Santa Clara County Grand Jury • 2006-2007

2006-2007 Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury Report Probation Department’s Restitution Program Fails Victims and Wards

Published: June 21, 2007 6 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 5 findings

F1
The 0316 Fund and the 0320 Fund are not being administered in a manner that complies with the intent of the BOS, State, and guidelines of the Probation Department.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Publish a yearly management report to the BOS which provides details of victim restitution and ward compensation paid over the previous twelve months.
F2
The policy of requiring wards to successfully complete the Aftercare Program before paying restitution penalizes victims of juvenile crime. Only 48 percent of the wards are completing the program.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Revise the Probation Department guidelines for restitution from the 0320 Fund to stipulate that victims are to be paid upon the completion of the Ranch Program by the ward.
F3
Other than the six wards who were eligible, no one who has participated in the 0320 Fund program has received payments for their labor.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Revise the current Probation Department guidelines to pay for wards’ labor once they have completed the Ranch Program and restitution has been paid.
F4
No payments from the 0316 Fund have been made during the past four years.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Pay restitution to victims out of the 0316 Fund and close this fund after it is depleted.
F5
Upon achieving the $100,000 benchmark goal in 2004, there have been minimal restitution and labor payments contrary to Probation Department guidelines.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Pay restitution to uncompensated victims and compensate wards who have completed the Ranch Program since 2004. 4

Conclusions 1

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office