Contra Costa County Grand Jury • 2008-2009 • Agency Response
Response to: Retiree Healthcare Benefits Leave County Taxpayers on the Hook

Board of Supervisors Response to Grand Jury Report No. 0904:

Published: September 29, 2009 6 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 24 findings

F1
According to the US Census, almost 11% of the thirty-six million residents in California are 65 or older. Its most recent estimate is that Contra Costa County residents over age 65 constitute 11.5 % of the County's population, or about 118,000 individuals. Response: Agree
No recommendations for this finding
F2
The fastest growing segment of the population in Contra Costa County is the 85+ age group. Over the next ten years, this group is predicted to skyrocket by 55%. The 65+ age group is expected to increase 37%. Response: Partially agree. According to the U.S. Census Year 2000 projections, in 2010 there were 128,029 persons 65 years and older living in Contra Costa County. Ten years hence, in 2020, there will be approximately 187,168 persons 65 years and older living in Contra Costa County. This represents a 46% growth. From 2010 to 2020, it is anticipated that there will be a 68% growth in the 65+ population in Contra Costa County. According to the U.S. Census Year 2000 projections, in 2010 there will be 19,514 persons 85 years and older living in Contra Costa County. Twenty years hence, in 2030, the 85+ population in Contra Costa County will grow to 24,524 representing an increase of 26% in this age group.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
During the fiscal years 2006-2008, more than 3500 reports of elder abuse in all forms, were reported to Contra Costa County's Adult Protective Services, a division of Contra Costa County Health and Human Services. Of the reports made in 2006-2007, 486 dealt with elder financial abuse. The number increased to 528 in 2007-2008, an increase of 9.2%. Response: Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
The legislature recognizes that elders and dependent adults may be subjected to abuse, neglect, or abandonment, and that this state has a responsibility to protect these persons. Response: Neither agree nor disagree. We have no direct knowledge of what the Legislature may or may not recognize. However, in 1999 the Legislature passed Senate Bill 2199. This bill amended the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act and requires county adult - 1 - protective services agencies to provide a program of services to maintain the safety of elders and dependent adults in the home and in the community.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Contra Costa County elderly residents, who lack financial, physical or mental health support, have little or no protective options provided by their local government Response: Partially disagree. Adult Protective Services is mandated to provide protective services to Contra Costa County residents 65 years and older, as well as dependent adults. As of January 1, 2009, due to significant budget reductions impacting Adult Protective Services’ staffing, protective services involving an investigation have been prioritized to focus primarily on perpetrator abuse, specifically physical and financial abuse cases involving Contra Costa County elderly residents and dependent adults.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
The State mandates that Contra Costa County provide financial protective services to its most fragile citizens under the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protective Act. Response: Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
Paid or unpaid individuals responsible for caring for elderly adults are mandated to report elder abuse. These mandated reporters include but are not limited to administrators, supervisors and licensed staff providing care and services to the elderly, APS employees, health practitioners (such as physicians and nurses), police officers, clergy members, employees of financial institutions, and elder or dependent adult care custodians. Care custodians include, for example, home health agency administrators and staff, and fire department members. Response: Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
If a mandated reporter fails to report to an appropriate government agency, incidents of known or suspected abuse, he or she may incur a civil penalty in an action by the Attorney General, District Attorney or County Counsel. Response: Agree. In addition there could be criminal penalties.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
SB 1018 (The Financial Abuse Reporting Act of 2005), effective on January 1, 2007, requires Contra Costa County's APS agency to provide mandated reporters of suspected financial abuse of an elder or dependant adult with instructional materials. These materials define elder and dependent adult abuse and neglect, and also describes mandated reporters' obligation to report such abuse. Response: Agree. - 2 -
No recommendations for this finding
F10
About 25% of elder abuse cases are referred to law enforcement for possible criminal investigation. Response: Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
Perpetrators of elder abuse include spouses and adult children, grandchildren, other relatives, caregivers, parents, siblings, service providers or caregivers, unknown persons or friends, and others. Response: Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
Recognized experts estimate that only one in five cases of elder abuse in California is reported. Response: Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
Adult Protective Services lost the following staff as of January I, 2009; one Public Health Nurse, one Mental Health Clinical Specialist, nine Social Workers, and two Social Work Supervisors. Response: Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F14
Due to staff reductions, APS will no longer be able to provide case management services for the elderly victims of abuse and neglect in Contra Costa County. Response: Partially disagree with this finding. Due to staff reductions, APS will prioritize investigation and case management capability to reports involving perpetrator abuse such as physical abuse and financial abuse. With limited social worker staff, APS will not be able to offer case management services to dependent and older adults suffering from self-neglect.
No recommendations for this finding
F15
The protective net that APS has provided to the elderly will be reduced to referral of cases to police departments, hospitals, mental health and the public guardian’s office. Response: Partially disagree. Protective services will be provided by Contra Costa County APS to elder and dependent adult victims of abuse involving a perpetrator. Due to significant budget reductions, APS response to reports of victims of self neglect will be very limited and, as a result, many of these cases will surface in police departments, hospital emergency rooms, mental health clinics and the public guardian’s office.
No recommendations for this finding
F16
Outreach to the community regarding elder abuse and neglect, mandatory reporting, and elder financial abuse will no longer be provided due to APS staff reductions. Response: Partially disagree. We are in agreement that outreach to the community regarding elder abuse and neglect, mandatory reporting and elder financial abuse will no longer be provided by APS due to APS staff reductions. - 3 - However, there is a countywide effort to train volunteers to reach out to the community regarding elder financial abuse. A training of volunteers was held on April 9, 2009. Partners in this effort include: Contra Costa District Attorney, Area Agency on Aging, Advisory Council on Aging, JFK University Elder Law Clinic, Elder Financial Protection Network, California Department of Consumer Affairs, Contra Costa for Every Generation, Amazing Solutions Foundation, East County Senior Coalition, City of Richmond Commission on Aging.
No recommendations for this finding
F17
The Contra Costa County Conservatorship/Guardianship (C/G) Program (which is within the Mental Health Division of the Department of Health Services), deals with elderly persons with and without dementia and dependent adults who need assistance in managing their financial affairs. Current referrals come primarily from APS, local hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, the courts, friends and family members. Response: Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F18
California law (Probate Code Section 2920) specifies that, if a court order is issued requiring a conservator be appointed, and no one else is available, a Public Guardian shall be appointed. Response: Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F19
Each case accepted by the C/G program requires consultation with, and the support of, legal counsel. Within the County Counsel's Department there is no designated attorney to serve the C/G Program. Response: Disagree. The County Counsel’s Office is available for consultation, representation and legal research upon request; however, neither the Welfare and Institutions Code nor the Probate Code contains a requirement legally obligating the C/G Program to consult with and obtain the support of legal counsel with respect to every case accepted. The County Counsel’s Office currently has a deputy county counsel assigned as primary legal counsel to the C/G Program. Other deputies provide backup assistance as required and also assist in litigation matters on behalf of the C/G Program in Contra Costa County Superior Court. This arrangement ensures that legal counsel is available to assist the C/G Program when needed.
No recommendations for this finding
F20
Ongoing probate conservatorship services to qualifying elderly persons, including money management services, are provided only as a last resort and only if a private or personal alternative is not available. Response: Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F21
Elderly persons without sufficient financial resources are not eligible for assistance from the existing C/G Program and ultimately get lost in the system. Response: Disagree The majority of persons served are indigent/below the poverty line. - 4 -
No recommendations for this finding
F22
The C/G Program currently manages with 20 staff members the funds (estates) of over 500 people who need money management and conservatorship services. Response: Partially disagree. Case mangers assist in money management as well.
No recommendations for this finding
F23
Of the 20 staff members, there are four designated probate conservators in the C/G Program to serve elderly people needing probate conservatorship services. Response: Partially disagree. The program serves elderly and dependent persons. There is a Program Manager, a Supervisor who triages/assigns and diverts all cases, and a Properties Trust Officer that does primarily Probate work.
No recommendations for this finding
F24
Due to the lack of designated staff, the legal needs of the C/G Program are not being met. Response: Disagree. The Program is currently meeting its mandates as outlined in regulation. Staff and managers are being cross trained to create redundancies in the unit.
No recommendations for this finding