Kern County Grand Jury • 2013-2014

Administration & Audit Committee Mission Statement The Mission of the Administration and Audit Committee, pursuant to

Published: August 26, 2013 70 pages
View Original PDF

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F24, F25, F26, F27, F28, F29, F30, F31, F32, F33, F34, F35, F36, F37, F38, F39, F40, F41, F42, F43, F44, F45, F46, F47, F48, F49, F50, F51, F52, F53, F54, F55, F56, F57, F58, F59, F60, F61, F62, F63, F64, F65, F66, F67, F68, F69, F70, F71, F72, F73, F74, F75, F76, F77, F78, F79, F80, F81, F82, F83, F84, F85, F86, F87, F88, F89, F90, F91, F92, F93, F94, F95, F96, F97

Findings and Recommendations 24 findings

F1
The Clerk is the Administrative Assistant to the Board. (cid:127) First point of contact for the Board.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Maintains a system for managing appointments to over 70 Commissions/Committees comprised of over 550 Appointees under the authority of the Board.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
The Clerk works in excess of 60 hours per week.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Salaries and benefits account for 97% of the Budget.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Video Tape Program of the Board meetings is a $32,000 yearly expenditure.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The Board should make an attempt to allow public access by opening field offices and/or video conferencing in the outlying areas of the County: Taft, Frazier Park, Buttonwillow and Wasco. (Finding 5) NOTES: The Kern County Board of Supervisors should post a copy of this report where it will be available for public review. Persons wishing to receive an email notification of newly released reports may sign up at: www.co.kern.ca.us/grandjury and click on: Sign up for early releases. Present and past Kern County Grand Jury Final Reports and Responses can be accessed on the Kern County Grand Jury website: www.co.kern.ca.us/grandjury. RESPONSE REQUIRED WITHIN 60 DAYS TO: PRESIDING JUDGE KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 1415 TRUXTUN AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 cc: TRUXTUN AVENUE, SUITE 600 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 4 4 09/30/2014 06/13/2014
F6
All e-mails received for the Board are reviewed and forwarded to the Board and/or appropriate Departments.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
The Office is in the process of going paperless for Board Agendas and minutes with planned completion by the end of 2013.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Develop software to track the Board’s Committee/Commission appointments. (Finding 7) NOTES: The Kern County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors should post a copy of this report where it will be available for public review. Persons wishing to receive an email notification of newly released reports may sign up at: www.co.kern.ca.us/grandjury, and click on: Sign up for early releases. Present and past Kern County Grand Jury Final Reports and Responses can be accessed on the Kern County Grand Jury website: www.co.kern.ca.us/grandjury. RESPONSE REQUIRED WITHIN 60 DAYS TO: PRESIDING JUDGE KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ND 1415 TRUXTUN AVENUE, 2 FLOOR BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 cc: TRUXTUN AVENUE, SUITE 600 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
F8
Due to County budget constraints one position has been eliminated over the past five years.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The Board needs to provide funding for one temporary position until the paperless system is in place. (cid:127) If the paperless system does not alleviate the workload, as anticipated by the Department, make the temporary position permanent. (Finding 7, Finding 8)
F9
All claims against the County are received and forwarded to County Counsel.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
Seven year old computers were replaced in 2012.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
KERN COUNTY ADMINSTRATIVE PROCEDURE MANUAL, states in Chapter 7, Information Technology Services Procedure, KERN COUNTY TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS, Section I. HARDWARE, C. Desktop Computers, §5. Replacement Period: Desktop computers must be replaced after no more than five years of service. COMMENTS: The Grand Jury wishes to thank the Clerk of the Board and staff for an informative visit, follow up and full cooperation.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Adhere to existing County Policy on mandated replacement of desktop computers. (Finding 11)
F12
In some cases employees facing disciplinary charges may file for Work Comp to avoid or delay discipline.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
Risk Manager does not adjust Work Comp cases.
No recommendations for this finding
F14
At the beginning level, disciplinary claims are handled by Department Heads then coordinated with the Employment Law Team: • If a law suit is filed it is assigned to the Litigation Team • Very few employment cases go to trial
No recommendations for this finding
F15
The County Counsel and the Chief Deputies all work between 40 and 65 hours per week.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Additional Support Staff is needed to allow Attorneys to litigate and spend less time on Support Staff duties. (Findings 15 and 17) COMMENTS: The Office of the County Counsel is an extremely well organized and efficient Department of the County. The Staff is made up of very dedicated Attorneys, Paralegals and Support Staff. Many Attorneys are earning less than they could earn in private practice. The Department has saved the County huge amounts of money by working on cases in-house rather than using outside Attorneys, except as necessary. The Jury believes the above recommendations should be acted on in a timely manner in order to benefit the Office of the County Counsel. NOTES: The County of Kern, Office of the County Counsel, should post a copy of this report where it will be available for public review. Persons wishing to receive an email notification of newly released reports may sign up at: www.co.kern.ca.us/grandjury, and click on: Sign up for early releases. Present and past Kern County Grand Jury Final Reports and Responses can be accessed on the Kern County Grand Jury website: www.co.kern.ca.us/grandjury. RESPONSE REQUIRED WITHIN 90 DAYS TO: PRESIDING JUDGE KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 1415 TRUXTUN AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 cc: TRUXTUN AVENUE, SUITE 600 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
F16
The Risk Manager retired while this report was being written. This has resulted in a temporary reassignment of two Chief Deputies in the County Counsel Office: • Employment Law Chief Deputy is temporarily responsible to oversee Work Comp and the Safety Program with assistance from a Deputy County Counsel from the Advisory Team • Litigation Chief Deputy is temporarily responsible for General Liability Claims oversight
No recommendations for this finding
F17
There is a lack of support staff to perform copying, filing and other clerical duties in the County Counsel Office. Attorneys are performing many clerical activities in order to complete assignments.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The Board needs to provide funding for one temporary position until the paperless system is in place. (cid:127) If the paperless system does not alleviate the workload, as anticipated by the Department, make the temporary position permanent. (Finding 7, Finding 8)
F18
One purpose of the Advisory Team is to track all Ordinances and Resolutions and ensure they are delivered to the Clerk of the Board.
No recommendations for this finding
F19
Insufficient number of conference/hearing rooms has created delays for Attorneys in conducting their normal business in a timely manner.
No recommendations for this finding
F20
Attorneys on the Advisory Team are given Primary and Back-up assignments to represent every Department, Board, Commission and Committee of the County.
No recommendations for this finding
F21
Of all the contracts reviewed by the Advisory Team 99% are returned to the respective Departments within 10 days.
No recommendations for this finding
F22
Files Restraining Orders on behalf of employees.
No recommendations for this finding
F23
The Employment Law Team processes an average of 20-25 claims which are filed for violence in the work place.
No recommendations for this finding
F98
• In 1995, a 1% formula was set by the State to determine the amount of funds to be sent to the ERAF. J. In 1995, the County and the incorporated cities of Kern County signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to determine the amount of property taxes to be distributed to each entity. In 2005, the following MOUs were updated: Bakersfield, Ridgecrest, Shafter, Tehachapi and Wasco. K. Attachment #1 of the MOU lists the percentages of County Property Tax Transferred to Cities that are annexing property. • Tier I Arvin 25% o Ridgecrest 25% o • Tier II McFarland 35% o Shafter 35% o Wasco 35% o • Tier III Bakersfield 37.5% o Maricopa 37.5% o Taft 37.5% o • Tier IV California City 40% o Delano 40% o Tehachapi 40% o FINDINGS: F1. The Auditor-Controller-County Clerk in 2012 determined the Auditor- Controller had over allocated to the cities for annexations per the MOU’s. F2. From 1995-2012 the Auditor’s office transferred the relevant percentage to all the Cities prior to the ERAF deduction being made to the State, contradicting the MOU’s. The amount overpaid between 2005-2011 to the City of Bakersfield was $1,257,373.60. F3. The Auditor-Controller determined the amount of tax money transferred to the City of Bakersfield will be reduced over the next three years to cover the amount owed to ERAF and the County. F4. In April 2013 the total amount owed to the ERAF fund was transferred. F5. An outside agency audits KMC financial statements each year. This is not an internal audit, although it does comply with the requirement that each County department be audited bi-annually. COMMENTS: Under the current Auditor’s leadership the County has been able to correct problems in the distribution of the property tax annexation funds.
No recommendations for this finding

Comments 23