📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Tulare County Grand Jury • 2009-2010

2009-2010 Penal Code Section 933.05

102 pages Consolidated Report
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 26 findings

F1
There were a total of 18 final reports in the 2008 – 2009 Final Report, 16 Did not of which required responses from 40 Partially agree different entities with a total of 57 agreed 1.65% required responses. 12.82%
F2
There were 256 findings and 42
F3
Orosi High School failed to respond to law the Status of Harassment Policies in Tulare County High Schools report.
F4
Of those who responded, 10 (18.18%) responded late. Will be Will not be implemente
F5
Of those who responded 45, implemente d 46.16% d 30.32% (81.82%) responded on time.
F6
Forty entities (72.73%) responded as set forth by Penal Code 933.05.
F7
Fifteen (27.27%) of those who Currently in responded did not respond as set place 23.52% forth by Penal Code 933.05.
F8
The following diagrams indicate the percentages of concurrence and Percentage of implementation as implementation of the findings and Recommended by 2008-2009 Grand Jury
F9
The City made the assertion that refuse collection is a “specialized The fact that the City considered items in service” and as such would fall under the proposals that were not requested in City Ordinance No. 579, Section the RFP indicates that not all of the 3.36.110 relating to “Professional companies that submitted proposals were and Specialized Services”. This playing on an equal playing field. One section states that it applies to “The company was given preference for acquisition of copyrighted and programs that were not required in the patented items, specialized or RFP and other companies were not professional services, and services allowed to adequately respond. If the City for which there is no reasonable was interested in these programs, all alternative which is of equal or better companies that submitted a proposal quality or nature, shall be made by should have been given the opportunity to following the procedures set forth in respond, or the programs should have this Section. been identified in the RFP. A. The purchase order or contract award for such professional or The City claims that since this was a specialized services or materials proposal and not a bid, City Ordinance No. shall have a copy of a statement 579, Section 3.36.100 does not apply. attached thereto by both the Regardless of what the process is called, a vendor or contractor and the City contract was negotiated in violation of City Administrator stating the reasons Ordinance No. 579, Section 3.36.100. and the specific copyright or The Grand Jury does not believe that patent circumstances which have refuse collection would fall under the given rise to the invoking of this “Professional and Specialized Services” exception to the competitive section of the City Ordinance. Paragraph acquisition process set out in this E of this section states “’Professional Chapter. Services’ means work performed by specially trained and experienced persons, The original of such statement shall firms or corporations rendering be filed with the City Clerk.” professional services and advise (sic) such The Grand Jury was unable to find as accounting, auditing, financial advisory, any such statement. securities underwriting, legal, medical, engineering, architectural, environmental,
F10
The contract negotiated with Sunset economic, real estate, insurance, Waste contains a provision for a appraisal, lobbying, public relations, 13 × ordinance codification and publication, or 2. Offer the senior citizen discount similar such highly specialized services.” specified in the contract. However, if refuse collection does fall 3. If the City intends to use the RFP under this exemption the City failed to process, adopt an ordinance to follow it’s own procedures by failing to specify the process. attach a statement stating the “...reasons
F11
The training costs provided by the City City of Lindsay Director of Public do not include the additional cost that will be required to cover the shifts of the employees in training during their absence. CONCLUSIONS Prior to the consolidation, the firefighters need for equipment and adequate living quarters were lacking. It appears as if the needs of the police were given priority over those of the firefighters. While the City should be commended for cross training police and firefighters, the City should thoroughly investigate the history of the prior consolidation and subsequent separation of functions in an effort to avoid having history repeat itself. Ø 16 EXETER DISTRICT AMBULANCE BOARD ON THE MEND?
F12
In 2004, a Superintendent was hired over 20 years. and his wife was hired as Principal.
F13
In 2008, the Superintendent retired altered was not found. and recommended to the Board that his wife assume his Superintendent 20. California Education Code Sections duties as well as her duties as 52852, 52852.5 and 62002.5 Principal in 2009. The Board require schools to have an elected complied with the recommendation School Site Council. There is no data and hired her without posting a job to support the existence of a School opening. Site Council.
F14
On April 9, 2010, the CONCLUSIONS Superintendent/Principal submitted her resignation papers, requesting Although the School Board of Trustees are elected by the registered voters within Ø 48 Woodville School District and given the 3. Board Members read and adhere to responsibility for ensuring accountability the Board By-Laws and operating to the local community, the evidence procedures. shows otherwise. The Board Members have not fulfilled their required 4. Establish a School Site Council as responsibilities. They appear to be a required by California Education rubber stamp used by the two prior school Code. Superintendents.
F15
A petition was submitted to the Board
F16
Water meters are not read on a regular schedule.
F17
The CSD Ordinance 83-01 outlines the government code references to avoid requirements for drilling a well within its having to call an attorney about matters boundaries. that are common to the CSD’s routine business.
F18
During the current booking process, all
F19
Evidence of STAR test scores being
F20
Seizure medication was confiscated from an inmate and was not provided 2Also known as HHSA Pharmacy Ø 60 until after two weeks and three 27. Inmates’ medication is dispensed twice emergency visits to Kaweah Delta a day, including those that are District Hospital. prescribed to be taken three or four times a day. Dosages are increased to
F21
One inmate was on chemotherapy when allow for frequency. incarcerated. The Judge ordered the continuation of chemotherapy. 28. The majority of prescriptions are However, two sessions were missed, antibiotics and pain medications. and the inmate had to file a complaint before the chemotherapy was 29. There is no communication or briefing administered. between medical staff during shift change.
F22
A Med Tech threatened to have an inmate’s need for medication reviewed 30. There are multiple conflicts within and because of disrespectful behavior. between Title 15, the Sheriff’s Detention Policy Manual and the Health Care
F23
The Health Care Manual Policy 95- Manual (e.g. Sheriff’s Detention Policy 01(V)(F) (1, 2 and 3) states, “Unused #F-625 and #F-408). medication should be returned to the HHSA Pharmacy in unit dose containers CONCLUSIONS for disposal. Containers shall not be taken apart and the medications shall It appears as though the term “adequate” as not be removed prior to returning to the referred to in Title 15 regarding health care pharmacy. Any unit dose container no has been defined in Tulare County as “barely longer in use (i.e., inmate released, sufficient or satisfactory” instead of medication discontinued or therapy “sufficient for a specific requirement” completed) must be returned to pharmacy as soon as possible. It is Inmates being offered outside medical preferable to return unit dose services in a limited manner and sick call containers on a daily basis. Out of date slips not being processed timely could lead to medications are to be returned to the long term illnesses and additional financial HHSA Pharmacy on a monthly basis.” burden to the County.
F24
In October 2009, a large box of Not providing a secure accounting of unused ‘salvaged’ medication disappeared from medication leads to theft or lost of BWDF. The contents of the box were medication and is not a fiscally sound unknown, due to the lack of a chain of practice. custody. Threatening to review the need for
F25
The Sheriff’s Detention Policy Manual # medication to control inmates is not part of B300 H(3) states, “The Shift Supervisor the policy. will…prior to release...retrieve all inmate medications and give the inmate, not to Jail policies and procedures not being exceed a two-week supply”. followed are causing significant medical and medication problems within the jail system.
F26
Medication does not always go with the inmate upon their release. 61 ×

Recommendations 19

Conclusions 2

No Responses Found 3

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

County of Tulare Agency
Tulare County County
Tulare County Resource Conservation District Conservation District