San Diego County Grand Jury • 2011-2012

Citizens’ Review Board on Police Practices

Published: May 22, 2012 9 pages
View Original PDF

Findings 7 findings

F01
This process allows bias, prejudice, and other personal feelings of the interview committee members to influence their recommendations. Fact: There is a lack of decorum among Board members in open sessions when members of the public are present. Fact: The lack of decorum has created an atmosphere of fear and intimidation among some Board and prospective members. Fact: Lack of decorum is in direct conflict with the Board’s own policies and procedures-bylaws. 6
F02
The lack of decorum among Board members has contributed to a high turnover of prospective members and has affected the Board’s ability to function properly.
F03
CRB leadership is weak, ineffectual, and unresponsive.
F04
A faction of Board members is allowed to control Board activity.
F05
If CRB leadership were stronger and more willing to be involved, decorum and factions among Board members could be controlled. Fact: The CRB allows IA personnel to attend all closed sessions.
F06
IA personnel attendance in closed sessions inhibits the CRB from being independent, fair, and impartial.
F07
Interference by IA personnel during the review process prohibits the three- member team from making independent, fair, and impartial reviews of IA reports.

Recommendations 7

Agency Responses 1

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

San Diego City