📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 3 findings
F1
Page 72
Employee information, personal financial institution details, was disseminated inadvertently to the general public with no knowledge or consent of the employees. After the fact, OPUD management did inform the employees, in writing, of the dissemination of the information. The Grand Jury commends OPUD management for responding quickly to avert a potentially serious problem.
F2
Page 72
The OPUD does not have written policies and procedures for handling, storage and distribution of confidential information.
F3
Page 72
The accounting positions are considered sensitive positions; however, the employees are not required to sign agreements for the handling of confidential information.
Recommendations 2
-
R2Page 72The OPUD should develop and maintain written procedures for handling, storage and distribution of confidential information. The OPUD must ensure all employees are trained in these procedures and understand the applicability of these procedures to their respective job duties and responsibilities.
-
R3Page 72Update Job Description/Job Duty statements with confidential information requirements. Employees with access to “sensitive” information should be bonded and/or sign an agreement acknowledging adherence to procedures of handling confidential information. PASSED and ADOPTED by the Yuba County Grand Jury on May 5, 2009