Mendocino County Grand Jury • 2011-2012 • Agency Response
Response to: Employee's Retirement Association Evaluation

Grand Jury Report Response Form Grand Jury Report Title: Providing Effective Law Enforcement in Mendocino County*

Published: March 30, 2012 4 pages
View Original PDF

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F11

Findings and Recommendations 5 findings

F7
The Mendocino County Board of Supervisors disagrees in part with this finding. Proposition 172 funds are deposited into a separate agency fund on a monthly basis, and then distributed to the four cities and the County's General Fund. The Board of Supervisors has no information as to the practice in other counties.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
This recommendation has been implemented. The Mendocino County Board of Supervisors has confirmed with the with the Mendocino County Sheriff's Office Jail Administrator that appropriate policy and procedure is being followed, and reflects historical practice.
F8
The Mendocino County Board of Supervisors disagrees with this finding based on the response from the Sheriff stating that the Assistant Auditor-Controller sent a memo dated April 18, 2011 to the District Attorney and Sheriff presenting an analysis of Proposition 172 funds received since fiscal year 2007-08.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
The Mendocino County Board of Supervisors has no direct knowledge regarding staffing levels or population figures for 1985 and therefore disagrees with this finding.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
The Mendocino County Board of Supervisors, based on the response provided by the Sheriff, disagrees in part. An Acting Lieutenant commutes from his South Coast Resident Post to the Fort Bragg sub-station and manages the Coastal Sector.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
The Mendocino County Board of Supervisors, based on the response provided by the Sheriff, disagrees in part. As clarified by the Sheriff, the approximate total of 632,000 marijuana plants removed during operation Full Court Press included some marijuana plants eradicated from timber lands in proximity to the Mendocino National Forest.
No recommendations for this finding

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.