📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 4 findings
F1
Page 18
Disagree Partially referred to Sheriff’s R1 Implemented response
F2
Page 18
Agrees R2 Implemented
F3
Page 18
Disagrees Wholly - referred to Sheriff’s response
F4
Page 18
Disagree Partially referred to Sheriff’s response Key Findings Findings #1, #3, and #4. The County Board of Board of Supervisors responses were based on the Sheriff Department’s invited responses that focused on what happened within the Sheriff’s jurisdiction and not the problems outside of their jurisdiction. The County Board of Supervisors agreed to Finding #2 and advocates for additional funding through the California Office of Emergency Services that meets quarterly and is responsible for the 911/E911 services and funding in each county in the State. Key Recommendations The County has implemented both recommendations and alternatively included their own
Recommendations 4
-
R1Page 18Children Services Division Dedicated to None Protecting Riverside County Children
-
R2Page 182020 Consolidated General Election None Administrated Fairly and Impartially
-
R3Page 18Internal Audits Marginalized 1. The Continuity Committee should review the proposed Audit Oversight Committee membership composition and charter before being implemented to ensure the Internal Audit and Audit Committee Charter align to achieve the desired goals.
-
R4Page 18Risk Associated with Lack of Vendor 1. Recommendation #1: The County does Management not assign a risk value to critical vendors but has agreed to review the recommendation.