Score: 0 (1/11/1)
Contra Costa County Grand Jury • 2017-2018

Contact: Mario Gutierrez Foreperson

Published: May 14, 2018 13 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 8 findings

F1
BART PD controls subscriptions to its daily crime log and does not make the log readily available to the public. There is no permanent link on BART.gov website
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
BART PD should consider providing permanent web links to crimemapping.com and to the subscription form for the BART Police Daily Log on the “BART Police” page (https://bart.gov/about/police) of BART.gov
F2
BART PD provides crime incident reports within fifteen incident categories to crimemapping.com. A crosscheck between incidents reported on the BART Police Daily Log and in the crimemapping.com website suggests that some BART PD incident data is being lost.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
BART PD should consider reviewing their data upload process to crimemapping.com for process integrity and data completeness within the fifteen crime incident categories reported,
F3
Crimemapping.com offers limited information about crimes that occur on BART property.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
BART PD should consider offering the most recent 180 days of the BART Police Daily Log reports, with simple text search function, from a permanent web link on the “BART Police” page (https://bart.gov/about/police) of BART.gov
F4
Crimemapping.com provides the public less detailed information about crime on BART than Bartcrimes.com
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
BART PD should consider seeking funds at the next budget funding cycle to deploy more Community Service Officers to patrol BART stations and parking lots.
F5
BART PD is currently operating with about 16 percent fewer sworn officers than its authorized staffing level.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
BART’s Board of Directors should consider seeking funds at the next budget funding cycle to equip all parking lots and garages with adequate lighting and working video cameras.
F6
Community Service Officers are non-sworn civilian employees that provide technical assistance to BART police personnel and could be assigned to patrol stations and parking lots.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
BART’s Board of Directors should consider directing maintenance to make cleanliness a priority and improve the level of sanitation in stations, elevators, and restrooms. If additional personnel is needed, a request for funding may be considered for the next funding cycle.
F7
BART parking lots and garages have insufficient lighting and few or no security cameras.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
BART officials and riders are dissatisfied with the lack of sanitation in stations, elevators, and restrooms.
No recommendations for this finding

Agency Responses 2

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.