📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Placer County Grand Jury • 2019-2020

Placer County Information Technology Fiscal Transparency and Governance

Published: June 30, 2020 14 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 6 findings

F1 Page 68
Placer County’s total cost for providing IT services cannot be determined from current financial reports. This defeats the county’s goal for transparency of costs and operations.
F2 Page 68
Numerous IT policies and procedures, including, among others, “Data Network Standards Policy” (2013) and “Employee Technology Use Policy” (2017), appear to be out-of-date and do not reflect current technology.
F3 Page 68
Placer County does not have a complete view of system security, backup, and recovery because of the fragmented responsibility for these services.
F4 Page 68
The Department of Information Technology has limited arrangements for cross-training or vacation coverage with offices, departments, or agencies that maintain their own in- house IT operations.
F5 Page 68
No audits of security, segregation of duties, or system controls were conducted to verify proper performance of the Workday Enterprise Resource Planning system after its implementation.
F6 Page 68
The failure to complete the knowledge transfer plan for the new ERP system required the county to fund the extension of a consulting contract.

Recommendations 6