📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Shasta County Grand Jury • 2015-2016

the regular agenda and engage in full discussion regarding any proposed responses

Published: August 31, 2016 93 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 11 findings

F1 Page 70
dollars annually by providing firefighting and fire suppression work hours and projects. The partnership between California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Cal-
F2 Page 70
Fire, and camp inmates continues to allow efficient running of the camp. COMMENDATIONS The Shasta County Grand Jury commends the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection as well as the support of local community organizations for their dedication in making this partnership work.
F3 Page 75
not received follow-up from the VSO. The Board of Supervisors disagrees wholly with the finding. The Shasta County Response: VSO has had and continues to have follow-up procedures regarding veterans' benefits and their cases. Since January 2016, the Shasta County VSO has had no backlog. In addition, a veteran can file and view all movement of his or her claims on www.ebenefits.va.gov 24-hours a day. Veterans are not receiving all eligible benefits because there is not a
F4 Page 75
comprehensive case management process in place. The Board of Supervisors disagrees wholly with the finding. A comprehensive Response: case management process will not cause a veteran to become eligible for benefits. The VSO staff ensures eligible veterans either are receiving or are in the process of receiving eligible benefits. VSO staff performs tasks once done by Work-Study Program participants,
F5 Page 75
limiting available time to help veterans with their claims. The Board of Supervisors agrees with the finding. Prior to the Grand Jury report, Response: the Shasta County VSO re-implemented the Veterans Affairs Work-Study Program and currently has two students assigned which allows staff to assist veterans. The Honorable Gregory Gaul Shasta County Superior Court July 19, 2016
F6 Page 76
The VSO eliminated outreach to Burney, causing Northeastern Shasta County Veterans to travel to Redding for assistance. The Board of Supervisors agrees with the finding. However, prior to the Grand Response: Jury report, the Shasta County VSO re-implemented its monthly outreach to Burney to serve the veterans in the northeastern areas of Shasta County.
F7 Page 76
Veterans potentially receive reduced level of service as a result of previous Veterans Services Officer's time spent out of the office. The Board of Supervisors disagrees wholly with the finding. The veterans of Response: Shasta County continued to receive services from the VSO staff during business hours. Hiring Veterans Services Officers from outside Shasta County has created
F8 Page 76
misgivings among local veterans. The Board of Supervisors disagrees wholly with the finding. Shasta County Response: recruits and hires qualified applicants to fill vacant positions. Currently, only one employee in the VSO is accredited, limiting ability to assist
F9 Page 76
veterans with claims. The Board of Supervisors disagrees partially with the finding. Currently, two Response: employees in the VSO are fully State accredited. A new Veterans Services Representative requires 9-12 months of training by law before they are eligible to test for the California DVA (CalVet) accreditation. Failure of VSO staff to attend State of California training has resulted in
F10 Page 76
decreased reimbursement to the County's General Fund. The Board of Supervisors disagrees partially with the finding. Prior to the Grand Response: Jury report the VSO sent two Veterans Services Representatives to the California Association of County Veterans Service Officer (CACVSO) Training Conference in February 2016. In addition, staff will also attend the National Association of County Veterans Service Officers (NACVSO) Training Conference in June 2017. This enables Shasta County to receive the $12,000.00 per year training funds from CACVSO. The Honorable Gregory Gaul Shasta County Superior Court July 19, 2016 The Shasta County - County Executive Officer failed to provide adequate
F11 Page 77
oversight of the VSO during changes in leadership, potentially contributing to substandard caseload follow-up and poorly managed office. The County The Board of Supervisors disagrees wholly with the finding. Response: Executive Officer provided and continues to provide adequate oversight of the VSO. Retired Veterans Service Officers Bob Dunlap and David Lanford returned to the VSO on an interim basis to assist the veterans of Shasta County during the transition of Veterans Service Officer.

Recommendations 12