Placer County Grand Jury
• 2000-2001
Mid-placer Public Schools Transportation Agency Transportation of Special Needs Children
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 9 findings
F1
The Agency has minimized the use of outside contractors for Special Needs transportation. Although not totally eliminated, they have reduced outside contracting by a large margin. Last year approximately 40 to 50 students were transported by outside contractors. As of February 2002 the Agency has five students on MediCab. As personnel becomes available, that number should drop. Reducing cab services was accomplished through more personnel, better routing, and utilizing three new vans that meet Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards safety regulations for school buses. Mid-Placer has formal written contracts with each contractor. Employees of these companies go through Mid-Placer pre-employment requirements of drug testing and fingerprinting. The recommendations of Finding 1 have been implemented.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
The Agency maintains the policy of background checks through the Department of Justice “Live Scan” fingerprinting before any employee transports students. (The California Education Code §45125.1 was amended by the Montoya Law and is included in these background checks.) The recommendations of Finding 2 have been implemented.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Mid-Placer Board maintains that it fully complies with all established policies and state law concerning the transportation of special needs children. The board appears to be active in providing direction and oversight. The recommendations of Finding 3 have been implemented.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Accountability for Special Needs Students is in effect. New emergency forms were developed for students’ families and schools to fill out so that MPPSTA has the latest up-to-date information on each student. Emergency forms are kept in three different areas: a master file in the office, the route books for substitute drivers, and on the bus with the regular driver. These forms are updated as changes occur. The recommendations of Finding 4 have been implemented.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
PCOE is highly involved in the Agency and is fully represented on the governing board. PCOE is proactive with the Agency by providing training for employees, including but not limited to CPR and training of related student services such as aides trained in mental health. Aides on buses that transport the emotionally disturbed are decreasing instances of disruption. The Agency is getting positive feedback from families of Special Needs students. The recommendations of Finding 5 have been implemented.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Regarding the complaint procedure that showed Mid-Placer was failing to respond in a timely manner to complaints by teachers and parents, the board adopted a more proactive Uniform Complaint Procedure, Board Policy #2080. This current procedure closely aligns itself with several California school districts and allows the complaint to be resolved at the lowest possible level or be escalated to the State level if necessary. Mid-Placer management has developed a new method of monitoring and tracking complaints. Incidents are logged electronically in the PCOE office and are immediately dispersed to the Mid-Placer office. The reports are saved on the computer with ‘hard copies’ also making it easy to track each complaint from receipt to resolution. Concerns called into the agency are to be returned within one business day or sooner whether or not the issue has been solved. Complaints received by PCOE have dropped from a high of nearly 400 in 1999- 2000 to just over 50 in 2000-2001. The recommendations of Finding 6 have been implemented.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
Possibly for the first time in a long time the Agency has more drivers than routes. Although the Agency is reporting more drivers than routes it does face the issue of a 5% to 15% daily absenteeism rate and a need to cover routes for requested field trips. MPPSTA still is in need of more qualified drivers. Mid-Placer will continue to maintain an aggressive campaign to recruit and train more drivers. In the past year drivers have negotiated an increase of 3.17% and have a tentative agreement for another 3% on the salary schedule. Drivers are now being paid $10.75 to $13.06 per hour. Recruiting, training and hiring are top priority. Strategies for gaining new hires include job fairs, local college contacts, direct mailers, word of mouth, and local newspaper ads. The recommendations of Finding 7 have been implemented.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Radio equipment has been updated to meet the needs of communications between the school buses and the dispatch office. Two handheld radios for supervisors have been added for times when they are called out on emergencies. Also a new repeater system has been installed with an antenna mounted on a higher hilltop so that the area of coverage is expanded. New digital radios have been installed and programmed in the buses. A communications vendor makes certain all of the equipment is functioning well. The recommendations of Finding 8 have been implemented.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
All relevant information, including IEP protocols, is current and available for internal or external drivers. The information does not breach confidentiality but is adequate to ensure the safety of the special needs children. The recommendations of Finding 9 have been implemented. Commendation New management for the Mid-Placer Transportation Agency implemented and exceeded the recommendations of the prior Grand Jury. No further oversight is necessary by the succeeding Grand Jury. No response is required.
No recommendations for this finding
Commendations 1
-
CM1New management for the Mid-Placer Transportation Agency implemented and exceeded the recommendations of the prior Grand Jury. No further oversight is necessary by the succeeding Grand Jury. No response is required. 2001-2001 Placer County Grand Jury Final Reports 36