Ventura County Grand Jury
• 2002-2003
Safety and Security in Ventura County High Schools
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 11 findings
F1
Four high schools did not have complete perimeter fencing. Some decisions appeared to be made at the district level, others were dictated by the feeling of the local community.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
All schools appeared to be in compliance.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Three schools had no security personnel at the school entrance. Two additional schools were observing pupil-free days when visited, so analysis was impossible.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
All schools had excellent procedures for emergency drills. Some schools have yet to conduct a drill during lunch or passing period, but have plans in place to do so.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
The majority of schools did random searches. The non-compliant schools felt the local community might object.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Several schools had inadequate cameras; some had digital quality systems (or were in the process of procurement). Some felt there was no need for cameras.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
All high schools agreed with this recommendation.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Those high schools not utilizing Teen Court or Peer Court are either researching the idea, or using teen mentors and peer counselors.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
Only a few schools had complied with this recommendation. Local law enforcement agencies do have detailed maps of the campuses.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
All schools appeared to be in compliance.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
Progress is being made. Conclusion Most high schools are making a concerted effort to comply with the prior recommendations of the 2001-2002 Grand Jury. The problem with F-9 occurs when the roof composition makes compliance impractical. The few schools that yield to community pressures would appear to be giving lip service to student safety, possibly compromising the well-being of the school. Recommendations Each high school representative should read this report to determine if the observed inadequacies refer to their school site. Schools have traditionally been recognized as the safest location of the day for students and staff alike. Responses Required None.
No recommendations for this finding
Conclusions 1
-
CL1 Page 3Most high schools are making a concerted effort to comply with the prior recommendations of the 2001-2002 Grand Jury. The problem with F-9 occurs when the roof composition makes compliance impractical. The few schools that yield to community pressures would appear to be giving lip service to student safety, possibly compromising the well-being of the school.