📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Los Angeles County Grand Jury • 2009-2010

Drug Free Work Environment

9 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 7 findings

F1 Page 46
The Auditor-Controller does not have a policy/procedural manual outlining the process of receiving calls and cataloging key statistical records
F2
There is no special emphasis on reporting drug/alcohol abuse
F3 Page 46
The availability of this public 800 number hotline resource is not well known
F4 Page 51
To improve the quality of laboratory services provided to the criminal justice system
F5 Page 51
To offer the general public and users of laboratory services a national standard and means of identifying laboratory facilities that satisfy accreditation criteria
F6 Page 51
To develop and maintain criteria which can be used by a laboratory to assess its level of performance and strengthen the operation 2009-2010 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT 39
F7 Page 52
To provide an independent, impartial, and objective system by which laboratory facilities can benefit from a total organization review In 2005, examiners assigned to the Manual Comparison Detail were involved in erroneous identification of evidence in two separate cases. This error resulted in false arrest in each case. The incidents were investigated and revealed a lack of supervisory oversight which may have contributed to the errors. The current ratio of supervisor to employees is 1:14. The industry standards show that an efficient supervisor to employee ratio is 1:8.

Recommendations 7