📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Placer County Grand Jury
• 2014-2015
Placer County Grand Jury Review of Placer County Government and Special District/Agency Websites June 26, 2015 City of
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 13 findings
F1
The websites provide a large variety of information, making many documents readily available to the public without necessitating a CPRA request or physical visit. This information includes data such as: locations services business hours governance fees taxes licenses annual financial reports and other governmental or special agency procedures.
F2
Due to the lack of consistency between websites, locating similar information on different websites is time consuming and exasperating.
F3
The inclusion of outdated information on the website, besides being of limited value, clutters the website and calls into question other postings on the website. An example is that one website includes labor force statistics and economic reports from 2006.
F4
The lack of document information, including posting dates and sunset dates, decreases confidence in the validity of data found on the websites.
F5
Some meeting minutes are not being posted in a timely manner.
F6
It is generally more difficult to distinguish the minutes when they are embedded in agendas or in videos, rather than posted separately.
F7
Posting of summarized minutes (abstracts), or a summary of actions taken, would improve the public’s experience in trying to understand what governance actions were taken, or what decisions were made or deferred.
F8
Video recordings of proceedings are beneficial to the public’s understanding of their representatives actions in council and board meetings.
F9
The ability to locate current financial results is improved when financial performance reports are directly posted on the website.
F10
Lack of consistency in posting of bid opportunities and awards on websites makes it difficult for the public to discern available contracting opportunities and what awards have been approved.
F11
The public’s access to operating policies, applying to elected officials and employees, would be enhanced if these documents were available through the website.
F12
A link on the website to fill out CPRA document requests improves the public’s ability to submit requests.
F13
A link to the Grand Jury website where the Grand Jury complaint form “Confidential Citizen Complaint” is available enables public access for registering a confidential complaint on line.
Recommendations 11
-
R1A website best-practices guide be considered for development in the next 12 months by representatives from Placer County and the Cities of Auburn, Colfax, Lincoln, Rocklin, Roseville and the town of Loomis.
-
R2All Special Districts/Agencies should assure that their websites, at a minimum, meet the best- practices checklist from the Special District Leadership Foundation.
-
R3All website information should be subject to annual reviews to ensure information is still pertinent.
-
R4All documents have a posting and sunset (required removal) date that triggers an automatic archiving of the document.
-
R5All city and special districts webpages should include current written minutes, which include a summary of actions taken and decisions made.
-
R6Posting of complete video recordings of meetings should be investigated to determine if it is economically feasible.
-
R7All websites should include direct links to financial reports, including on-going progress and performance reports on financial results versus budgets.
-
R8Placer County, City of Auburn, City of Colfax, and all special district/agency websites should include access to the policy, process, and posting of current contracting opportunities. Results of bid awards should also be posted.
-
R9Current operating policies covering travel and use of entity owned assets, including vehicles, cell phones, computers, and credit cards should be available on websites or by online CPRA requests.
-
R10Placer County, Auburn and Colfax, along with all special districts, should incorporate into their websites a link to make CPRA Public Records Requests.
-
R11Websites should include a link to the Grand Jury website where the public can access the Grand Jury complaint form“Confidential Citizen Complaint”. Tables 3 and 4 on the following pages specify which recommendations are applicable to each surveyed entity. Attachment A demonstrates the linkages between the multiple facts, findings and recommendations in this report. Table 3 – Recommendations for County, Cities and Towns Recommendations