Tuolumne County Grand Jury • 2010-2011

2011 Grand Jury Report - Part II

Published: June 16, 2011 80 pages
View Original PDF

Findings 13 findings

F1
Combining all existing Tuolumne County fire districts and departments under a single management structure would address the following: (a) Improvement must be made in the use of currently available funding. Having a paid staff-member of Fire Chief status in multiple districts and departments is increasing costs unnecessarily. (b) Training and equipment is not consistent among districts and departments. (c) An inventory of County-wide resources, both human and equipment, would be a useful tool in addressing how to provide economical and efficient use of what is available. (d) Parochial attitudes are a barrier to change. Making sure future 10 Interviews 11 CAL Fire Contract 12 Interviews 84 purchases of equipment and training of staff are compatible throughout the system will result in an emergency response capability and potential cost savings beneficial to everyone in the County, not just within a single district. Maintaining the integrity of current benefit assessments so that local taxpayers continue to receive what they voted to gain will be challenging to any proposal combining County-wide resources. (e) Renewal or renegotiation of the CAL Fire Contract must be done with flexibility in mind and with careful attention to administrative cost reduction.
F2
The public’s perception of emergency response is outdated. Actual fire related calls are a small portion of demand. The shift from firefighting to medical response is a large part of increased costs. New funding sources are required to meet the increasing demands for emergency response. Since most of this demand is likely to be in medical response, emphasis must be on how to address these expenses.
F3
Emergency dispatch is complicated. Centralization is needed now. The current dispatching system results in multiple actions necessary to send a response, (Appendix A), as well as errors in dispatching needed resources to the proper location. California Highway Patrol is the only available dispatch for 911 calls made from cellular phones.
F4
It is essential to educate the public about how their demand for services relates to cost. The public’s expectation of service must be defined. What it costs to provide those services must be explained. Funding methods can then be established to provide that level of service.
F5
Volunteer numbers are declining due to several factors. An aging population, the demands on today’s working families and discouragement from some professional firefighters are lesser issues. Training requirements appear to be the main obstacle to recruitment. Lack of opportunity to engage in actual fire fighting appears to be the primary obstacle to retaining volunteers because medical response is usually not their focus. Attrition will always be a factor. It is necessary that recruitment efforts remain constant.
F6
Some volunteer fire stations have a low response rate or are inactive. These stations mislead residents regarding safety-response times and may affect ISO ratings.
F7
The “Amador” Plan allows CAL Fire resources to be used for local structural fire protection during the non-fire season winter months.
F8
Groveland Community Service District provides response outside its district’s boundaries to Mariposa County. Mariposa County assists Groveland when necessary. This cooperation is essential to isolated and remote residents. It has 22 volunteers, successfully uses part-time employees, supports a ROP fire cadet program and has community appreciation activities.
F9
Any centralization of responders will offer savings in some areas and increase costs in others. For some positions, personnel costs are likely to increase as 85 “equal pay for equal work” will be a factor. There are many undefined benefits CAL Fire provides in services and equipment that must be included in a cost analysis. The success of methods to save on maintenance, purchasing and other budget items will vary.
F10
Consolidating into a Community Service District addresses several of the problems of special districts.
F11
Lack of effective personnel management by the TCSD board resulted in lawsuits and grievances which cost the district untold time and money in legal fees and settlements. These issues detrimentally affected the district’s 21 Failure to promulgate the signed Settlement Agreement: Brown Act Govt. Code 140 operating efficiency. Conflict-of-interest regulations appear to have been disregarded when dealing with personnel issues. Complex employee protection regulations demand expertise in personnel management.
F12
Payment to settle a Claim that protested awarding the treatment plant construction contract to other than the lowest responsible bidder increased costs. Customers of TCSD must bear part of the costs of settlement but gain no improvement in services for those dollars.
F13
A Community Services District combining existing special districts serving Tuolumne City could provide a general manager and address the problem of maintaining a full roster of board members.

Recommendations 13