📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Amador County Grand Jury • 2005-2006

Planning and Development

6 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 7 findings

F1 Page 23
In compliance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, agendas for meetings of the TAC have been made public. However, since October 24, 2004, minutes for those meetings have not been publicly posted nor made available on the Amador County website.
F2 Page 23
The position of County “Water Resources Director” does not exist. The responsibility for representing that position is now part of public works.
F3 Page 23
Amador County Water Agency is currently an “ex-officio” member of the TAC, communicating with the committee via e-mail or an occasional attendance at their meetings. 3.1.7
F4 Page 26
There are no readily available forms for petitioning LAFCO.
F5 Page 26
Amador County Administration states that LAFCO has “no planning function within the county”.
F6 Page 26
No evidence has been found that the current Amador County LAFCO has defined or adopted “spheres of influence” in the county.
F7 Page 24
Growth and planning continue to claim the attention of the population of Amador County, as well as the various agencies involved in the process. 3.2.7

Recommendations 3