding level will be 90% or higher. Response (Employee Retirement Association): The Retirement Association agrees with this finding, with the exception that the county financial officials estimate that the funding level will be 90% or higher.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
The total County financial picture regarding retirement benefit funding and debt can only be gained by reviewing the reports from both MCERA and the County budget. Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board of Supervisors agrees with this finding. Response (Interim CEO): The Interim Chief Executive Officer agrees with this finding. Response (Auditor/Controller): The Auditor-Controller agrees with this finding. Response (Treasurer/Tax-Collector): The Treasurer – Tax Collector agrees with this finding. Response (Employee Retirement Association): The Retirement Association agrees with this finding.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
The AAL for pensions is affected by the value of promised benefits to employees. County Administration and labor representatives negotiate periodically these promised benefits. Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board of Supervisors agrees with this finding. Response (Interim CEO): The Interim Chief Executive Officer agrees with this finding. Response (Auditor/Controller): The Auditor-Controller agrees with this finding. Response (Treasurer/Tax-Collector): The Treasurer – Tax Collector agrees with this finding. Response (Employee Retirement Association): The Retirement Association agrees with this finding.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
The pension fund assets are invested by MCERA until they are needed for a pension payout to retirees. -2—6 Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board of Supervisors agrees with this finding. Please see the response provided by the Treasurer/Tax Collector. Response (Interim CEO): The Interim Chief Executive Officer agrees with this finding. Please see the response provided by the Treasurer/Tax Collector. Response (Auditor/Controller): The Auditor-Controller agrees with this finding. Response (Treasurer/Tax-Collector): The Treasurer – Tax Collector agrees with this finding. However, since MCERA has positive cash flows from both contributions and interest earnings there has not been a need to sell any investments to make pension payouts to retirees. Response (Employee Retirement Association): The Retirement Association agrees with this finding. However, since MCERA has positive cash flows from both contributions and interest earnings there has not been a need to sell any investments to make pension payouts to retirees.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
The County’s contribution to MCERA for 2004-2005 was approximately $9,197,000. The employees’ contribution for this year was approximately $5,622,000.1 As of June 30, 2005 there were 1,333 active and 394 inactive employees in-rolled in the County's pension plan.2 Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board of Supervisors disagrees with this finding. Please see the response provided by the Treasurer/Tax Collector. Response (Interim CEO): The Interim Chief Executive Officer disagrees with this finding. Please see the response provided by the Treasurer/Tax Collector. Response (Auditor/Controller): The Auditor-Controller is unable to verify the accuracy of this finding because the data in our possession is not readily available to make the determination at this time. Please refer to records held by MCERA for validation of this finding. Response (Treasurer/Tax-Collector): The Treasurer – Tax Collector disagrees with this finding. The table referenced above shows the contributions that would be generated under the different scenarios presented. The $9,197,000 is the amount that would be generated from total county payroll if the county were paying the total normal costs to the system and also paying the full amount needed to amortize the UAAL over the remaining amortization period. The actual County contribution for 2004/2005 was $6,455,526 and employee contribution was $6,601,349. Response (Employee Retirement Association): The Retirement Association disagrees with this finding. The table referenced above shows the contributions that would be generated under the different scenarios presented. The $9,197,000 is the amount that would be generated from total county payroll if the county were paying the total normal costs to the system and also paying the full amount needed to amortize the UAAL over the remaining amortization period. The actual County contribution for 2004/2005 was $6,455,526 and employee contribution was $6,601,349 1 Mendocino County Employees' Retirement Association - Report on the Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2005 2 Mendocino County Employees' Retirement Association - June 30, 2005 Experience Study Report, Pages 3 and 4. -2—6 Response (Human Resources): The Human Resources Department can neither agree nor disagree with this finding due to the fact that this department has no direct knowledge of the Retirement System contributions.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
The UAAL has not been recognized as a debt, so it is not included in any of the actual debt service payments made by the County. Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board of Supervisors agrees with this finding. Response (Interim CEO): The Interim Chief Executive Officer agrees with this finding. Response (Auditor/Controller): The Auditor-Controller agrees with this finding. Response (Treasurer/Tax-Collector): The Treasurer – Tax Collector agrees with this finding. Response (Employee Retirement Association): The Retirement Association agrees with this finding.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
County obligations for retirement funding is the sum of the unpaid POB balance by the County plus MCERA’s UAAL, as reported each year. (See Appendix C, Chart 1). Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board of Supervisors agrees with this finding. Response (Interim CEO): The Interim Chief Executive Officer agrees with this finding. Response (Auditor/Controller): The Auditor-Controller agrees with this finding. Response (Treasurer/Tax-Collector): The Treasurer – Tax Collector agrees with this finding. Response (Employee Retirement Association): The Retirement Association agrees with this finding.
No recommendations for this finding
F14
As of 2005, the remaining debt owed to investors of the POB is approximately $99,930,000.3 Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board of Supervisors agrees with this finding. Response (Interim CEO): The Interim Chief Executive Officer agrees with this finding. Response (Auditor/Controller): The Auditor-Controller agrees with this finding. Response (Treasurer/Tax-Collector): The Treasurer – Tax Collector agrees with this finding. Response (Employee Retirement Association): The Retirement Association agrees with this finding.
No recommendations for this finding
F15
The Pension Trust Fund statements reflect total assets of $288,238,797 as of June 30, 2005.4 Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board of Supervisors agrees with this finding. Response (Interim CEO): The Interim Chief Executive Officer agrees with this finding. Response (Auditor/Controller): The Auditor-Controller agrees with this finding. Response (Treasurer/Tax-Collector): The Treasurer – Tax Collector agrees with this finding. Response (Employee Retirement Association): The Retirement Association agrees with this finding. County of Mendocino Audit Report -- June 30, 2005, http://www.co.mendocino.ca.us/auditor/pdf/05%20Mendocino%20GASB34%20afs%20-%20FINAL%2019Apr06.pdf 4 County of Mendocino Audit Report -- June 30, 2005, http://www.co.mendocino.ca.us/auditor/pdf/05%20Mendocino%20GASB34%20afs%20-%20FINAL%2019Apr06. -2—6
No recommendations for this finding
F16
As of June 30, 2005, there were 809 retirees with an annual pension allocation of $12,013,000. This averages $14,849 per individual per year.5 Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board of Supervisors agrees with this finding. Please see the response provided by the Treasurer/Tax Collector. Response (Interim CEO): The Interim Chief Executive Officer agrees with this finding. Please see the response provided by the Treasurer/Tax Collector. Response (Auditor/Controller): We are unable to verify the accuracy of this finding based upon the information currently in our possession. Response (Treasurer/Tax-Collector): The Treasurer – Tax Collector agrees with this finding. (Reference should be to of the experience study report.) Response (Employee Retirement Association): The Retirement Association agrees with this finding. (Reference should be to of the experience study report.) Response (Human Resources): The Human Resources Department can neither agree nor disagree with this finding due to the fact that this department has no direct knowledge of the Retirement System annual pension allocations.
No recommendations for this finding
F17
Retirement-related outlays (pensions, health insurance, POB interest and principal) make up approximately 10 % of the County's annual budget. Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board of Supervisors disagrees in part with this finding. Please see the response provided by the Auditor/Controller. Response (Interim CEO): The Interim Chief Executive Officer disagrees with this finding. Please see the response provided by the Auditor/Controller. Response (Auditor/Controller): The Auditor-Controller does not agree with this finding. For fiscal year 2004-05, retirement-related outlays made up approximately 7% of the County’s actual costs. Response (Treasurer/Tax-Collector): The Treasurer – Tax Collector agrees with this finding. Response (Employee Retirement Association): The Retirement Association agrees with this finding. Response (Human Resources): The Human Resources Department can neither agree nor disagree with this finding due to the fact that this department has no direct knowledge of the percentage of retirement-related outlays as it pertains to the County’s total budget.
No recommendations for this finding

Comments 1