📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Los Angeles County Grand Jury • 1981-1982

Department of Chief Medical Examiner-Coroner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Published: February 16, 2010 113 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 19 findings

F1 Page 83
The extent to which the Department has taken action to respond to recommendations made by previous grand juries and the Auditor-Controller to enhance day-to-day operations
F2 Page 83
Whether contracts are awarded to outside concerns (for drayage, property management, auctions, estate maintenance, and the like) in an equitable manner
F3 Page 83
Whether opportunities exist to contract out services currently provided by the Department at a lower cost to the County without compromising service quality
F4 Page 83
Whether adequate management information capabilities exist within the Department 82 .
F5 Page 84
Whether the Department is maximizing the revenue it could 100 potentially receive for the services it provides 1000000
F6 Page 84
The extent to which the Department monitors its own activities to ensure that estates are closed expeditiously and in keeping with departmental policies and procedures. APPROACH The review was conducted by a two-person team over a period of approximately six weeks. TOTAL STREET The team conducted extensive interviews with numerous officials of the Department as well as representatives of the County Administrative Office, the Purchasing Department, the County Counsel's Office and the Auditor-Controller. The team reviewed numerous previous Grand Jury and Auditor-Controller reports, internal PA-PG reports, case files, budgets, and 7.770 other documents containing information regarding the areas outlined under "Objectives." The team reviewed its findings, conclusions and recommendations with Department officials prior to preparation of the final report. FINDINGS The Department provides specialized services to specialized groups of clients. In some re- spects, the work carried out by the Department closely resembles the work of executors and conservators in the private sector. The Department's role, however, differs markedly from that of private executors and conservators in two respects:
F7 Page 84
The Department provides services to thousands of clients rather than to one or a few as is the case with private executors and conservators.
F8 Page 84
The Department, in addition to having a fiduciary relationship with individual clients, also holds a position of public trust. These aspects of the PA-PG's role lead to some unusual arrangements and situations. For example, the Department is not required to follow County purchasing procedures in ob- taining services for its clients. Considerable discretion is allowed by the courts in how such services are obtained. The discretion allows for a great deal of flexibility in obtaining the best service at the best price, but also allows the Department to operate without the controls imposed by competitive bidding procedures and requirements for written contracts. The Department has developed innovative arrangements for some services, but has not, in some other cases, aggressively pursued competitive bidding to ensure that clients receive the best possible services at the lowest reasonable prices. From a financial standpoint, the Department has made important strides in improving the portion of expenditures for services which are derived from the estates of clients. Since 1978, the Department has increased the portion of costs covered by client assets by over 70 per- cent. It is continuing to identify and develop new and increased revenues while maintaining a ú., responsible and compassionate approach to individual clients' conditions. Service of the 83 The Department's existing management information system is outmoded and does not provide the type of data required for efficiently administering estates and managing the Department's workload. The Department is taking steps to replace the existing system with an improved one. In the important areas of written policies and procedures and development of workload measures and standards, the Department has not developed and maintained adequate manual or automated systems. Policies and procedures, when they exist in written form, are often out of date. Evaluation of employee workload and performance is often subjective and not based on written criteria and records. CONCLUSIONS The Grand Jury concludes the following regarding the Department: The Department has taken aggressive, imaginative and appropriate steps to increase
F9 Page 85
While the Department does not appear to be required to follow County purchasing procedures in obtaining outside services for clients, it does have a fiduciary responsibi- lity to those clients to obtain adequate services at reasonable costs. In some aspects and especially with regard to certain services, the Department has not been diligent in assessing the marketplace and establishing adequate contractual arrangements and monitoring procedures. At the same time, it is noted that the current PA-PG has taken several positive steps to improve the performance of some contractors hired to serve the Department's clients. The Department has not been aggressive in identifying and analyzing areas for which
F10 Page 85
The existing management information system, while adequate in terms of basic accounting functions, does not provide the Department with a sufficiently useful management tool for workload and performance monitoring, case management and other purposes for which it was designed. Needed changes in programs and files have not been made, with the result that certain system capabilities and reports are not used. Instead, the functions for which those capabilities were designed are accom- plished manually or not at all. The Department's planned approach for developing a new management information system and for financing it through maintenance of compensating balances at a bank which would in turn provide the system, is appro- priate and cost-effective.
F11 Page 85
The Department's existing approach to monitoring the workload, performance and productivity of its employees is inadequate. Written policies and procedures in this area are out of date, and there are insufficient reporting mechanisms and performance criteria in place. 84
F12 Page 84
The Department provides services to thousands of clients rather than to one or a few as is the case with private executors and conservators.
F13 Page 84
The Department, in addition to having a fiduciary relationship with individual clients, also holds a position of public trust. These aspects of the PA-PG's role lead to some unusual arrangements and situations. For example, the Department is not required to follow County purchasing procedures in ob- taining services for its clients. Considerable discretion is allowed by the courts in how such services are obtained. The discretion allows for a great deal of flexibility in obtaining the best service at the best price, but also allows the Department to operate without the controls imposed by competitive bidding procedures and requirements for written contracts. The Department has developed innovative arrangements for some services, but has not, in some other cases, aggressively pursued competitive bidding to ensure that clients receive the best possible services at the lowest reasonable prices. From a financial standpoint, the Department has made important strides in improving the portion of expenditures for services which are derived from the estates of clients. Since 1978, the Department has increased the portion of costs covered by client assets by over 70 per- cent. It is continuing to identify and develop new and increased revenues while maintaining a ú., responsible and compassionate approach to individual clients' conditions. Service of the 83 The Department's existing management information system is outmoded and does not provide the type of data required for efficiently administering estates and managing the Department's workload. The Department is taking steps to replace the existing system with an improved one. In the important areas of written policies and procedures and development of workload measures and standards, the Department has not developed and maintained adequate manual or automated systems. Policies and procedures, when they exist in written form, are often out of date. Evaluation of employee workload and performance is often subjective and not based on written criteria and records. CONCLUSIONS The Grand Jury concludes the following regarding the Department: The Department has taken aggressive, imaginative and appropriate steps to increase
F14 Page 85
While the Department does not appear to be required to follow County purchasing procedures in obtaining outside services for clients, it does have a fiduciary responsibi- lity to those clients to obtain adequate services at reasonable costs. In some aspects and especially with regard to certain services, the Department has not been diligent in assessing the marketplace and establishing adequate contractual arrangements and monitoring procedures. At the same time, it is noted that the current PA-PG has taken several positive steps to improve the performance of some contractors hired to serve the Department's clients. The Department has not been aggressive in identifying and analyzing areas for which
F15 Page 85
The existing management information system, while adequate in terms of basic accounting functions, does not provide the Department with a sufficiently useful management tool for workload and performance monitoring, case management and other purposes for which it was designed. Needed changes in programs and files have not been made, with the result that certain system capabilities and reports are not used. Instead, the functions for which those capabilities were designed are accom- plished manually or not at all. The Department's planned approach for developing a new management information system and for financing it through maintenance of compensating balances at a bank which would in turn provide the system, is appro- priate and cost-effective.
F16 Page 85
The Department's existing approach to monitoring the workload, performance and productivity of its employees is inadequate. Written policies and procedures in this area are out of date, and there are insufficient reporting mechanisms and performance criteria in place. 84
F17 Page 85
While the Department does not appear to be required to follow County purchasing procedures in obtaining outside services for clients, it does have a fiduciary responsibi- lity to those clients to obtain adequate services at reasonable costs. In some aspects and especially with regard to certain services, the Department has not been diligent in assessing the marketplace and establishing adequate contractual arrangements and monitoring procedures. At the same time, it is noted that the current PA-PG has taken several positive steps to improve the performance of some contractors hired to serve the Department's clients. The Department has not been aggressive in identifying and analyzing areas for which
F18 Page 85
The existing management information system, while adequate in terms of basic accounting functions, does not provide the Department with a sufficiently useful management tool for workload and performance monitoring, case management and other purposes for which it was designed. Needed changes in programs and files have not been made, with the result that certain system capabilities and reports are not used. Instead, the functions for which those capabilities were designed are accom- plished manually or not at all. The Department's planned approach for developing a new management information system and for financing it through maintenance of compensating balances at a bank which would in turn provide the system, is appro- priate and cost-effective.
F19 Page 85
The Department's existing approach to monitoring the workload, performance and productivity of its employees is inadequate. Written policies and procedures in this area are out of date, and there are insufficient reporting mechanisms and performance criteria in place. 84

Recommendations 27