Monterey County Grand Jury • 2017-2018 • Agency Response
Response to: Law Enforcement Training Opportunities on the Former Fort Ord

College August 1, 2018 The Honorable Stephanie E. Hulsey Judge of the Superior Court County of Monterey*

Published: August 01, 2018 6 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 13 findings

F1
Large tracts of land are needed for developing the proposed law enforcement training applications, especially for constructing a full-scale EVOC and a firing range. Response: The Board of Trustees agrees with the finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The MPC Board of Trustees should determine whether or not they want to move ahead with the MOUT project. Response: This recommendation has not yet been implemented, but MPC Board of Trustees approval will be completed by October 31, 2018. Each year, the District is required to submit its 5 Year Construction Plan to the California Community College Chancellor's Office, which indicates the capital facilities projects the District intends to build. The deadline is usually July 1; however, an update to the state facilities database system, known as FUSION, has moved this year's due date to fall 2018 (the exact date is still being determined). One of the projects in the District's 5 Year Plan is the Fort Ord Public Safety - Phase II project, which includes the MOUT project as a component. The Fort Ord Public Safety - Phase II project is currently approved by the state Chancellor's Office for a 50% state funding match and before MPC can proceed, the state must issue bonds to fund the state portion. The MPC Board of Trustees will consider approval of the 5 Year Construction Plan, including the Fort Ord Public Safety - Phase II project,
F2
The 535 acres being transferred to MPC should be sufficient land to complete the proposed public safety training facilities. Response: The Board of Trustees agrees with the finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The MPC Board of Trustees should determine whether or not they want to move ahead with the EVOC project. Response: This recommendation has not yet been implemented, but MPC Board of Trustees approval will be completed by October 31, 2018. Each year, the District is required to submit its 5 Year Construction Plan to the California Community College Chancellor's Office, which indicates the capital facilities projects the District intends to build. The deadline is usually July 1; however, an update to the state facilities database system, known as FUSION, has moved this year's due date to fall 2018 (the exact date is still being determined). One of the projects in the District's 5 Year Plan is the Fort Ord Public Safety - Phase II project, which includes the EVOC project as a component. The Fort Ord Public Safety - Phase II project is currently approved by the state Chancellor's Office for a 50% state funding match and before MPC can proceed, the state must issue bonds to fund the state portion. The MPC Board of Trustees will consider approval of the 5 Year Construction Plan, including the Fort Ord Public Safety - Phase II project,
F3
An EVOC would be highly beneficial for training police recruits, existing law enforcement personnel, firefighters, and other emergency responders throughout the County and region. Response: The Board of Trustees agrees with the finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The MPC Board of Trustees should determine whether or not they want to move ahead with establishing a long-rifle range at Parker Flats. Response: This recommendation has not yet been implemented, but MPC Board of Trustees approval will be completed by October 31, 2018. - August 1, 2018 The Honorable Stephanie E. Hulsey Each year, the District is required to submit its 5 Year Construction Plan to the California Community College Chancellor's Office, which indicates the capital facilities projects the District intends to build. The deadline is usually July 1; however, an update to the state facilities database system, known as FUSION, has moved this year's due date to fall 2018 (the exact date is still being determined). One of the projects in the District's 5 Year Plan is the Fort Ord Public Safety - Phase II project, which includes constructing a rifle range at the MOUT as a component. The Fort Ord Public Safety - Phase II project is currently approved by the state Chancellor's Office for a 50% state funding match and before MPC can proceed, the state must issue bonds to fund the state portion. The MPC Board of Trustees will consider approval of the 5 Year Construction Plan, including the Fort Ord Public Safety - Phase II project,
F4
A MOUT facility would be useful for training SWAT and other law enforcement personnel throughout the County. It could also provide a useful training ground for firefighters and other first responder personnel. Response: The Board of Trustees agrees with the finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
A current financial plan detailing the feasibility of these projects should be developed by MPC. Response: This recommendation will be implemented in the future when state funding of community college facilities projects, including MPC's Fort Ord Public Safety - Phase II project, is known. As stated in the responses to Recommendations 1 - 3, MPC's project has been approved for a 50% state funding match. For the past few years, MPC's project has been included in the 2017-18 and 2018-19 capital outlay spending plan approved by the Chancellor's Office and Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges. However, for the 2017-18 and 2018-19 budget years, the state has allocated funding to a limited group of community college construction projects, only those which addressed fire and life safety concerns. A new governor will be elected in November 2018 and a different approach and spending priorities for the 2019-20 state budget are to be expected, including the allocation of funding to community college facilities projects. Having this information is necessary to the financial plan and evaluation of feasibility. In addition, an analysis of infrastructure needs, construction requirements related to land use covenants in place on MPC's Fort Ord parcels, cost estimates, and the current vision of this project will need to be completed before a financial plan can be developed.
F5
Continuing to use MOUT for its original military purpose is consistent with the 2003 facility use agreement regarding public safety officer training facilities at the former Fort Ord. Response: The Board of Trustees agrees with the finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
If the decision is to proceed on one or more projects (i.e., Rl,
F6
The upgrades and safety features needed for the MOUT facility will be costly. Response: The Board of Trustees agrees with the finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
If the MPC Board of Trustees does not proceed on one or more of these projects, MPC should give up their claim, so the land can be transferred for other allowed and desirable purposes. Response: This recommendation will not be implemented because it is not reasonable and does not acknowledge the Fort Ord property transfer process, longstanding contractual agreements with the Fort Ord Reuse Authority and Monterey County regarding transfer of these parcels to MPC, and the impact on MPC's public safety training program. Further, the MPC Board of Trustees intends to proceed with these projects. Thank you for the opportunity to respond the the Civil Grand Jury's Report. Respectfully submitted, Waltha. Dr. Walter Tribley Marilynn Dunn Gustafson Superintendent/President Chair, Board of Trustees
F7
Many law enforcement departments in the County would benefit from lower costs and travel time by creating a rifle range at the former Fort Ord. Response: The Board of Trustees agrees with the finding. ø August 1, 2018 The Honorable Stephanie E. Hulsey
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Constructing a full-scale EVOC would be expensive. Additional funding may be needed to cover those costs. Response: The Board of Trustees agrees with the finding.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
Designating large areas within the 535 acres being transferred to MPC as greenbelts, and/or as areas to be used for solar farming, could help ensure the project has a net positive impact on the environment. Response: The Board of Trustees disagrees with the finding. The finding appears to assume the project will have a negative impact on the environment. The Grand Jury report acknowledges that approximately 200 acres within the 535 acres to be transferred to MPC are designated as a habitat reserve and cannot be developed. This recommendation to designate additional acreage as green belts, and/or for solar farming, does not account for the acreage (200+) already reserved for habitat purposes. Also, solar farming would require construction and infrastructure to be installed and may have its own impact on the environment that would need mitigation.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
The operation and maintenance of the public safety officer training facilities would require additional expenditures. Response: The Board of Trustees agrees with the finding.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
The MPC Police Officer Training Academy is currently functioning without the use of the MOUT facility, a full-scale dedicated EVOC, or a firing range due to the use of temporary facilities at other locations. Response: The Board of Trustees agrees with the finding.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
An EVOC facility and trainers near to the MPC Police Officer Training Academy, where driving-related training and remediation would occur, could reduce training expenses. Response: The Board of Trustees agrees with the finding.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
The development of the EVOC and MOUT MPC training facilities at the former Fort Ord has been under consideration for more than 20 years. Response: The Board of Trustees agrees with the finding. y = 11 7.1 August 1, 2018 The Honorable Stephanie E. Hulsey
No recommendations for this finding

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.